Channel
@jdjsjjsjshshdh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,983subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002864697873 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jdjsjjsjshshdh |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jdjsjjsjshshdh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 4,983 | -47 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 5,030 | -51 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 5,081 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 5,083 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,030 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友提醒 这个代充的是骗子，看见绕道走。 价格低于市场价三百，频道几十年不更新。群里有更新，KB转账却问我是韩国的吗，一看就是国内的。 被我拆穿后自愧不如，给自己澄清哪里有做代充还自己亏钱的。 我说我自己可以充点券，只需要代购，就开始诱导说自己充的贵，叫和他充实惠，一点也不专业 @🔔关注频道🔔 @jdjsjjsjshshdh 🔥小编投稿广告🔥 @jiajia478
❤1
#网友投稿 老天，这种傻逼骗子，在✈️说呢好好的、钱转好了，叫他转KBZ直接就给我全部拉黑删除。 有认识的嘛？好像就说我们腊戌呢，认识他家更好呢。 做代理的朋友们注意！！这个女生谁认识这个女生 做他的代理 还骗钱一个小女生家家 还搞这种 以后谁还敢做代理没有钱做代理 还搞这样 可怕 @🔔关注频道🔔 @jdjsjjsjshshdh 🔥小编投稿广告🔥 @jiajia478
#木姐朵越沙滩路口正对面的第二条路，8月11日上午10点35分左右，一处民宅内逮捕了60名涉嫌参与网络诈骗的中国男子。 并缴获了85部手机、11台一体机电脑、2台StarLink设备、2台移动电源、4台笔记本电脑、1台UPS电源、2辆摩托车及相关设备 @🔔关注频道🔔 @jdjsjjsjshshdh 🔥小编投稿广告🔥 @jiajia478
#吃瓜 亚太哪个人才晒的衣服 @🔔关注频道🔔 @jdjsjjsjshshdh 🔥小编投稿广告🔥 @jiajia478
😍😄😄😄😄 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 🧐专业服务 超高限红 毫秒出款 ❤️2026世界杯官方指定站点 ❤️正版pg/pp满限红 一注2000 ❤️视讯大厂超高限红 一口20万 ❤️加拿大PC28/香港彩最高赔率 当限红拉到爆 当提现秒到账 9Y国际已成为资深玩家首选 官方网址 ➔ 9Y.COM 综合娱乐 ➔ @GF9Y 官方频道 ➔ @WWW9YCOM 💎🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋💎
#网友投稿 木姐朵越这里又被抓了一家 我朋友当兵的说今天一个朵越都要检查 在木姐朵越的朋友赶紧撤#网友投稿 @🔔关注频道🔔 @jdjsjjsjshshdh 🔥小编投稿广告🔥 @jiajia478
😍😄😄😄😄 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 🧐专业服务 超高限红 毫秒出款 ❤️2026世界杯官方指定站点 ❤️正版pg/pp满限红 一注2000 ❤️视讯大厂超高限红 一口20万 ❤️加拿大PC28/香港彩最高赔率 当限红拉到爆 当提现秒到账 9Y国际已成为资深玩家首选 官方网址 ➔ 9Y.COM 综合娱乐 ➔ @GF9Y 官方频道 ➔ @WWW9YCOM 💎🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋💎
https://t.me/lloookkppwnwn
https://t.me/dskjsjwjenplll
😍😄😄😄😄 1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣1️⃣ 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 🧐专业服务 超高限红 毫秒出款 ❤️2026世界杯官方指定站点 ❤️正版pg/pp满限红 一注2000 ❤️视讯大厂超高限红 一口20万 ❤️加拿大PC28/香港彩最高赔率 当限红拉到爆 当提现秒到账 9Y国际已成为资深玩家首选 官方网址 ➔ 9Y.COM 综合娱乐 ➔ @GF9Y 官方频道 ➔ @WWW9YCOM 💎🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋💎
我支持出轨 原因如下 #越南小姐姐投稿：这可能是一个很有争议的观点，但我和我的伴侣都曾多次出轨，而这丝毫没有影响我们的感情 事实上，我觉得允许这种事情发生，反而让我们的关系更加牢固，也建立了更深的信任 每个人都有自己的需求、渴望和欲望，而有时候，仅靠一个人并不能满足所有需求 A能够提供的，也许B做不到；而B能够给予的，A也未必能提供。因此，去别人那里寻找自己缺失的“拼图”，最终每个人都会更快乐 并不是要贬低我的伴侣，他是个善良又聪明的人，但他并非样样都擅长，我自己也一样 所以，有时候我们会寻找其他伴侣来满足彼此无法满足的需求
❤1
#群友投稿：在缅甸腊戌，之前谈了一个女朋友。 刚在一起的时候，她对我挺好的，平时她想要什么，只要我能满足的基本都会给。为了表达心意，我也花了不少钱，项链、手镯、戒指这些首饰都买过，只希望她能感受到我的真心，也希望两个人能好好走下去。 那时候我一直觉得自己遇到了一个值得付出的人，对她也是尽心尽力。可是后来我才发现，她竟然脚踩两条船。曾经那些付出和信任，在知道真相以后变得特别讽刺。 感情里最难接受的，不是花了多少钱，而是你认真对待一个人，把她当成未来规划的一部分，最后却发现自己只是其中一个选择
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @jdjsjjsjshshdh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 455,016 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jdjsjjsjshshdh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸（木姐）新闻吃瓜群🇲🇲” (@jdjsjjsjshshdh), 4,983 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jdjsjjsjshshdh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.