【时间】:2026-08-08 【老师】:雯雯 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:7 【颜值】:6 【身材】:6 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:7 【综合】:7.33 【过程】:中了半价体验券260体验服务,还要什么自行车啊,跟老师约好时间,老师遥控上楼,进到房间,看到了老师,是属于御女少妇形,老师很热情,又是递水又是换鞋,休息了几分钟后就一起洗澡了,老师服务跟态度真的是没的说,服务态度真的是满分,一起洗澡过程中老师帮洗,洗完还来了个水中萧,完全没有齿感,洗好后还贴心的在床上铺好一次性浴巾,按摩B面,按完后到A面,老师口技很棒,在老师高超的技术下,老二不争气的立正了起来,可能是我这几天状态不太好,加上老师水很多,随后123就交代了。老师很健谈,服务态度真的很好,休息了一会就撤退了。总结:老师没有因为是半价而摸鱼,服务满分,态度满分。 【狼友大队】:点击入群

Channel
雯雯的后花园
@jdjbbxjb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,078subscribers
-53 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003926154131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jdjbbxjb |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jdjbbxjb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 1,078 | -63 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:40 | 1,141 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 1,131 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.7%
- avg views ÷ 1,078 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 396
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.162%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,144 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😀 野寻深圳SB撒币互推活动强势来袭~ 😀 报名参与人数越多,总奖金池越高,不看邀请人数,报名参与即可,奖金多少纯看运气,最高可得 2️⃣3️⃣3️⃣3️⃣ 现金 活动方案 :https://t.me/chasesz_xlb/956 深圳交流 :https://t.me/chasesz_jlq 深圳报名 : 野寻·南汐 @chase_nx 双向联系 @chase_nx_bot
【学生留名】:LI 【出击时间】:8.5 【老师名字】:固戍雯雯 【深圳地区】:#深圳 #宝安固戍 【出击消费】:520p 【颜值身材】:和照片有7分像,身材很丰满 【服务内容】:陪浴,按摩等该有的都有 【上课体验】:第一次中老师的半价卷,和老师联系后,回答今天有空,于是欣然前往老师的地方,话说确实有点远,到了后,遥控上楼,见面后,老师属于御姐少妇型,很善谈,一点都不冷场,也算舟车劳顿,不枉此行!稍作歇息后,和老师一起共浴,冲凉,老师很认真擦洗我的小弟弟,瞬间就有感觉了,老师蹲下然后水萧,很舒服,无齿感……上床躺着休息,老师温馨的开始进行服务,边按摩边聊会天,按到敏感部位时,二弟必须立刻肃然起敬,老师微微一笑,直接上嘴,可能是好长时间没体验过了,那感觉真是像在天上飞一样,多巴胺分泌直接爆炸……后面过程就是老师上位,然后我上位,最后后入式,所有过程,老师都很配合,特别是按着老师的下体,明显感觉老师也很爽,最舒服时,老师身体一抖一抖…
天天宝贝长,宝贝短,宝贝湿了你不管
有空,可约
你喜欢我吞吞吐吐的样子,我喜欢你进进出出的神情
❤1
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H178554832442 🎰 宝安雯雯女仆半价抽奖 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 1.各位兄弟请遵守群规,严禁非正常断句,严禁刷屏,严禁复制粘贴,严禁无意义对话,严禁撤回消息,有以上行为者取消中奖资格,为创造良好的出击交流平台,请大家用心交流! 2.炸号者、退群者、注销账号者中奖无效! 3.活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有! 💁 参与情况:37达标 / 48报名 🔋 人品加成:7票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖:@hcfhjur 1. Li Qiang 奖品:单P半价券 祝大家心想事成好运连连!
开课了,宝子们
进群有白嫖、红包 👇🏻 https://t.me/+2aQ-Ur1Zq5piOTJl
❤1
爱情就像电梯,在你的世界上上下下,进进出出
❤1
🎰 宝安雯雯女仆半价抽奖 📮 参与条件: 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-雯雯的后花园 🎫 加入-深圳女仆屋 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 18 条 🎫 加入-女仆精选公开榜 🎫 加入-女仆轮播群 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 单P半价券 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 1.各位兄弟请遵守群规,严禁非正常断句,严禁刷屏,严禁复制粘贴,严禁无意义对话,严禁撤回消息,有以上行为者取消中奖资格,为创造良好的出击交流平台,请大家用心交流! 2.炸号者、退群者、注销账号者中奖无效! 3.活动最终解释权归本群管理团队所有! 🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月04日 12时00分00秒
❤1
📊 0条车评,综合评分 好评 0% |人照 |服务 中评 0% |颜值 |态度 差评 0% |身材 |环境 【常驻群】深圳兰苑 榜单 报告群 报告,投诉,好评 💃🏻【芳名】#雯雯 🏠【位置】#宝安区 💵【课费】#520 #860 ✈️【联系】@hcfhjur 🤖【备用联系】@bdjbbdtetris_bot 🎉【频道】https://t.me/jdjbbxjb 💯【标签】#御姐 #69 #无套口 #舌吻 备注:#已视频验证 去过麻烦提交报告,要定金就别去并 反馈管理 ✏️ 报告模版 ✉️提交报告 ✍️出击报告,因字符有限,报告可在下方评论区可全部查看:👇👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @jdjbbxjb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 889,672 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“雯雯的后花园” (@jdjbbxjb), 1,078 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jdjbbxjb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.