Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ꪆৎ. ݁˖ 02𝚣 ⁷ life perfección 💗

@jayjakehoonz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

848subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003048711295
TypeChannel
Username@jayjakehoonz
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jayjakehoonz

Growth

848849848.56 Aug 2026, 19:51 — 849 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:08 — 848 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:516 Aug 2026, 21:08
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 848–849 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 21:08848-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:51849first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 848 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,667
Reactions total406
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

406 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519525119639423818516640.9%
custom 529428063529522609910525.9%
custom 52425331556210607697919.5%
custom 52355193537676249625613.8%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC33 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

going REDRED like hot cheetos good hit like these channels 🤩 : boys : ✶ cortis : cortis 🤩 james 🤩 martin 🤩 seonghyeon 🤩 juhoon 🤩 keonho 🌟 seonghyeon 🤩 keonho 🤩 seonghyeon 🤩 juhoon 🌟 seonghyeon 🤩 keonho 🤩 ✶ txt : beomgyu & yeonjun 🤩 ✶ enhypen : jake 🤩 jake & sunghoon 🤩 sunoo & ni-ki 🤩 jakewon 🤩 sunoo & jake 🤩 jay & jake & sunghoon 🤩 sunoo & jay 🤩 jungwon & ni-ki 🤩 sunghoon & ni-ki 🤩 ✶ ald1 : sangwon 🤩 geonwoo 🤩 san

6 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC137 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

друзья ПОЖАЛУЙСТА пишите как можно больше, используйте готовые фразы и придумывайте что-то от себя, ситуация становится все хуже

custom 529428063529522609917

6 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC266 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Given-Taken 3:03 Drunk-Dazed 3:13 Tamed-Dashed 3:16 Blessed-Cursed 2:50 Future Perfect 3:00 Bite Me 2:37 Sweet Venom 2:28 XO 3:08 No Doubt 2:47 Bad Desire 2:21 Knife 2:19 Bloody Paradise 2:11

custom 523551935376762496224custom 52942806352952260997custom 51952511963942381856custom 52425331556210607694

6 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈1,000 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

вышла продолжительность песен на спотифае… заглавка 2 минуты …..

custom 519525119639423818521custom 52942806352952260998custom 52355193537676249625custom 52425331556210607694

6 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC244 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

пожалуйста, не поленитесь, и пишите хорошие слова для ни-ки

custom 52425331556210607699custom 52355193537676249624

6 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC69 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @enorksaiPhoto

ENGENE ❕пожалуйста, обратите внимание на эту ситуацию и отправьте жалобу в хайб в сторис одного довольно известного японского инстаграм-креатора были опубликованы материалы с угрозами в адрес рики и его семьи. это очень серьезная ситуация, которую нельзя игнорировать. это не первый случай, когда этот человек пытается привлечь к себе внимание подобным образом. ранее он уже отправлял угрозы в адрес рики, а также неодн

custom 519525119639423818513

5 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC223 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

надеюсь вы помните, что у 02 есть этот шедевр, и как от4 передразнивали их 😭😭😭

custom 519525119639423818530custom 524253315562106076910custom 52942806352952260998custom 52355193537676249623

5 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC124 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @labheejayPhoto

(🥹)’’ —🖇️иногда достаточно одной невидимой нити, чтобы соединить миллионы людей. 🖇️ всё началось с одной идеи — показать энхайпен, что их музыка способна соединять сердца по всему миру. со временем эта идея превратилась в сотни историй, тысячи эмоций и один проект, созданный нашей общей любовью. сегодня мы хотим поблагодарить каждого из вас за участие в проекте CONNECTED BY THE RED THREAD. этот проект стал возможе

custom 519525119639423818511custom 52355193537676249625

5 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC221 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❗️❗️❗️

custom 52355193537676249624

5 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC275 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

вторую часть обзора мы вообще получили от девочек из айлит? 👀

custom 524253315562106076915custom 51952511963942381855custom 52355193537676249624custom 52942806352952260993

5 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC252 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

обзор энджинки хунвонки в the sin:bliss за 3 недели до релиза… 🤩

custom 529428063529522609922custom 51952511963942381858custom 52425331556210607698

5 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC261 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

не поленитесь и скопируйте хотя бы одну из предложенных фраз. в данный момент очень важно показать Ни-ки, что мы рядом с ним и очистить интернет нашими руками 😭

custom 519525119639423818514custom 52355193537676249624

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jayjakehoonz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 66,410 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 61 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ꪆৎ. ݁˖ 02𝚣 ⁷ life perfección 💗” (@jayjakehoonz), 848 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jayjakehoonz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.