Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jax × Ragatha confession

@jaxragathacf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

107subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002060063607
TypeChannel
Username@jaxragathacf
Descriptionэто Джекс × Рагата кф! можете воспринимать их как пейринг, друзей и, боже мой, жертву и абьюзера! бот — @jaxragathabot
Created21 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jaxragathacf

Growth

1077 August 2026 — 107 subscribers9 August 2026 — 107 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:17107no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:52107first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
493
Videos
62
Links
160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

253 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536871502987501462210842.7%
3513.8%
custom 53731514347390380393011.9%
💘2811.1%
custom 5366263101765202867197.51%
🔥114.35%
🥰62.37%
❤‍🔥51.98%
😍41.58%
👏20.791%
👍10.395%
😢10.395%
😭10.395%
🤔10.395%
🤷‍♀10.395%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 253reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2024 to 22 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈1,330 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 536871502987501462274

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈1,540 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

6custom 53687150298750146225custom 53731514347390380393🥰1

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈1,740 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53731514347390380398custom 53687150298750146227

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈1,810 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 53687150298750146229🔥5

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈2,170 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 536871502987501462284

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈2,130 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5368715029875014622205💘5❤‍🔥4🥰4

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈1,230 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Лол решил вам эдиты и мой арт скинуть 😇😇😇 Неанон:чупик🍔🍔🍔

custom 53687150298750146224💘3

22 Jun 2024, 01:15 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я РЕШИЛ ОЖИВИТЬ КФ ДА🆘🆘🆘 Кроче это мои хедканоны на РагатаЖаксов🦅🦅🦅 хедканон в том что зубл бы подарила Рагате лишнюю нахрен не сдавшиеся руку нашей Рагате, и она бы била по голове Жекса за проделки а зубл бы улюлюкала ему ЕЩЁ ХЕД В ТОМ ШТО ГЕНГЛ РИСУЕТ РАГАТАЖАКСОВ В СЕКРЕТЕ ДА💥💥💥 ещё есть хед что фиолетовый чмошник любит спать и в общем то лежать на ляжкпах и на коленок рагатки🧁🧁🧁 Неанон:чупик🍔🍔🍔 скора я вам нарису

custom 536871502987501462293

16 Jun 2024, 13:04 UTC≈1,020 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ЕЩЁ ОДИН ХЕДКАНОН ОДАААА хедканон в том что если бы в цифровом цирке был бы инет и телефон то Джекс бы точно деградировал в ютуб шортс и подходил бы к Рагате и говорил бы Какой твой любимый шкибиди туалет а))))))? И пел бы ей песни про сигму свинку и крипера и про школьника который получил двойку, и короночка он пел бы ей Сашка денчик шкебеде доп)))))))) ПХАХАХАХАХ ПРОСТИТЕ ПРОСТО В ЮТУБ ШОРТС СИДЕЛА И ПРИДУМАЛА ЭТР🍔

custom 53687150298750146226custom 537315143473903803964😍4🔥2💘1

16 Jun 2024, 13:01 UTC881 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Лол мой хедканон на РагатаДжаксы Рагата очень сильная женщина и может кинуть на прогиб кого хочет но та не делает патамушта всех любит🧁🧁🧁🧁 И ещё хед на то что Джекс любит кидаться во всех тортами😇😇😇 И на то что он постоянно получает подзатыльники от Рагатки😍😍😍 Неанон:чупик🧁🧁🧁 @jaxragathacf

custom 53687150298750146229custom 53731514347390380394💘1

28 May 2024, 13:45 UTC944 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кф умер, а я нет, лол :3 Поминаю рагаджексов Тгк: @vanyachchacha Чуч @jaxragathacf

custom 536871502987501462218custom 537315143473903803975💘1🔥1🤷‍♀1

26 May 2024, 05:17 UTC906 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

вы должны гордиться эмомдемсом❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥 неанон эмомдемс 🌈 @jaxragathacf

💘8custom 53687150298750146223👏2❤‍🔥1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @jaxragathacf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jax × Ragatha confession” (@jaxragathacf), 107 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jaxragathacf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.