Channel
@jarvisofficial001
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001552206127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jarvisofficial001 |
| Created | 22 February 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jarvisofficial001 |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 32 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 33 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 32 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 22 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,913 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,848 | 23.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,040 | 13.1% | |
| 🥰 | 1,029 | 13.0% | |
| 🤩 | 1,012 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 1,004 | 12.7% | |
| 🎉 | 988 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 963 | 12.2% | |
| 🤮 | 14 | 0.177% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 0.088% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.063% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.038% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,913 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2022 to 23 June 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
贾维斯工作室业务频道 pinned «🤖贾维斯代发🤖 🙊除了诚信和专业什么都没有的代发🙊 ➡️包月套餐价格表⬅️ ❌原套餐 VS ✅新套餐 ❌800/月 5个号 500个群 ✅700/月 25个广告号 2500个群 （另送20RMB在网站自助下单。兴龙网站的详情，请浏览 @xinglongsocial） ❌1500/月 10个广告号 1500个群 ✅1200/月 50个广告号 5000个群 （另送20RMB在网站自助下单。兴龙网站的详情，请浏览 @xinglongsocial） ❌2400/月 20个广告号…»
🤖贾维斯代发🤖 🙊除了诚信和专业什么都没有的代发🙊 ➡️包月套餐价格表⬅️ ❌原套餐 VS ✅新套餐 ❌800/月 5个号 500个群 ✅700/月 25个广告号 2500个群 （另送20RMB在网站自助下单。兴龙网站的详情，请浏览 @xinglongsocial） ❌1500/月 10个广告号 1500个群 ✅1200/月 50个广告号 5000个群 （另送20RMB在网站自助下单。兴龙网站的详情，请浏览 @xinglongsocial） ❌2400/月 20个广告号 3000个群 ✅2100/月 100个广告号 10000个群 （自动成为兴龙的金卡会员，享有7折优惠，另送50RMB在网站自助下单。兴龙网站的详情，请浏览 @xinglongsocial） ❌5800/月 100个广告号 10000++个群 ✅4200/月 200个广告号 20000++个群 （自动成为兴龙的黑卡会员…
🎉440👍437👏437🤩437🥰429🔥427❤395
#贾维斯通知 🔉🔉重大消息宣布‼️ 目前【贾维斯工作室】已与【兴龙-社交媒体一站式服务🌐】深度合作🎉🎉 【兴龙】 是一个可以自助下单的平台，各位可以在【兴龙网站】里自助购买各种类型的僵尸粉，刷浏览量，拉活人，克隆群，超级索引排名，购买成品老频道等等‼️ 【兴龙网站的优势】 对比 【市场外面的上粉服务等等】 ✅价格低至4.38元/1000人 ❌价格在30元以上 ✅平均1-3个小时就能完成 ❌速度1-3天才能完成 ✅可以指定不同国家的服务 ❌不能选择，什么国家都要接受 ✅Telegram服务高达几十种 ❌单一选择 ✅全球社交媒体服务超500种❌只有TG服务 除此之外还有TikTok，Youtube，Facebook，Instagram，Twitter，Discord等等的全球社交媒体‼️ 目前市场上的价格是1000人僵尸粉至少要30元以上，而我们的合作商 【兴龙-社交媒体一站式服务🌐】 1000人僵尸粉只卖…
🔥157🤩156🎉144🥰144❤135👏134👍130
🎺广告代发模式从转发更改为直发（优点：直发发送成功率高于转发，效果大于转发。缺点：不可看实时浏览量）
我们提供的业务服务 1️⃣代发 - 24小时不停机的刷 2️⃣引流粉丝到你频道或僵尸粉 3️⃣大量出售协议号/直登号 4️⃣指定群，拉人 5️⃣超级索引搜索提高你的排名【让更加多的人看到】 6️⃣私聊 我们已经掌握全TG最多的流量！24小时不停机发送，保证浏览量！曝光率帮你提高到极致，死号马上补号
贾维斯工作室于5月1号休假一天 需要续签的客户可以先提前续签，若有紧急状况的话可以随时联系客服。 @jarvisdaifa
🥰95🔥76❤71👏70🤩67👍66🎉58🤮2
由于TELEGRAM官方网络异常，所以导致全部广告暂停了一段时间，现已全部回复正常
👍10🤮5👎1
在此声明贾维斯工作室拒接一切盗U广告业务。 如有任何投诉声明实际业务与广告不符，例如：盗U，恶意软件等等。广告立即停止投放，费用恕不退回。 联系飞机号 @jarvisdaifa
👍927🔥88🥰78❤68🤩68👏63🎉62💩5
🖲贾维斯工作室是一个专业广告推广公司，我们的技术团队在成熟的技术下仍不断地继续研发，确保能为客户解决流量问题，让客户的业务遍布全网，让您的事业做大做强！联系 @jarvisdaifa 我们的业务服务 ✅24小时不停机投放 ✅定制专属服务器代发 ✅时刻观察代发效果 我们已经掌握了全TG最多的流量！24小时不停机投放，保证浏览量！您能看到我的代发那就代表别人也能看到您的业务！ 赶紧联系 @jarvisdaifa
👏300❤294🔥292🎉284🤩284🥰283👍268👎4
贾维斯代发每分每秒都在为您服务
🤮5
欢迎来到贾维斯工作室业务频道，在这里你能看到我们的业务信息，以后会开放更多的业务。 在这里我们也希望客户们都能解决流量问题，天天开单😄 想要了解更多，欢迎各位来咨询： @jarvisdaifa
👍10😁3💩1
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @jarvisofficial001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jarvisofficial001 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“贾维斯工作室业务频道” (@jarvisofficial001), 32 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jarvisofficial001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.