Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про инфобизнес для педагога

Channel

Про инфобизнес для педагога

@janinatarasova7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,354subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001297811550
TypeChannel
Username@janinatarasova7
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/janinatarasova7

Growth

2,3542,3652,359.57 August 2026 — 2,364 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,364 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,365 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,355 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,354 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,352–2,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:382,354-1
12 Aug 2026, 00:322,355-10
8 Aug 2026, 14:032,365+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:312,364no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:172,364first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.40%
avg views ÷ 2,354 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total932
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1583.3%
👍316.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Каждый канал как уютный дом с особой атмосферой. Загляните, авторы рады новым гостям. 💜Педагогический МЁД Уроки литературы для современных подростков: лайфхаки, рабочие листы, презентации. 💜Канал «Филолог в школе» предлагает методические материалы для 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 классов по русскому языку и литературе. У вас будут готовые материалы к урокам. 💜ПО-РУССКИ • ЕГЭ • ОГЭ Канал преподавателя, который сам каждые два

2

6 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сколько стоил мой путь от учителя начальных классов из Курска до лидера в области инфопродуктов для педагогов? Два года я училась без остановок. Потом — точечно брала то, что нужно именно сейчас. Итого: ≈ 3 000 000 ₽ на маркетинг, мышление, коучинг, стратегию. И это при том, что у меня уже были диплом колледжа и три высших. Зачем? Потому что я покупала время и опыт других людей. И до сих пор это делаю. Поэтому мне

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Просили — получите! На вебинаре «Система блога педагога» вы просили больше эфиров? Я услышала каждого! Завтра провожу закрытый эфир в VK Donut клуба «Маркетолог педагога». Тема: «5 ошибок в продажах в блоге педагога» Это те самые ошибки, которые вы совершаете КАЖДЫЙ ДЕНЬ — даже не подозревая, что теряете деньги прямо сейчас. Разберём всё по полочкам: ✅ Где «прячутся» ваши продажи ✅ Почему клиенты уходят, не купив

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC99 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Очень жду тех, кто готов к росту и пассивному доходу 🤍. Тех, кто не готов тоже ждем 🙏🏻 https://forms.yandex.ru/u/6a707a09e010db0c1e17c910

4 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC97 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @amteacher_tm

Поддерживаю, увольняюсь со школы благодаря курсу❤️ Теперь зарабатываю в блоге в несколько раз больше школьной зарплаты 🫶 Благодарю Янину и команду за это 🤍

4

4 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MelnikovaLesson

Очень хороший курс! Это вложение в ваше развитие!

3

4 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лето — отличное время для развития без оценок, спешки и лишнего стресса. Мы собрали для вас папку Telegram-каналов, где опытные педагоги и специалисты делятся полезными материалами, идеями для занятий, рекомендациями для родителей и помогают качественно подготовиться к школе, контрольным и экзаменам. 📩 Сохранить папку с каналами Подписывайтесь и сохраняйте подборку — здесь собраны знания, идеи и проверенные ресурс

2

4 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌊 Ваши знания стоят больше, чем вы думаете! Вы — учитель, репетитор, логопед, психолог или методист? Каждый день вы делитесь знаниями, помогаете детям и взрослым расти… а доход растёт медленнее, чем хочется? Ваши опыт может работать на вас — онлайн, этично и без выгорания. 📣 Открываю предзапись на курс «Инфопродукты и продажи»! Это практический курс для педагогов, которые хотят зарабатывать на своей экспертизе в ин

3

3 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC149 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

РЕКОРДНЫЙ ЗАПУСК ЗА ПОСЛЕДНИЕ ТРИ ГОДА! Сегодня целый день я была в мыслях о новом запуске: сколько человек мы можем взять, сколько сможем вместить внимания и дать результата. И чтобы ответить себе честно, я полезла анализировать летний поток… и у меня мурашки. Это лето стало самым сильным запуском за последние три года 🔥 И дело даже не в цифрах. Дело в том, что сейчас происходит в чате челленджа: Пока одни сомнева

1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @janinatarasova7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 404,471 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про инфобизнес для педагога” (@janinatarasova7), 2,354 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janinatarasova7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.