Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

jane

@janeryby

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003625421538
TypeChannel
Username@janeryby
Description❕it’s not information channel❕ start-27.02.26 info - twitter anon-@loverubyjane_bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/janeryby

Growth

336 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:0133no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:4833first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.7
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held11 (9 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total162
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
996
Videos
333
Links
38

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53773787262353808921126.8%
custom 5337247720052654210922.0%
717.1%
custom 538870298733187102749.76%
🍓49.76%
custom 529411238424639134824.88%
❤‍🔥24.88%
custom 543603412822921020612.44%
💋12.44%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC12 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤍дженни с командой columbia records на фестивале lollapalooza

3❤‍🔥2💋1

10 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

мне кажется примерно так всё и было ..

🍓1

10 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC12 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

режисёр "less than a lover" делится закадровыми фотками 🤩 Это сбывшаяся мечта — режиссировать этот фильм для Дженни. Благодарна за возможность творить вместе с тобой, Дж. Ура тебе и... В будущем вас ждут еще большие свершения. Ваша трудовая этика и видение заразительны и не имеют себе равных. Спасибо всем за любовь к LTAL. «Меньше, чем любовник» Дженни

custom 53372477200526542101custom 54360341282292102061

9 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

в начале эфира у девочек не ладилось с камерой и сначала лиса случайно спалила стаф следящий за ними , а затем стаф помогли девочкам - jennie’s reaction

2custom 53372477200526542102

9 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC14 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

-blackpink blackpink blackpink -blink blink blink !

custom 537737872623538089232

9 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

jeemin x ian x stella x anna x ella - cover on “as if it’s your last"

🍓3

9 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @chr_bpPhoto

💜 джису зашла в своё приложение и прокомментировала свои вчерашние слезы я видела, что многие люди были удивлены, потому что я плакала вчера! я тоже человек! не могу поверить, что я не робот 💕 новости о blackpink

custom 53372477200526542103

9 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

вчера у неё был прям тот самый вайб дженни в 18-20 году

custom 53773787262353808922

9 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

почему она такая слей

custom 53773787262353808922

9 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC15 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

креативный директор дженни charm la’donna делится впечатлениями и благодарственными словами к команде 💙 креативный директор @ jennierubyjane для её летних фестивалей 🤍 Я безмерно благодарна нашей невероятной команде, всем впечатлениям и каждому моменту, который мы смогли создать вместе этим летом. В воплощение каждого этапа в жизнь было вложено столько любви, труда и внимания. Благодарны всем, кто принимал в этом у

custom 53773787262353808924custom 53887029873318710274custom 53372477200526542103

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @janeryby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 292,792 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“jane” (@janeryby), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janeryby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.