Channel
@jalopy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
233subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001108034704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jalopy |
| Description | Куратор в ВШЭ. Ex-дизайн директор Газпром нефть, ex-дизайн директор Риа Новости и Россия Сегодня, ex-арт-директор Московские Новости Написать мне можно сюда: @absquenota |
| Created | 19 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jalopy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 233 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 233 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (18 April 2026 – 24 July 2026) |
| Views total | 10,200 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
77 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 61.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 23.4% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jalopy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 April 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Кажется, новый евро специально сделали таким, чтобы европа не пользовалась наличными Понимаю, насколько сейчас это неактуально, но всё же интересно поразмышлять о дизайне новых евро. Представлено девять вариантов, и, честно говоря, только один из них может получить оценку чуть выше трёх по пятибалльной шкале. Понятно, что никто не ждёт уровня швейцарского франка, но всё же хотелось бы увидеть что-то более убедител…
❤3👍3🍓1💔1
Очень долго не мог решиться выложить этот текст. На позапрошлой неделе я выступал на конференции, посвящённой AI. Этот текст выжимка из того, что мне хотелось донести до аудитории. И, как ни странно, оказалось, что выступать перед людьми гораздо легче, чем просто опубликовать написанное. Наверное, потому что текст остаётся и говорит за тебя ещё долго после того, как ты закончил. Но всё-таки решился. Читайте. Несовер…
❤18🔥5🕊1
В Москве, в Подколокольном переулке, открылся прекрасный книжный магазин «Озеро» Очень прошу всех туда зайти и просто насладиться. Мне кажется, это лучший книжный магазин Москвы. И так как я шесть лет прожил бок о бок с «Подписными изданиями», у меня есть ощущение, что Москва наконец обзавелась достойным восприемником Это место, куда надо приходить и где надо быть А еще я там, наконец, снова купил очередное издани…
❤🔥13❤7
В Европе холодно. В Италии темно. Власть отвратительна, как руки брадобрея. О, если б распахнуть, да как нельзя скорее, На Адриатику широкое окно. Над розой мускусной жужжание пчелы, В степи полуденной — кузнечик мускулистый. Крылатой лошади подковы тяжелы, Часы песочные желты и золотисты. На языке цикад пленительная смесь Из грусти пушкинской и средиземной спеси, Как плющ назойливый, цепляющийся весь, Он мужественно…
❤12❤🔥3
Когда в твоем канале меньше тысячи подписчиков
❤7❤🔥2😁1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @jalopy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что находится в тени статуи | Антон Степанов” (@jalopy), 233 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jalopy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.