Channel
@jahangard_academy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,023subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002408952169 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jahangard_academy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jahangard_academy |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 1,023 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 1,025 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 1,028 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 1,032 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 1,035 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 1,036 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 1,037 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 1,038 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 1,039 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 1,042 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 1,043 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 1,044 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 1,044 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه سؤال... تو هم از این چرخه خسته نشدی؟ اینکه هر روز به خودت قول بدی تغییر کنی اما دوباره همون رفتارها تکرار بشه؟ اگر واقعاً راهی وجود داشته باشه که بفهمی ریشه این اتفاقات کجاست... دوست داری حداقل یک بار حقیقتش رو بدونی؟ 👇👇👇👇 @jahangard_academy_support
همه فکر میکنن... «من اراده ندارم» «آدم تنبلی هستم» «مشکل از خودمه» اما... شاید اصلاً مشکل از تو نباشه... شاید فقط ذهنت، به شکلی کار میکنه که هیچوقت یاد نگرفتی چطور باهاش کنار بیای.
تا حالا شده... صبح که از خواب بیدار میشی هنوز هیچ کاری نکردی اما از همون اول، احساس خستگی، بیحوصلگی یا بیانگیزگی داشته باشی؟ یا آخر شب، از دست خودت عصبانی باشی... که چرا نتونستی خودتو کنترل کنی... چرا حرفی رو زدی که نباید میزدی... یا رفتاری کردی که بعدش پشیمون شدی؟ شاید هم بارها تصمیم گرفتی قرآن بخونی یا حفظش کنی اما هر بار، یه چیزی مانعت شده...
اگر قرار باشه حالِ یک روزمون عوض بشه باید از همون جایی شروع کنیم که روزمون شکل میگیره. توی این ویدئو، درباره قانونی صحبت کردم که اگر جدی بگیری نگاهت به اتفاقهای هر روزت عوض میشه. ویدئو رو ببین بعد برگرد همینجا و بهم بگو: کدوم بخشش بیشتر به دلت نشست؟ 👇👇👇👇👇 @jahangard_academy_support
از این اتفاق برای شما هم افتاده؟ یه اتفاق تلخ از اول صبح که احساس کردی کل روزت رو تحت تأثیر قرار داده؟ اون روز چه حسی داشتی؟ و برای اینکه حالت بهتر بشه، چه کاری انجام دادی؟ شاید تجربه تو، گره ذهن یکی دیگه رو باز کنه ... 👇👇👇👇👇 @jahangard_academy_support
شاید مشکل این نباشه که صبح یه اتفاق بد افتاده... مشکل اینه که ما همون اتفاق رو تا آخر شب، همراه خودمون میکشیم... ذهنمون مدام داره همون صحنه رو تکرار میکنه... و هر بار، حال دلمون بدتر میشه.
دیگه هر اتفاق کوچیکی اعصابتو بههم میریزه... زودتر عصبانی میشی حوصله هیچکس رو نداری اشتباهاتت بیشتر میشه تمرکزت کمتر میشه و آخر شب با خودت میگی: «امروز چرا اینقدر روز بدی بود؟»
دیدی بعضی روزها از همون اول صبح، با یه اوقاتتلخی شروع میشه یا یه دعوا یا یه خبر بد یا یه پیام ناراحتکننده بعد انگار کل روز، دیگه روی دورِ بد میافته...
امروز یک ویدئو براتون آماده کردم که دقیقاً درباره همین موضوع صحبت کردم. اینکه چرا بعضی ورودیها، آرامآرام تمرکز، آرامش و کیفیت فکر کردن ما را از بین میبرند. بعد از دیدن ویدئو، حتماً برام بنویس: فکر میکنی از امروز باید در ورودیهای ذهنت چه تغییری ایجاد کنی؟
❤1
گاهی خودِ خبر واقعاً مهمه... اما خیلی وقتها، مشکل اصلی «حجم ورودیهای ذهن» ماست. هنوز خبر اول تموم نشده... خبر دوم... تحلیل سوم... شایعه چهارم... و مغز، مدام در حالت آمادهباش باقی میمونه.
❤2
شاید فکر کنی فقط چند دقیقه خبر خوندی... اما ذهن انسان بین «اتفاق واقعی» و «خبر یک اتفاق» تفاوت زیادی قائل نیست. برای همین، گاهی فقط با چند دقیقه دنبال کردن اخبار، شایعات یا محتواهای پراسترس... ضربان قلبت بالا میره تمرکزت کمتر میشه و ذهنت تا ساعتها درگیر همون موضوع میمونه.
👍1
خیلی وقتها فکر میکنیم فضای مجازی یا دنبال کردن اخبار، باعث میشه حواسمون از مشکلات پرت بشه... اما همیشه اینطور نیست. بعضی ورودیها، به جای اینکه ذهنمون رو آروم کنن فقط بارِ ذهنمون رو سنگینتر میکنن.
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jahangard_academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فکر می کنید شما جزء کدوم گروه هستید؟
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرتضی جهانگرد | حفظ قرآن کریم” (@jahangard_academy), 1,023 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jahangard_academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.