Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

JackSparrow's Launches

@jacksparrowcall

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

310subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001788591440
TypeChannel
Username@jacksparrowcall
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 1 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jacksparrowcall

Growth

3107 Aug 2026, 02:17 — 310 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:31 — 310 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:177 Aug 2026, 22:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 309–311 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 22:31310no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:17310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2033.9%
👍1627.1%
🔥1322.0%
35.08%
🥰35.08%
👎23.39%
😈23.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2022 to 30 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2024, 08:53 UTC≈4,560 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

??? https://t.me/+LSTNRAu9KsQ5ODEx

🔥2😈2

Signed JackSparrow

8 Apr 2024, 11:49 UTC≈6,570 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

NEW LAUNCH VERY SOON...👀

3

Signed JackSparrow owner of @JackSparrowcall

8 May 2023, 18:29 UTC≈9,490 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I missed the recap for this one. ATH was 1.3M after a big dip, x5 from the call and now sitting at 180k. Let’s reverse this one New TG: https://t.me/Landwolf_Community

6👍2👎2

Signed JackSparrow owner of @JackSparrowcall

19 Apr 2023, 21:34 UTC≈8,820 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

PEPEBF🟠 PEPE DEV BOUGHT 1 ETH tx https://etherscan.io/address/0x594a839beb49986ff8e4b321c7e29ee8813c6fd5 CHART https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xdb9df6fdb2c525992b5908ed8ea542782162940a 260k EDIT TG https://t.me/LandWolfErc20

2

Signed JackSparrow owner of @JackSparrowcall

19 Apr 2023, 20:43 UTC≈6,900 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

MEME SEASON IS BACK?👀🏴‍☠️

Signed JackSparrow owner of @JackSparrowcall

14 Oct 2022, 12:23 UTC≈7,630 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥74👍4

Signed JackSparrow owner of @JackSparrowcall

13 Apr 2022, 19:47 UTC≈9,770 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/TheLastApeStanding

1

Signed ꧁༺Average𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙮𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠༻꧂

12 Apr 2022, 14:02 UTC≈9,170 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🟡 Experienced team - aping a bag here - incoming marketing pushes ! 🐰🤪💎Elon’s Mental Bunny💎🤪🐰 Launched yesterday on the BSC, held the floor overnight between 12-15k MC. This Gem is set to explode, chart is bullish, community is STRONG and full of Diamond hands insistent on sending this to the MOON. Heaps of Marketing set to roll out throughout the day, you DO NOT want to miss this gem at a low MC. Dev is based a

👍3

Signed ꧁༺Average𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙮𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠༻꧂

10 Apr 2022, 19:19 UTC≈7,200 viewsread 7 August 2026

8K mc > 43K mc ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Signed ꧁༺Average𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙮𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠༻꧂

10 Apr 2022, 18:24 UTC≈7,460 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ShiBuyInu just launched without private holders, instead doing a fair launch - they want to topple cmc 🤩🤩🤩 Let's give a helping hand ✋️ Current 8K mc https://t.me/ShiBuyInu https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xbe57e19b58b42161ca830ebeb509ff5ed9b0d98e Liquidity is locked: https://www.pinksale.finance/#/pinklock/record/47103?chain=BSC Our contract: 0xbE57E19B58b42161ca830eBeb509fF5Ed9B0d98e

1

Signed ꧁༺Average𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙮𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠༻꧂

9 Apr 2022, 12:50 UTC≈6,180 viewsread 7 August 2026

Choosing in 10 mins 👀 - picked 4 winners 🏆 one more to come 👀👀 Comment here ❤️❤️

Signed ꧁༺Average𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙮𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙠༻꧂

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jacksparrowcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,306,981 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JackSparrow's Launches” (@jacksparrowcall), 310 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jacksparrowcall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.