Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jack/on/AI

@jackonai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

795subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003810095082
TypeChannel
Username@jackonai
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 20 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jackonai

Growth

795796795.57 Aug 2026, 18:55 — 796 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:45 — 796 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:07 — 795 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:558 Aug 2026, 03:07
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 795–796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:07795-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:45796no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:55796first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.5%
avg views ÷ 795 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held18 (20 March 202619 July 2026)
Views total258
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3934.8%
🔥1816.1%
🤯1513.4%
👍1311.6%
👏65.36%
🤔54.46%
👌32.68%
🙏32.68%
👎21.79%
💯21.79%
😢21.79%
🥰21.79%
10.893%
❤‍🔥10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jackonai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC258 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💸 Интенсив по вайбкодингу, где вам платят за обучение Мне нужны 1-2 вайбкодера в команду. Я решил провести интенсив: отберу на него 5 человек, обучу на реальных задачах, а лучших найму в команду. Что важно: ⚡️Интенсив будет длиться месяц. Со второй недели начнем оплачивать потраченное время ($5/час) 🏆 Тем, кто пройдёт до конца - оффер с вилкой $3–5k/мес + возможность релокации 👌🏼Опыт в айти - преимущество, но

🔥5🤯21🤔1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

5 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC405 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ищем несколько АИ-креаторов в команду под масштабный проект. Во что нужно уметь: Higgsfield, ElevenLabs, работа с персонажами, консистентность. Что важно: работа в команде, по нашему пайплайну. Студии рассмотрим, но лучше инди-специалисты. Вилка дохода: $2-4к/месяц Портфолио/шоурилы в личку @deepstone14

1🤔1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

26 May 2026, 15:45 UTC743 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ищем человека с техническим бекграундом и аналитическим складом ума, который займётся ускорением HFT-торговли. ФТ позиция, высокая ЗП и очень крутое менторство. Важно уметь разбираться в устройстве сложных тех. систем даже без полного доступа к исходникам и документации — по поведению, логам, сетевым следам, задержкам и косвенным признакам. Хорошее понимание сетей, latency, TCP/UDP и low-level инфраструктуры будет

1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

7 May 2026, 21:50 UTC928 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вас посещают тревожные мысли на тему AI и того, что будет дальше - посмотрите. Очень информативный разбор личностей главной технологической гонки нашего века. https://youtu.be/sxnN_CDTygM?is=ICkWqZGq9p7wD8XW ➡️Jack/on/AI⬅️

🔥4👏1🥰1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

12 Apr 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,380 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👾Нейронку Anthropic обсуждают на экстренных совещаниях в ФРС, Минфине США и Банке Англии 27 марта я писал про Mythos - тогда инфа утекла случайно. Теперь всё официально, и масштаб серьёзнее, чем кто-либо ожидал. 7 апреля Anthropic выпустили Claude Mythos Preview и сразу закрыли доступ. Модель получили только ~50 организаций: Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Nvidia и тд. Для обычных пользователей — ничего. Ни по AP

🤯42👍1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

3 Apr 2026, 22:50 UTC≈1,040 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, что лавочка OpenClaw с подпиской Claude прикроется окончательно😢

👍5😢2

Signed Jack Khrapkov

1 Apr 2026, 14:02 UTC988 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как поднять своего OpenClaw агента за 2 минуты без навыков, терминала и других за*бов Думаю не стоит объяснять, что OpenClaw - это огромный прорыв и вообще практически магия👾 Если вы еще не пробовали делегировать таким агентам свои рутинные задачи - советую начать «дружиться» с ними как можно скорее, пока точка входа в это максимально простая. Сегодня расскажу про самый быстрый способ поднятия своего OpenClaw аге

3

Signed Jack Khrapkov

27 Mar 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,170 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👾Anthropic готовит новые нейронки - Mythos и Capybara, и их пока не выпускают в паблик, тк это угроза для глобальной кибербезопасности. По заявлениям компании Mythos способна находить уязвимости быстрее, чем их успевают закрывать. И речь не про навайбкоденные проекты, а про те у которых миллионы юзеров😭 В Capybara будет до 10 триллионов параметров и, судя по всему, это будет самая дорогая АИ модель в истории. Это

6🤯4👍3🔥2

Signed Jack Khrapkov

26 Mar 2026, 13:14 UTC847 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Еще есть запрос на создание АИ мультсериала Кейс: Международное агенство по подбору домашнего персонала в HNW семьи. Необходимо сгенерить персонажей по ТЗ и произвести 5 вертикальных серий по 2 минуты. Если вы или знакомые такое делают - кидайте портфолио и сразу ценовой диапазон по этой задаче @deepstone14

3👏2🔥2

Signed Jack Khrapkov

24 Mar 2026, 13:23 UTC950 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

5👏1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

24 Mar 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,420 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👾Вайб-кодинг без дыр. Мини-гайд для начинающих. Если вы недавно начали вайбкодить или только планируете начать - прочитайте. Немного базы, которая может спасти вас и ваших будущих юзеров. ЕСЛИ ТОЛЬКО НАЧИНАЕТЕ ЧТО-ТО СОЗДАВАТЬ, то поймите 3 базовые вещи. Проговорите их с нейронкой до разработки, когда обсуждаете концепт. Убедитесь, что вы можете ответить себе чётко на все три вопроса: Вопрос 1: Где живут данные?

5👍3🙏3❤‍🔥1🤯1

Signed Jack Khrapkov

23 Mar 2026, 19:34 UTC869 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Еще важный момент - костыль может не работать на MacOS локально, если ваш Claude Code кладёт свои OAuth ключи в Keychain. На VPS и Windows все работает стабильно. Решение простое - не давать клоду класть их в Keychain Сам клод подскажет, как это сделать. Если не получится - тоже пишите, обсудим

🤯4👌3🤔2

Signed Jack Khrapkov

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jackonai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jack/on/AI” (@jackonai), 795 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jackonai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.