Channel
@j_savina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
291subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001532803397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @j_savina |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/j_savina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 291 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 294 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 294 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 153 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 88.9% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @j_savina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Признаюсь, у меня в заметках телефона годами копится свалка цитат — из книг, постов, разговоров, и даже с рекламного щита в аэропорту. Никому их не показывала — просто сохраняла себе. Решила, что хватит держать это при себе. Начинаю рубрику с цитатами — теми, что нравятся мне самой. И которыми иногда делюсь с друзьями. Первая — от Карла Поппера. Держу её в голове с тех пор, как прочитала — потому что вечно ловлю …
❤4
Я бы людям с напряжённым рабочим графиком отпуск прописывала сразу на год. Рядом со стратегическими сессиями, запусками и налогами. Потому что у меня первые два-три дня никакого отпуска обычно не происходит. Я физически уже уехала, но мой внутренний маховик ещё несётся где-то по Москве. Как я всё бросила? Почему именно сейчас? Что там происходит без меня? Кто что не сделал? И почему мне кажется, что именно в эту не…
❤2
Бренды перестают рассказывать о своей ценности и начинают встраивать её в продукт В маркетинге всё заметнее тенденция: сильные бренды перестают относиться к каждому запуску как к самостоятельному событию и превращают его в очередную главу истории, которую аудитория уже знает. Новая VIRGINIA Adistar Jellyfish Triple White от adidas и Pharrell Williams — не просто очередная расцветка кроссовок, а продолжение развиваю…
❤2
Знаете, как вообще образуются звёзды? Сначала нет никакой звезды. Есть огромное облако газа и пыли — холодное, разрозненное, почти бесформенное. В нём нет ни света, ни центра, на которую потом будут смотреть люди и сочинять мифы. Но в какой-то момент под действием гравитации это облако начинает сжиматься. Плотность растёт, температура повышается, давление становится всё сильнее. И когда оно достигает нужной силы, ха…
💯1
Сегодня LEGO представила коллекционный набор по мотивам «Секретных материалов»: кабинет Малдера, лесную сцену с НЛО, восемь минифигурок и множество узнаваемых деталей. В наборе 1478 элементов, он предназначен для аудитории 18+ и будет стоить $199,99. По сути, взрослым предлагают купить не конструктор, а возможность ненадолго вернуться в мир, частью которого они когда-то себя ощущали. Первоначальную идею предложил по…
Если человек доволен своей жизнью, имеем ли мы право считать, что он живёт неправильно, только потому, что сами никогда не выбрали бы такой путь? О книге «Человек-комбини» я слышала от участников нескольких книжных клубов, встречала её в блогах знакомых и в итоге купила себе в отпуск. Читается она за два-три дня, если вы отдыхаете с детьми, и за один вечер, если вам доступна такая почти мифологическая роскошь, как п…
Обычный воскресный лонг? Не совсем! Вместе с Никитой Филипповым пробежали 15 километров, обсудили тренировки, сделали памятные фотографии с олимпийской медалью и, конечно, подкрепились батончиками Bionova. Надеемся, это утро запомнится вам так же, как и нам! До новых пробежек🤍
Вчера писала, что реклама работает лучше всего не на баннере, а внутри чьей-то жизни. Вот как это выглядит на практике. Воскресный лонг, который был организован для бренда Bionova: 15 километров с Никитой Филипповым, его олимпийская медаль, которую подержал в руках каждый, и батончики на финише — как часть классного утра)
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @j_savina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Внимание на заказ” (@j_savina), 291 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/j_savina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.