Channel
@izovsechsil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001774631066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @izovsechsil |
| Description | Кинематограф. Фотография. Музыка |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/izovsechsil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 36 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 35 | 47.9% | |
| custom 5377673704589247745 | 12 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5312193015446522811 | 8 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5386595575728721743 | 6 | 8.22% | |
| custom 5375584215884648837 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| custom 5318958830183275561 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| custom 5386792349655388337 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| custom 5310136589400169037 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| custom 5312527769492542619 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| custom 5375503612233402660 | 1 | 1.37% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 24 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Damaged Negatives of Kate Moss, 1990s — ph. Glen Luchford
🔥4custom 53189588301832755613custom 53101365894001690371custom 53125277694925426191custom 53755036122334026601custom 53776737045892477451
Слёзы
🔥4custom 53121930154465228111
KITH и HBO выпустили капсульную коллекцию, посвященную «Клану Сопрано». Главной звездой кампэйна стал актер Майкл Империоли — Кристофер «Крисси» Молтисанти
🔥3custom 53776737045892477451
Если вы не знаете что такое Tiny Desk, то ещё не поздно исправить ситуацию и начать рекомендую с Мака Миллера, невероятно кайфую пересматривая, как в первый раз несколько лет назад. Классный момент- аккомпанирует Маку Стивен Ли Брунер, более известный как Thundercat. P.S. На самом деле этот пост лишь повод наставить реактов с Миллером
custom 53121930154465228115custom 53776737045892477454🔥2
Раким и Маргарет Куолли в проморолике Chanel в преддверии новой коллекции. Выглядит круто и немного странно (так и должно быть) P.S. Считаю что ASAP больший вклад делает в мир поп культуры не своей музыкой, а выступая связующим звеном мира большой моды и хип-хопа
custom 53865955757287217435🔥3custom 53776737045892477452
Все просили, и наконец оно свершилось. Теперь тут больше 1 реакции 🤯
🔥5custom 53755842158846488374custom 53776737045892477454custom 53121930154465228112custom 53867923496553883372custom 53865955757287217431
Ирина Шейк для нового выпуска журнала The Face. @xmondrianx
🔥5
*здесь могла быть умная подпись*
🔥4
@matveymatyushkin не просил, но я сделал.
🔥5
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @izovsechsil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Изо всех сил не растерялся 🍿” (@izovsechsil), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/izovsechsil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.