Channel
@izorrobzorov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
75subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001525962484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @izorrobzorov |
| Description | Канал о самых интересных новостях гастрономического мира и популярных заведениях Москвы |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/izorrobzorov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 75 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:40 | 75 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 31 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 14 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продолжаем рубрику пасхальных шедевров 🧁 Дизайнер Денис Симачёв создал кулич с начинкой «дубайский шоколад» с лесными ягодами. Шапочка кулича представляет собой купол с крестом. Купить можно за 15000₽ в ресторане Simach. 🧁 Eggsellent придумали кулич в стиле барбикюр: тесто с большим количеством сливочного масла и апельсиновыми цукатами, крем на основе белого шоколада, и превосходно сияющая розовая помадка (2390₽) …
🔥2👍1
«Поехали!» ➡️ что интересного пробовать в День космонавтики в московских заведениях: 🚀 ресторан Yura, названный в честь великого космонавта до 13 апреля предлагает попробовать специальный сет (4300₽), вдохновленный любимыми блюдами семьи Гагарина. 🚀 «Чайковский» приготовил специальный десерт «Космос» (620₽), состоящий из бисквитной основы с орехом пекан, нежного креме из горького шоколада и мусса с копченой ванилью…
👍2😍2🕊1
🐣 Лухари Пасха Мировые новости: ⚡️ Louis Vuitton выпустили шоколадные яйца за 20 тысяч рублей. Пасхальный десерт выполнен в виде культовой сумки Egg Bag. Переходим к местным новостям: ⚡️ Кофемания предлагает готовый пасхальный набор за скромные 43 тысячи рублей. В корзинку входят: кулич, два шоколадных зайца, несколько шоколадных яиц, драже и даже церковные свечи. ⚡️ Ресторан «Пушкинъ» открыл предзаказ на куличи…
👍1🔥1😐1
🌳 Березовый вайб от Шоколадницы Шоколадница выкатила три весенних напитка: 🎈 «Береза в цвету» (300мл/270₽) - многослойный холодный кофейный напиток с березовым соком, фирменной сырной пеной и сахарным сиропом 🎈 Кулер «Слезки березки» (300мл/270₽) - сочетание чистого березового сока, фирменной сырной пены и льда напоминает кислородный коктейль в стиле «рустик» 🎈 Бамбл «Береза» (300мл/270₽) - в составе берёзовый со…
🔥2
Спешу рассказать вам про вчерашний ужин в Frank by Basta. Начну с того, что забронировать столик я пытался с января, вспоминая о планах на выходные в пятницу, когда вся бронь уже расписана. В итоге просто пришел и нас разместили по живой очереди. Мяса в чистом виде не сильно хотелось, поэтому решено было ужинать бургерами: 🍔 Фрэнкбургер с реберным мясом (720₽) - интересная позиция за счет рваного мяса вместо котлет…
❤1🔥1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @izorrobzorov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@izorrobzorov named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZorroBzorov - канал о вкусной еде🍕🧁🍵🍹” (@izorrobzorov), 75 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/izorrobzorov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.