Channel
@iziboths1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
387subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001490377484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iziboths1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iziboths1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 387 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 387 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
385 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 344 | 89.4% | |
| 👎 | 41 | 10.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2023 to 2 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Это больше, чем Украина. Это война за свободу, и мы должны ее выиграть. (…). Когда Китай заявил, что собирается захватить Гонконг, они это сделали. Россия сказала, что они собираются вторгнуться в Украину, мы наблюдали, как это произошло. Китай говорит, что Тайвань – следующий, и нам лучше ему поверить. Россия cказала, что Польша и страны Балтии будут следующими. Если это произойдет, мы столкнемся с мировой войной (……
👍47👎15
Европейское единство было мечтой нескольких человек. Оно стало надеждой для многих. Сейчас это необходимость для всех нас. Конрад Аденауэр
👍38👎2
Многие критики обвиняют капитализм в упадке литературы. Скорее им следует пенять на свое неумение отличать белое от черного. Да и могут ли они считать себя более проницательными, чем, скажем, их предшественники сто лет назад? Сегодня, к примеру, критики очень высоко отзываются о Стендале. Но в 1842 году он умер, так и оставшись неизвестным и непонятым современниками. Капитализм сумел сделать массы достаточно состоят…
👍48
А если серьезно - большим успехом российских консерваторов стало создание образа некоего «движения ЛГБТ». Естественно никакого ЛГБТ-движения в реальности нет. Ну а что это? Все представители ЛГБТ, даже консерваторы типа Майло Яннопулоса и, прости господи, Антона Красовского? Или все защитники представителей ЛГБТ, включая гетеро? Но это же максимально дезорганизованная и абстрактная группа людей. В реальности есть т…
👍15👎6
Те, кто слушал докладчиков XII Чтений Адама Смита, наверняка помнят доклад известного экономиста-железнодорожника к.э.н. Фарида Хусаинова "Железнодорожная отрасль и невидимая рука рынка". Так вот, в октябре у него вышла книжка, посвящённая железнодорожном тарифам, одна из глав которой как раз базируется на идеях того доклада. Ниже по ссылке небольшое 10-минутное интервью Ф. Хусаинова, где он рассказывает вкратце об э…
👍9
Чем больше гражданских лиц, обладающих высокой квалификацией, носит оружие, тем больше шансов предотвратить теракт, избежать жертв или сократить их количество. Гилад Эрдан
👍42👎3
#Инфографика Политические репрессии в СССР. Количество наказанных по статье «контрреволюционная деятельность».
👍23
На самом деле существует множество важных вопросов, по которым почти все профессиональные экономисты согласны. Грег Мэнкью, профессор Гарварда и автор ведущего учебника по экономике, несколько лет назад предоставил список в своем блоге. Вот некоторые из них (цифры в скобках обозначают процент экономистов, согласных с этим утверждением). 1. Потолок арендной платы снижает количество и качество доступного жилья. (93%)…
👍14
Европейские ценности Инфографика основана на отчёте Евробарометра, системе статистики отношения жителей Евросоюза по различным вопросам. Так что тут стоить иметь ввиду конкретную направленность на ЕС, а не Европу как культурную общность или цивилизацию. Однако и так результаты интересны. В первую очередь тем, что они вполне очевидны. Европейцы хотят мира, они ценят демократию и права человека. Однако если Евросоюз …
👍7👎2
Великое слово «свобода» этот народ заменил произволом и полученную вольность претворил в буйство, грабёж и убийства. Петр Врангель
👍36👎4
Портрет Калвина Кулиджа. Автор Джозеф Берджесс.
👍13
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iziboths1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого вы бы поддержали
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2023 to 2 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,391,707 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@iziboths1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дети свободы” (@iziboths1), 387 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iziboths1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.