У меня соц опрос в тгк. Смотрели ли вы видео отюбера "Томатик" С названием "НИКОГДА не скачивайте эту версию Minecraft..." Если да то как вы думаете. Кто озвучил Хэлпи. Лично я думаю сейчас что это ии #опрос
☃1

Channel
@ivina_s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004466037794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ivina_s |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ivina_s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 25 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 560 |
| Reactions total | 161 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
161 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 39 | 24.2% | |
| custom 5469961384865338562 | 25 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5469670594104565998 | 21 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5346074607990379766 | 17 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5469891364013514909 | 17 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5469774407759075832 | 13 | 8.07% | |
| custom 5469757056091201255 | 7 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5469941894303749248 | 7 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5348371749773807928 | 4 | 2.48% | |
| custom 5348281942007648242 | 3 | 1.86% | |
| custom 5348475219830936432 | 2 | 1.24% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.24% | |
| custom 5230976592628436911 | 1 | 0.621% | |
| custom 5235541820741536863 | 1 | 0.621% | |
| custom 5345981879646457516 | 1 | 0.621% | |
| custom 5348041380889398700 | 1 | 0.621% |
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У меня соц опрос в тгк. Смотрели ли вы видео отюбера "Томатик" С названием "НИКОГДА не скачивайте эту версию Minecraft..." Если да то как вы думаете. Кто озвучил Хэлпи. Лично я думаю сейчас что это ии #опрос
☃1
Ладно. Держите спидпеинт. Сегодня рисую говарда (опять) Качество скушоли #видео
☃2
Мне понравилось сидеть к звонке говард конфешен. Респект💜
custom 53483717497738079283☃2custom 53482819420076482421custom 53484752198309364321
Channel photo updated
ГОВАРД В ЧУЛКАХ. УДАЛИТЕ!!!!! #скетч #говард
custom 54696705941045659984☃2custom 52309765926284369111custom 52355418207415368631custom 54697744077590758321
Ну что.. Завтра говард в чулочках
☃2custom 53460746079903797661custom 54698913640135149091
В цвете делать мне лень. Я заколебусь поправлять штрихи рваные..🌟 Давайте реакции мне и репосты пшшш #видео
☃5custom 54697744077590758323custom 53460746079903797662custom 54696705941045659982custom 53459818796464575161custom 53482819420076482421custom 53483717497738079281custom 54699613848653385621
-а вы знали. Что способности создателя этого канала ограничиваются не только рисунками всратыми?? Но ещё и всратыми анимациями🤤 #спилер
custom 54699613848653385623custom 54697570560912012552☃1custom 53460746079903797661custom 53480413808893987001custom 53482819420076482421custom 53484752198309364321custom 54698913640135149091
Сегодня рисуем кошко девочек.. А завтра говорда в чулочках...🥺 Я не шучу.
☃3custom 54696705941045659982
Дайте ей имя а я вам ничего не дам. А то кошковна странно☺️
custom 54699418943037492485custom 54696705941045659982custom 54697570560912012552custom 54699613848653385622☃1
#скетч
custom 54697744077590758324custom 53460746079903797663☃2custom 54696705941045659982
И что этн #скетч
custom 54696705941045659984☃3custom 54697744077590758323custom 54698913640135149093custom 54699613848653385621
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ivina_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 802,710 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рест💧 KSEO/IVIS” (@ivina_s), 25 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivina_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.