3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 19:46
151
no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:07
151
-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:01
152
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
171
Videos
72
Links
96
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7m 26s
Average length
1m 52s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
117 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💘
20
17.1%
🍓
19
16.2%
💅
14
12.0%
custom 5249195667804409751
13
11.1%
custom 5334938453576546786
12
10.3%
custom 5381806017178791788
9
7.69%
custom 5224737658709754583
8
6.84%
custom 5379555235272353746
7
5.98%
custom 5398038072979911471
6
5.13%
custom 5382184231998877275
4
3.42%
custom 5377851632199419243
2
1.71%
custom 5382277394134493052
2
1.71%
custom 5334602698803150897
1
0.855%
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🪦📸🎀𝗂𝘃𝗲𝗍𝗍α 𝗆𝗶𝗼🎀▫️🪦
🪦🥹🎀 𝗷𝗈𝘂𝗿𝗇𝗮𝗅𝗶𝗌𝘁 🎀🌟🪦
🎀➿🎀➖🎀➿🎀
🪦⌛️🎀мне передали🎀🥹🪦
🪦🎀эстафету 🎀🪦
🎀➿🎀➖🎀➿🎀
🪦▫️суть эстафеты заключается в том,чтобы в течении этого дня писали все,что хотите,скрывая все под спойлер. на следующий день надо все прочитать 🎀🪦
🎀➿🎀▫️ ➿ ▫️🎀➿🎀
🪦💭 🎀приняла от:@mirejour🎀🪦
передаю: @LOCKSH1FT & @BESTIES_OI
🪦📜🎀𝗂𝘃𝗲𝗍𝗍α 𝗆𝗶𝗼🎀▫️🪦
🪦🥹🎀 𝗷𝗈𝘂𝗿𝗇𝗮𝗅𝗶𝗌𝘁 🎀🌟🪦
🎀➿🎀➖🎀➿🎀
🪦⌛️🎀𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜🎀🎀🪦
🪦🎀🎀чᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋᴏᴇ🎀💭🪦
🪦🎀 ᴏнᴧᴀйн индуᴄᴛᴩия🎀🪦
🎀➿🎀➖🎀➿🎀
🤍🎀 что такое ои?🎀
🖤🎀 кем можно с ней стать?🎀
🎀➿🎀▫️ ➿ ▫️🎀➿🎀
🪦🏛🎀@𝖫𝗼𝗼𝗇𝗲𝗒𝟦𝟢🎀🥹🪦
🪦📜🎀𝗂𝘃𝗲𝗍𝗍α 𝗆𝗶𝗼🎀▫️🪦
🪦🥹🎀 𝗷𝗈𝘂𝗿𝗇𝗮𝗅𝗶𝗌𝘁 🎀🌟🪦
🎀➿🎀➖🎀➿🎀
🪦⌛️🎀𝑁𝑒𝑤 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜🎀🎀🪦
🪦🎀🎀нᴇ дᴇᴧᴀйᴛᴇ,ᴨᴏᴋᴀ🎀💭🪦
🪦💭🎀нᴇ ᴄдᴇᴧᴀᴇʍ МЫ🎀🥹🪦
🎀➿🎀➖🎀➿🎀
🤍🎀 почему многим может🎀
🎀прийти одна и та же идея? 🎀
🖤🎀 почему автора задело?🎀
🤍 🎀вывод🎀
🎀➿🎀▫️ ➿ ▫️🎀➿🎀
🪦🏛🎀@𝖫𝗼𝗼𝗇𝗲𝗒𝟦𝟢🎀🥹🪦
не знаю,можно ли это назвать небольшим подкастом,но тут то,что со мной случилось полностью. Надеюсь на ваше понимае
ДИСКЛЕЙМЕР:: я не выпрашиваю этим у кого-то поддержки,помощи,не давлю на жалость. хочется быть честной и просто поделиться с вами тем,что причина моего неактива обоснована
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ivettooo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 374,246 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД𝂅ׄ ⊹ ℐ𝗏𝗲𝗆𝗺α 𝗠𝗂ꪮ𝂅ׄ” (@ivettooo), 151 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivettooo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.