Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 27

Channel

27

@iuof276

Not marked by Telegram, checked 1 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

425subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002229971857
TypeChannel
Username@iuof276
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/iuof276

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

41342942131 August 2026 — 429 subscribers31 August 2026 — 429 subscribers16 September 2026 — 426 subscribers1 October 2026 — 423 subscribers12 October 2026 — 416 subscribers19 October 2026 — 413 subscribers26 October 2026 — 422 subscribers2 November 2026 — 425 subscribers42531 August 20262 November 2026
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411–431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 21:37425+3
26 Oct 2026, 16:31422+9
19 Oct 2026, 11:51413-3
12 Oct 2026, 21:46416-7
1 Oct 2026, 11:38423-3
16 Sept 2026, 17:56426-3
31 Aug 2026, 11:15429no change
31 Aug 2026, 11:01429first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥741.2%
💋529.4%
👍317.6%
⚡15.88%
👎15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC95 viewsread 31 August 2026

غراب وگلت نورس ردت احَليك اول مرة اجامل ، زلة لسان

20 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC102 viewsread 31 August 2026

بالسادس لاتحب ولا مادة ادرسها بس لا تحبها اذا حبيتها (راح يجيك اقوى بوري منها)

17 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC123 viewsread 31 August 2026

قدمتَ عمرك للأحلامِ قربانا لا خُنتَ عهدًا ولا خادعت إنسان والان تحمل احلامًا مبعثرة هل هان حُلْمُك أم انتَ الذي هانا؟

14 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC144 views4 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Forwarded from @wezaryataa

FACT : كلهم حجولكم عن السادس والمواد بس محد حجالكم شلون راح يبدي النفاق وتبين الوجوه الحقيقية لاقرب ناس الكم وراح تعرف منو يحبك ومنو جان حاقد عليك .

👍3❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC198 views2 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

⚡1❤‍🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC298 views5 reactionsread 31 August 2026

هسه اكدر اكول صباح الخير 🦋

💋4❤‍🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC250 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

حسبي الله لا ليلنا ليل ولا نهارنا نهار

👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iuof276. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ثالث عيَوني
@TSS4X · 39,429
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“27” (@iuof276), 425 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iuof276.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.