Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓘tt͟i 𝒴𝘶𝘮 .

@ittiyum

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

120subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130747786
TypeChannel
Username@ittiyum
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ittiyum

Growth

1209 Aug 2026, 04:17 — 120 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:51 — 120 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 04:179 Aug 2026, 05:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 119–121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:51120no change
9 Aug 2026, 04:17120first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.8%
avg views ÷ 120 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.4
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held10 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total634
Reactions total103
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53010039212658231462423.3%
custom 53211747541351505461817.5%
custom 53008275870885197851716.5%
custom 53010728297211182491312.6%
custom 53819876212809726701312.6%
76.80%
custom 530354936799353589643.88%
❤‍🔥32.91%
👀21.94%
😎21.94%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ittiyum. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC39 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

meow . ฅ⁠^⁠•⁠ﻌ⁠•⁠^⁠ฅ

custom 53010039212658231467custom 53008275870885197852custom 53211747541351505462

7 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC61 views21 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

같은 하늘 아래 같은 꿈을 새겨 너와 내가 이어져 하나, 둘, 셋, 반짝!

custom 53010039212658231469custom 53010728297211182494custom 53035493679935358964custom 530082758708851978521custom 53819876212809726701

7 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 53211747541351505463custom 53008275870885197852custom 53010728297211182491custom 53819876212809726701

7 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC125 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

O naui keullematiseu... Simyeoneseo pin huimang O naui keullematiseu Hangsang gyeote isseo jwo (⁠´⁠⊙⁠ω⁠⊙⁠`⁠)⁠!

custom 53008275870885197858custom 53211747541351505464custom 53010728297211182493😎2custom 538198762128097267021

7 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC41 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sagnip_emaePhoto

ɸоᴛо ᴄо ʙчᴇᴩᴀɯнᴇᴦо дня 🌟

custom 53819876212809726704custom 53008275870885197852custom 53010728297211182492

7 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨с кем из твоих знакомых хочешь познакомиться поближе или больше общаться?⁩ честно, не знаю. Знаю, что, скорее всего, такие люди есть, просто сейчас я не могу о них вспомнить. В любом случае, мне кажется, прям так прямо я бы не сказала (( по мне это как то не очень красиво. Если есть желание общаться со мной ближе, я всегда только за, даже если я часто пропадаю и могу не отвечать. Это не всегд

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! ⁨топ 5 подруг из класса⁩ Саша З., Лина, Арина, Маша. Так же, очень хорошо отношусь к Саше В

4👀2

7 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC65 views13 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

кофточко Артемия (⁠っ⁠˘̩⁠╭⁠╮⁠˘̩⁠)⁠っ

custom 53211747541351505465custom 53010039212658231464custom 53819876212809726703custom 53008275870885197851

7 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC65 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📨 Получено сообщение! « ⁨Ты с колей встречаешься ещё?⁩ » да. 4 месяца отношений. Безумно счастлива, находясь в отношениях с ним (⁠ ⁠;⁠∀⁠;⁠)

custom 53010039212658231464custom 53010728297211182493custom 53819876212809726702custom 53211747541351505461

6 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC65 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3custom 53211747541351505463

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ittiyum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 84,903 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓘tt͟i 𝒴𝘶𝘮 .” (@ittiyum), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ittiyum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.