1 Sept 2025, 20:27 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026
這個水平 還能腆著臉一個logo收1000u 壬裁 👍 去買的人更是甜菜中的甜菜 😆
Channel
:D)
@itswowsstudio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001766926593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itswowsstudio |
| Description | 不做了，這個圈子不好玩，大師太多，已轉行，活得還算滋潤，謝謝。 |
| Created | 1 January 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itswowsstudio |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 1 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 6
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
1 Sept 2025, 20:24 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
主包幾年前隨便剛學3D做出來的圖的質感也不至於這麼狗屎 😅
1 Sept 2025, 20:23 UTC48 viewsread 12 August 2026
都不知道這人怎麼學的3D 估計就是會用軟件 = 會設計
1 Sept 2025, 20:22 UTC31 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunndesignPhoto
Photo, posted without a caption
22 Jan 2025, 13:34 UTC74 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sunndesign
急寻iOS开发大佬 敬请至讯 @SolarisEco 若遇双向, 请改用站内讯
22 Jan 2025, 13:34 UTC87 viewsread 12 August 2026
簡稱：接了個活 做不了 🤣
29 Dec 2024, 15:05 UTC133 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
😭👊 頻道主好菜 頻道主好菜 為什麼頻道主什麼都不會 他太強了 😭
29 Dec 2024, 14:33 UTC164 viewsread 12 August 2026
https://t.me/sunndesign/480 平等的尊重每一個 - 使用疑似 AI 生成的HTML Tenplate (HTML) 中仍保留大量注釋 - 在2024年 不使用任何Web框架並看不上所有主流框架，創新性地使用使用 JQuery，直接對DOM進行操作，極大提升了網頁性能 - 在2024年 仍堅守本心，抵制 TypeScript (*個人偏好)，並全部使用 JavsScript，在編譯到生產環境不去除腳本中的注釋 (*不清楚是否是編譯產物 🤣) - 佈局模糊，響應式設計失敗，很多glitch - 認為 大字體+ 顏色單一 就是設計感高級 - 設計案例就是 放幾張圖片 - 標點符號都加不清楚，在一個頁面中有的段落有句號有的沒有 🤣 - CSS逐句注釋，避免有人看不懂自己寫的是什麼 的前端開發與設計。 歡迎打開 Blog 並按下F12以開始欣賞前端水平。 頻道主覺得拿腳寫都比他寫得好 😭😭 能不能來找…
24 Aug 2023, 20:17 UTC206 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
插句嘴 我很難想象怎麼會有人把一張只有幾個圖形的PDF乾到300M的 🤣 你們可以理解嗎 可以理解的說一下原理 🫡 這很「包豪斯」。
24 Aug 2023, 17:06 UTC184 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
什麼是包豪斯設計風格呢？ 包豪斯的設計理念是形式追隨功能，少即是多，去除一些不必要的裝飾，也是包豪斯整個設計風格特點的精髓，包豪斯設計在保持功能性的同時體現了未來主義的外觀。包豪斯倡導功能為主，不花哨，簡單而優雅的幾何形狀，理性化和簡潔設計為主，它偏向於實用而不是炫耀。 当然，图形结构、设计风格简单，对于外行人来说，自然也是受「包豪斯设计」的影响。 直到有幸拿到了一份SVG文件。才发现—— 「包豪斯設計風格」背後，是隨心所欲、天馬行空的走線。 私想，若鄙人的設計能力達到此般水準，也可以開個頻道掙錢吧。 * 如果不夠明顯，「a」字符中間的圓心偏移、「n」字符中間缺口上側部份的右側偏移、「s」字符的整體偏移、「C」字符的整體偏移、「u」字符中間缺口下策部份的右側偏移等。
29 Jul 2023, 18:39 UTC133 viewsread 12 August 2026
明白了 不是什麼專業做哪個 是 哪個掙錢做哪個。
24 Jul 2023, 10:17 UTC136 viewsread 12 August 2026
《LOGO定制设计，VI设计，网页设计，etc.》 好专业 呜呜呜 🥹
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @itswowsstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,400,218 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“:D)” (@itswowsstudio), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itswowsstudio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.