Channel
@itsreallynot
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,875subscribers
+62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001235422123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itsreallynot |
| Description | Разоблачение фейков в крупнейших СМИ (проект издания The Insider - Theins.ru) |
| Created | 18 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itsreallynot |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @itsreallynot/1804 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 16:53 UTC | @theinsider/5304116 Oct 2026, 16:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @itsreallynot/1806 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC | @theinsider/5315921 Oct 2026, 16:04 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @itsreallynot/1810 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 16:58 UTC | @theinsider/5331126 Oct 2026, 16:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @theinsider | 42 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (42–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 64 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @itsreallynot — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
19,400 average views per post against 8,871 subscribers — an engagement rate of 218.5%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 368,200 |
| Mature posts only | 218.5% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,871 measured 3 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.915th percentile · 16.0× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.047% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:55 | 8,875 | -9 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:09 | 8,884 | +13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:00 | 8,871 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:51 | 8,877 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 20:48 | 8,879 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 8,877 | +8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 8,869 | +2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 8,867 | -3 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 8,870 | -10 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 8,880 | +21 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 8,859 | -1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 8,860 | +20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 8,840 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 8,847 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 8,850 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 8,854 | +23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 8,831 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 8,828 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 8,831 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 8,833 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (6 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 279,600 |
| Reactions total | 704 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3,037 reactions across 62 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 2,069 | 68.1% | |
| 😁 | 481 | 15.8% | |
| 👍 | 280 | 9.22% | |
| 🤬 | 122 | 4.02% | |
| 🥴 | 57 | 1.88% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 0.494% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 0.296% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.132% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚑 Фейк Первого канала: в Канаде ветеранам вместо медицинской помощи предлагают эвтаназию Первый канал в дневном выпуске новостей рассказывает: «Скандал разгорается в Канаде. Там готовят коллективный иск против правительства. Нескольким бывшим военным вместо лечения предложили эвтаназию. (...) Получить последний укол в Канаде проще, чем добиться лечения при многих болезнях, в том числе вполне излечимых. И сами врачи…
🤡40😁6👍1
Фейк «Вестей»: в ЕС создали коррупционную схему, эксплуатирующую проблемы украинцев с документами «Вести» на фоне российских заявлений о неприемлемости участия представителей ЕС в переговорах о российско-украинской войне сообщают: «В Европе наладили коррупционную схему на беженцах с Украины, имеющих проблемы с документами. Об этом ИС „Вести“ заявил политолог Спиридон Килинкаров. Желание «Вестей» обвинить европейце…
🤡25👍2
🫡 Фейк кремлевских СМИ: арестованная в Украине за организацию провокации Валентина Молода входила в список 100 лучших врачей страны Программа «Время» на Первом канале рассказывает об арестованной в Украине Валентине Молодой, которая под видом врача скорой помощи пыталась проникнуть в дом в Петропавловской Борщаговке под Киевом, где якобы находился «пыточный подвал»: «Она врач. Пыталась помочь искалеченным узникам, …
🤡35😁11👍7
Запад начинает сворачивать свой «антироссийский проект», то есть поддержку Украины, заявила на брифинге Мария Захарова В действительности значительного сокращения помощи не видно. В прошлом году помогать прекратила администрация Трампа, но ЕС и другие страны Запада во многом это компенсировали. Интересно, что Захарова выступила в тот самый день, когда ЕС выделил Украине новый пакет помощи на €4,36 млрд. Читать в Р…
🤡48😁10👍2
🫡️️️️️️ Отставной капитан армии США рассказал в «Вестях», как Трамп может остаться на третий срок. Сценарий абсолютно невероятный Дональд Трамп может пойти на третий президентский срок, используя Акт о национальной чрезвычайной ситуации, сообщили «Вести» со ссылкой на бывшего офицера армии США, политического аналитика Станислава Крапивника. В действительности Акт о национальной чрезвычайной ситуации для продления п…
🤡33👍8
📉 Фейк РИА «Новости»: в результате сделки Трампа и Путина дизельное топливо в США уже дешевеет После соглашения Москвы и Вашингтона в США стало дешеветь дизельное топливо, сообщили РИА «Новости». В последние двое суток розничные цены на дизельное топливо действительно снижаются. Правда, значительным это снижение не назовешь, а если рассматривать динамику цен за полгода, совершенно не заметно, как повлияла на них сд…
🤡34🥴5👍4
🤥️️️️️️ Фейк Владимира Путина: Россия — одна из трех стран мира, обладающих полным суверенитетом в цифровой сфере В мире только Россия, США и Китай обладают полным суверенитетом в информационной и цифровой сферах, заявил Путин на полях саммита Россия—Африка. Под цифровым суверенитетом, по-видимому, надо понимать способность самостоятельно поддерживать всю критически важную цифровую экосистему, не рискуя потерять до…
🤡38😁12👍3🥴2
Путин рассказал, что ЕС, отказываясь от российского газа, бьет по своей экономике. Экономика удара не почувствовала «...Любые попытки исключить Россию из числа участников мирового газового рынка, сдержать развитие этой отрасли в нашей стране имеют серьезные последствия, прежде всего растущие, запредельные издержки для иностранных конечных потребителей газа. Именно это мы видим сейчас в Европе, которая сама наносит у…
🤡28😁11👍2🥴1
«Вести» рассказали, что жители сельской части Иллинойса выступают за выход из его состава. Слухи сильно преувеличены Часть жителей Иллинойса планирует создать новый 51-й штат США путем отделения округов за пределами Чикаго, заявили «Вести» со ссылкой на NBC Chicago. Отделение части округов от Иллинойса должны будут одобрить как Генассамблея Иллинойса, так и Конгресс США. У этой инициативы вряд ли есть сколько-нибуд…
🤡22👍3😁3
Фейк повторного использования: Зеленский плюнул под ноги королю Швеции, когда тот отказался пожать ему руку RT и многочисленные Z-каналы рассказывают и даже показывают видео: король Швеции Карл XVI Густав якобы отказался пожимать руку Зеленскому, а тот плюнул ему под ноги. Фейк интересен тем, что полгода назад его уже использовали, вот только про плевок тогда еще не придумали. Король встречался с Зеленским во Львов…
🤡45😁19
🫡️️️️️️ Первый канал сообщил об отмене польской военной помощи Украине, когда эти слухи уже были официально опровергнуты Варшава отменила передачу военной помощи Киеву, заявили на Первом канале. За день до публикации Первого канала замминистра обороны Польши Цезары Томчик категорически опроверг слухи о приостановке военной помощи и подчеркнул: «Польша, как и прежде, продолжает — и будет продолжать — оказывать помо…
🤡29😁7🥴3👍1
🫣️️️️️️ «Если бы российские танки не свернули с шоссе в грязь, Киев был бы взят за четыре часа». Альтернативная история войны от Дональда Трампа Провальное решение российского генералитета было, только заключалось оно вовсе не в том, чтобы наступать по полям, а не по шоссе. Растянувшаяся на 64 км колонна бронетехники встала именно на шоссе: снабжать такую длинную колонну топливом было крайне сложно, а удары по голов…
🤡48👍14😁3🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @itsreallynot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На самом деле нет” (@itsreallynot), 8,875 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsreallynot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.