Channel
@itlvault
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004417270068 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itlvault |
| Description | ITL Vault | A collateral-based Web3 vault for the InterLink ecosystem. Exploring asset utility, liquidity access, and transparent on-chain innovation Official Page https://x.com/ITLvault |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 13 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itlvault |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 79 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 79 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,077 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
43 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 48.8% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 25.6% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 23.3% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Utility, practicality, safety, and transparency are always among ITL Vault’s highest priorities. We are not simply building a DApp that allows users to use ITL as collateral to access liquidity. Our goal is to create a tool that is genuinely useful, easy to understand, and applicable to real-life needs. Every mechanism related to LTV, loan fees, risk warnings, and liquidation should be clearly disclosed so users ca…
Go wherever you want, 🍜 eat whatever you love, and ✨ enjoy life in your own way. We only live once. 💜 But first… make sure you accumulate plenty of ITL! 😄🚀💰 @itlvault
👍1
Recently, we received the following question: “If I lock ITL for five years in ITL Vault, can I borrow USDT immediately? What is the maximum LTV, the interest rate, and the penalty for early unstaking? What happens if the ITL price drops and the LTV increases?” First, it is important to clarify that ITL Vault does not require users to stake ITL for five years in order to borrow USDT. ITL Vault operates through a c…
❤2
🌙 GOOD EVENING, ITL VAULT COMMUNITY! Let’s have a quick discussion tonight: Suppose the ITL price rises and your loan’s LTV drops from 30% to 20%, giving you additional borrowing capacity. What would you choose? A. Borrow more to use the additional liquidity B. Keep the LTV low to maintain a safer position C. Repay part of the loan to make the position even healthier D. It depends on the purpose of the loan Shar…
👍2
📈 IF THE ITL PRICE INCREASES AFTER A LOAN IS CREATED, CAN YOU BORROW MORE? Suppose you have already deposited ITL as collateral and opened a loan on ITL Vault with an initial LTV of 30%. Later, the ITL price increases. When the value of your collateral rises while your outstanding debt remains unchanged, your loan’s LTV will decrease. This means your position becomes safer, and additional borrowing capacity may be…
🔥1
📢 HOW WILL ITL VAULT VALUE COLLATERAL IF ITL REACHES 30 USDT? In many of our recent posts explaining ITL Vault, we have used an OTC reference price of 2 USDT per ITL. This may have led some users to believe that opening a meaningful loan through the DApp will always require a very large amount of ITL as collateral. However, it is important to understand that ITL Vault will value collateral based on the actual valu…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
📊 IS A 30% LTV BORROWING LIMIT TOO LOW? Some people believe that a maximum borrowing limit of 30% LTV does not fully utilize the value of ITL. However, the goal of ITL Vault is not to help users borrow as much as possible. It is to provide safe liquidity for urgent financial needs without requiring users to sell their ITL. For example, suppose a user owns 500 ITL and the reference price is 2 USDT per ITL. The tota…
🔥2
ITL Vault’s goal is not simply to provide large loans, but to build a practical and sustainable liquidity system for ITL holders. ITL Vault allows users to access USDT without selling their assets. This liquidity can support a wide range of needs, from everyday spending and shopping to small business activities and urgent financial expenses. Users can deposit ITL as collateral, access an amount of liquidity that ma…
❤4🔥1
When assessing an asset, we will rely on its current real-world value, rather than expectations about how much it may increase in the future. Therefore, during the initial stage, using the OTC price as the reference value is both appropriate and practical. For example, when you use a piece of land as collateral for a bank loan, the bank determines your borrowing limit based on the land’s current appraised value—not …
❤2🔥2
Users can monitor both LTV and the ITL price directly within the DApp. This makes it easier to understand the status of your loan, track the health of your collateral, and manage risk more proactively. When the ITL price changes, you can quickly see how it affects your LTV and decide whether to add more collateral or repay part of the loan when necessary. We believe a good DApp should not only have clear mechanism…
🔥1
🎉Congratulations to everyone who has won a prize in the ITL Vault Giveaway! Check the list below now to see whether you are one of the lucky winners. 🏆 https://x.com/i/status/2081947594264363277
👍2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @itlvault. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 780,244 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ITL VAULT” (@itlvault), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itlvault.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.