Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Экзистенциальное раздражение

@it_sounds_silly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001532190424
TypeChannel
Username@it_sounds_silly
DescriptionYou can call me Tokyo cuz my head is overcrowded. 18+
Created6 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/it_sounds_silly

Growth

2037 Aug 2026, 10:25 — 203 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:19 — 203 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:258 Aug 2026, 11:19
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:19203no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:25203first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 14 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.7%
avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
1 post measured
Reaction rate
22.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (14 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
510
Videos
165
Links
187

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52244836199841281704327.6%
💅3925.0%
custom 54516845466741737963421.8%
custom 53187833592943824993019.2%
custom 5433635625217563352106.41%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC103 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

зову всех, у кого есть гиперфиксы на мальчиков/мужчин/дедов 🤩 настроение объективизировать мужчин и сделать шахматы на раздевание с 2д-кунами в формате новеллы, так что мне срочно нужны рефы ваших крашей ♡ принимаются фоточки живых (и почивших) мужчин, скриншотики из манг/манхв и аниме, любимые тропы, хештеги с ао3, хоть картинки с пинтереста главное что вы 🎀 ЧЕТА ЧУВСТВУЕТЕ 🎀

custom 531878335929438249913custom 52244836199841281706💅4

15 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC170 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

планы на вечер: заставить нейронку мычать. к сожалению, новую модельку голоса chatgpt мне раскатали только сейчас, а потому по следам быстрого теста — они все еще не научились петь в целом про генерацию вокала мы с вами уже шушукались, да и обсуждать суно в топе чартов мне не кайф; тут важно зафиксировать то, что в потоковом аудио пока никаких колыбельных нам с вами не светит. а что есть? ну, с трудом называемое ме

💅5custom 52244836199841281704custom 54516845466741737963

4 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC200 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ещё есть подкаст из серии войсов про сексуализацию мужчин, который я записывала подружкам, но такое только в личку скидываю, так что если цифры знаете — набирайте 🤩

custom 54516845466741737964

4 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC202 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

пока я стоически формулирую какие-то там мысли, держите фанфакт про аниме о котором вы, как и я, вероятно никогда не думали все вот эти вот расширения территории и другие техники выкрикивают как минимум по двум причинам: • техническая — ну а как ещё в манге понятно рисовать вы мне объясните • так делают в карате, у них там вообще по ходу вечно нужно обнаруживать свое существование второе, соответственно, первопричи

custom 53187833592943824994custom 52244836199841281702custom 54516845466741737962

10 May 2026, 17:50 UTC280 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

привет, на связи внезапное подключение с рубрикой легендарного маркетинга, за который я ручки целовать готова 📎 речь сегодня пойдет о Виталии Терлецком — авторе комиксов «Собакистан», «Причудливые авантюры Жожо», вселенной «Альтушка для скуфа» и участнике последней битвы экстрасенсов + еще пачка регалий включая свое издательство, но там вы уже сами погуглите 🤩 вводные у нас такие: в конце февраля стартовал новый се

custom 522448361998412817012💅10custom 54516845466741737969

10 May 2026, 17:45 UTC214 viewsread 8 August 2026

дисклеймер к посту ниже 🤩 мы конечно можем порассуждать об этическом противоречии вовлечения людей в контент о колдунах и ведьмах и тд и тп, но давайте оч кратко: • во время социальных сложностей люди сами идут искать магическое так что мерлин им судья • все лавры по привлечению аудитории у самой команды битвы • в контексте всего что будет сказано ниже — это работа с уже существующей аудиторией, а не с новой, камон

1 May 2026, 19:05 UTC296 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сегодня говорим словами мертвецов есть такой термин — хонтология. создан Деррида в рамках его исследований марксизма, чтобы пояснять за призраков коммунизма позже его переосмыслил Марк Фишер — он писал, что призраки приходят из прошлого и появляются в настоящем; они не принадлежат прошлому, но и не принадлежат настоящему и в том их темпоральный парадокс; мир кишит призраками. он приладил этот термин к культурному,

custom 54336356252175633527custom 52244836199841281705custom 54516845466741737964

23 Apr 2026, 11:05 UTC224 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

коллеги по миру ллмок, есть наблюдение и мне нужен ваш опыт: стала замечать, что если год-два назад разные модели llm выдавали разные текстовые клише, то сейчас они плюс-минус одинаковые вне зависимости от разработчика че думаем, это потому что, как и предполагали, ии стали учиться друг об друга так как в интернете критически выросло количество сгенеренных текстов или есть ещё гипотезы?

custom 52244836199841281704

20 Apr 2026, 09:14 UTC240 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @td20corePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 531878335929438249910custom 52244836199841281704custom 54516845466741737963

13 Apr 2026, 18:59 UTC345 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

план на вечер такой: уважаем женщин 🎀 как и вероятно многие из вас я недавно наткнулась на видосы, где так или иначе показывают/обсуждают кибердеки, сделанные (чаще всего) на базе raspberry pi. и это зачастую — абсолютно девичьи кибердеки, очень эстетичные и классные. тем не менее, не мини-компами едиными: хорошо покопавшись, мне удалось найти и другие вещи, созданные руками девчонок, и их основное отличие в том что

💅9custom 52244836199841281706

13 Apr 2026, 18:49 UTC190 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

я не предлагаю угадывать где чей кибердек, но можете просто посмотреть щя текстик оформлю 🤩

💅5

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @it_sounds_silly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,033,723 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Экзистенциальное раздражение” (@it_sounds_silly), 203 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_sounds_silly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.