Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Д - это не просто буква

Channel

Д - это не просто буква

@it_not_just_a_letter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002389486159
TypeChannel
Username@it_not_just_a_letter
DescriptionАналитика прошедших и предстоящих матчей ФК Динамо Москва. Новости. Общение. И немножечко хоккея. Для связи - @Alex_Izg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/it_not_just_a_letter

Growth

1317 Aug 2026, 17:10 — 131 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:01 — 131 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:109 Aug 2026, 01:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:01131no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:10131first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.6%
avg views ÷ 131 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.2
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (7 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,186
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
66
Videos
25
Links
51

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1340.6%
👍721.9%
😁515.6%
412.5%
💯26.25%
🥰13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC53 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Всех, кто как и я, не смотрел этот ужас, с победой!...

😁3

2 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC91 viewsread 9 August 2026

Вот ни разу с 11 мыслями Димы не соглашусь. Артур лучший? Возможно. Но мозга у него нет. В первом выходе убери под себя и расстреливай пустые. Во втором выходе - убери под себя. Но там подстраховка близко была. Костя бледный, потому что нет обостряющих передач в финальную треть. Всё треугольники катаем возле чужой штрафной. Открываться впереди за спины кроме Кости некому. Поэтому имеем что имеем

1 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC110 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Касания в матче. Защитники и вратарь - 462 Все остальные - 336 Есть о чем задуматься видимо

1 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC92 viewsread 9 August 2026

Даже и говорить ничего не хочется. Клоунская игра Калининграда принесла им результат. Шнапцев навалялся на газоне на 10 туров вперёд Вроде и игра хорошая. И скорости хорошие. Много игры на третьего, но очень мало мячей доходит до Кости. Мало обостряющих передач. Почти всё спиной к воротам или навесы. Вместо 9 очков в первых трёх турах с командами автобусами, неизвестно сколько наберём теперь. Следующая игра с лидер

1 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Шикарные кадры вар показал судье. 38 раз прокрутили удар Касереса по ноге и ни разу не показали игру рукой в приёме и отмашку от Касереса Позорный чемпионат...

💯2

1 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC83 viewsread 9 August 2026

Мокрый газон. Скользкий мяч. Ноль дальних ударов. Всё жëпой закатить хотим в касание Балтика почти без моментов - это очень пугает перед вторым таймом

1 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Шварц неделю назад - в Калининграде будет кардинально другой состав. Шварц сегодня - Расулов вместо травмированного Лунëва

😁1

1 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC82 viewsread 9 August 2026

Конкурс Динамовцев. Второй тур Балтика - Динамо 20:45 По результатам первого тура @chort_o4ka - 0 очков @Alex_Izg - 0 очков Правила просты. Перед туром будет выходить пост, в комментариях к которому нужно будет оставлять свои прогнозы. Прогнозируем только матчи нашего любимого и Великого Динамо Суть конкурса: 1. Прогнозируем точный счет матча Угадан счет +5 очков Угадана разница +3 очка Угадан исход +1 очко 2.

25 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC119 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ужаснейшая игра во втором тайме. Невезение в первом. Мастерство Лунëва. Как итог - закономерная ничья с удобнейшим соперником, которого Сандро ещё ни разу не обыграл. От своих вчерашних мыслей не отказываюсь. Гладышев ужасен, Фомин не впечатляет. Осипенко медленный, но сегодня повезло. Нужно менять состав...

25 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC119 viewsread 9 August 2026

Внимание, конкурс! Я долго думал, какой организовать конкурс, чтобы не дублировать никого из известных ведущих и блогеров, и кажется, получилось. Правила просты. Перед туром будет выходить пост, в комментариях к которому нужно будет оставлять свои прогнозы. Прогнозируем только матчи нашего любимого и Великого Динамо Суть конкурса: 1. Прогнозируем точный счет матча Угадан счет +5 очков Угадана разница +3 очка Уга

24 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC96 viewsread 9 August 2026

Балтику жалко. Игра ничейная была, но да ладно. Перед выездом в Калининград в следующем туре, как обычно, тревожно. А теперь про мысли о сезоне. 1. Чемпионство мы вряд-ли увидим, хоть и все верим. С текущим составом предел мечтаний - место в тройке 2. Основной состав. - Вратарская позиция у нас слабая. Основной Лунëв. Будем верить в его сейвы и отсутствие привозов - Защитники. Правый фланг однозначно Касерес

24 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Поздравляю всех со стартом нового сезона! Чуть позже, до завтрашней встречи, мысли о сезоне, о Косте и небольшой интерактив

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @it_not_just_a_letter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Д - это не просто буква” (@it_not_just_a_letter), 131 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_not_just_a_letter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.