Channel
@it_is_okay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
280subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266414747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @it_is_okay |
| Created | 3 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/it_is_okay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 280 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 281 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 281 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (18 October 2024 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 75 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
199 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 159 | 79.9% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 10.6% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 7.04% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.01% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.503% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Делюсь с вами прекрасной работой "Нейрокогнитивная архитектура биполярного расстройства" - звучит сложно, но текст очень внятный, может быть интересен как коллегам, так и людям с БАР и их близким. Наслаждайтесь) https://t.me/metacognition_discussion/248
👍6
Signed Наталья Сафонова
its okay pinned a photo
Оказалось, живу тут без поста-знакомства) Привет! Я Наташа Сафонова. Этот канал - место, где я не блогер, но немного графоманка) Пишу о том, что саму цепляет, о чём дышу и размышляю. Если вы здесь, похоже, мы в чём-то совпадаем) Немного обо мне: • психолог, практикую более 10 лет; • аккредитованный гештальт-терапевт; • аккредитованный супервизор МИГИП. Часы терапии и супервизии со мной засчитываются студентам для с…
❤16❤🔥1🔥1
Signed Наталья Сафонова
Кто меня знает, тот уже привык к моим метафорам разной степени упоротости и охоте за удачными формулировками. На этом и живёт моё guilty pleasure - слабость к высказываниям великих, точно подмечающим феномены нашей жизни. Если не иронизировать над собой, я просто вижу в этом опору: проще жить, когда за спиной стоит кто-то мудрый - неважно, Александр Сергеевич, Екатерина Михайловна или Джейсон Стэтхем. Поэтому я прин…
🔥13❤6
Привет. Спасибо, что не отписываетесь, однажды я может ещё стану настоящим взрослым блогером (признаем - нет), и буду постить с какой-то там регулярностью. Но сегодня я здесь, чтобы напомнить: Если у вас ещё нет известной специальной программы для выхода во внешний интернет, то правда есть смысл её купить. У меня лично их три - ни о чём не жалею. Если вас такая покупка бьет по кошельку, покупку можно пошерить с друз…
❤21
можно праздновать, а можно не праздновать можно поздравлять, а можно не поздравлять можно веселиться, а можно не веселиться можно грустить или вообще игнорировать существование нового года я проводила новогоднюю ночь очень по-разному - дома и вне его, в Москве и в другой стране, в кругу самых близких и среди незнакомцев, радостно и уныло, несколько раз одна - и когда-то это было страшно тоскливо, а когда-то очень пр…
❤33🔥2
Почему?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Спасибо всем за ваши голоса, очень интересные результаты! Выходит, большинство людей либо в принципе забивают за упражнения, либо делают выборочно. Интересно, почему)
Опрос анонимный. Когда в книгах по популярной психологии дают задания, я:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Рутина терапевтической работы - это формирование навыков. А иногда в этом будет заключаться вся терапия. Распознавать свои чувства - тоже просто навык. Вы раз за разом как можно чаще "вручную" обращаетесь к своему телу, описываете состояние, подбираете подходящие слова для описания чувств. Иногда нужно просто развить словарь, научиться определять оттенки чувств. Но это проза. Мне вот что интересно. В книгах по популя…
❤2
Что такое теория парадоксальных изменений (ТПИ) и как она нам пригождается. ПТИ Арнольда Бейссера утверждает, что изменения происходят в точке, где я принимаю себя или свою особенность, а не сражаюсь с ней. В этом её парадоксальность, да) Клиенты приходят в терапию, что-то поменять, а мы предлагаем им обратное. Как это работает? Пример. Я, как и многие люди с СДВГ, с самого детства имею большие проблемы со сном. Тр…
❤17🔥4
Привет! Ниже анонс - для моих коллег и супервизантов, которые подыскивают себе пространство для профессионального развития. Сейчас есть 3 места Набор закрыт. Запись в лист ожидания. Камерная супервизорская группа «Тонкая настройка» Для практикующих терапевтов Очно, Москва Привет, я Наташа Сафонова — гештальт-терапевт, аккредитованный супервизор МИГИП. Я люблю долгосрочную терапию и ценю долгосрочную супервизию. Лю…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @it_is_okay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Почему?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Опрос анонимный. Когда в книгах по популярной психологии дают задания, я:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2024 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“its okay” (@it_is_okay), 280 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_is_okay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.