Собрал играбельный прототип онлайн-стратегии за 2 недели. С ИИ. Карта генерируется, замки строятся, герои ведут армии, бои идут на гексах. Бэкенд на Rust, клиент на TypeScript/Pixi.js, лендинг на Next.js. Проект называется Ashes of Dominion — онлайн-стратегия в духе Heroes of Might & Magic. Живой мир, PvP, контроль территории, никакого pay2win. Браузер, один аккаунт — телефон, ПК, планшет. Прототип работает, разра…

Channel
IT без вёсел ☕️
@it_bez_vesel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003581149095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @it_bez_vesel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 3 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/it_bez_vesel |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 184 | +1 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 183 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 184 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 184 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 57.1% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2026 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 9
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @it_bez_vesel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 January 2026 to 27 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Тестирование на проде — это не стратегия, это диагноз Знаете этот подход? «Ну я задеплою, а там посмотрим». Посмотрим что? Как юзеры находят баги быстрее любого QA-отдела? Классика жанра: → «У меня локально работает» → Деплой в пятницу в 18:00 → Суббота, 2 ночи, телефон горит → Хотфикс. Хотфикс на хотфикс. Откат. Написать тесты — час. Починить прод ночью — восемь. Но тесты же «некогда писать», да.
Я всегда хотел в геймдев. Ну как «хотел» — периодически открывал Unity, проходил первый туториал, делал кубик который прыгает, и забивал на полгода. Стандартная история. Сейчас наконец руки дошли по-настоящему — делаю игру на PixiJS. И знаете что оказалось самым неожиданным? Не движок, не шейдеры, не пиксель-арт. А то, что алгоритмы, которые все зубрят для собесов — тут реально нужны. Я их никогда не зубрил. Потому…
Обратный снобизм Раньше в IT хвастались стеком. Rust, Haskell, Kubernetes на bare metal — чем сложнее, тем больше уважения в чатике. Теперь появилась новая валюта понтов: «Я не использую AI». Заходишь в комментарии на Хабре — сеньоры с 15-летним опытом гордо пишут, что им AI не нужен. Мол, мозг есть, руки есть, зачем мне этот костыль. И получают одобрительные кивки от таких же. Выглядит как принципиальная позиция…
Мы с партнёрами запустились как техническая команда, берём проекты на разработку Что умеем: — полный цикл: от интерфейса до серверной части и инфраструктуры — высоконагруженный бэкенд (Java, Go, Kotlin, Rust) — фронтенд (React, Vue, Next.js) — телеграм-боты, mini apps, платёжные интеграции — AI/LLM — встраиваем нейросети в бизнес-процессы — парсинг, сбор данных, мониторинг — DevOps: Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD — ауди…
Как IT-компании ищут сотрудников (и почему это цирк) Представьте: вы 15 лет работали шеф-поваром. Кормили министров, тушили пожары на кухне, управляли командой. Приходите устраиваться в ресторан, а вас просят: — Нарежьте морковку на время — Расскажите, чем отличается соль от сахара — А теперь решите уравнение теплопроводности для духовки Добро пожаловать на IT-собеседование. 🎪 Зоопарк абсурда LeetCode-секта. Зад…
Photo, posted without a caption
https://habr.com/ru/articles/988004/
🤖 LLM на страже HR: боты нанимают ботов Одна финтех-контора похвасталась на Хабре — прикрутили нейросетку к скринингу резюме и "сократили ручной труд HR на 70%". Gemma-3 теперь решает, достоин ли ты, жалкий человечек, права на собеседование. Оценка от 1 до 10, как в школе, только без возможности пересдать. Комментаторы мгновенно уловили суть: на той стороне уже сидит такая же LLM, генерящая резюме на 146% релевантн…
🧪 210 тестов за 2 часа: как ИИ пишет тесты Сегодня покрыл тестами целый модуль — от базы данных до UI. Делюсь цифрами. Результат: • 136 backend тестов (Kotlin) • 54 frontend unit теста (React) • 20 E2E тестов (браузер) • Всё проходит за 9 секунд Сколько времени это заняло: С ИИ — около 2 часов. Причём большая часть времени ушла на обсуждение архитектуры и ревью, а не на написание кода. Руками я бы потратил 2-3 …
Говорят, что трудные времена рождают сильных людей. Я же думаю, они просто срывают маски и показывают, кто есть кто. В нашем цеху сейчас штормит. Многие замерли в ожидании: когда станет легче? Когда снова подует попутный ветер? Но философия нашего дела учит иному: само по себе ничего не чинится. Система не оживет, пока ты не приложишь руки и разум. Есть особый тип людей — те, в ком жажда созидания сильнее страха. Д…
Внезапно возглавил рейтинг авторов Хабра. Взять высоту проще, чем удержать, так что расслабляться рано. Скоро будут новые статьи.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @it_bez_vesel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IT без вёсел ☕️” (@it_bez_vesel), 184 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_bez_vesel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.