Записывайтесь! Андрей Герасимов долгие годы занимается этой темой, будет очень интересно!
🤩9✍2

Channel
@iss_sociology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
344subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003199960111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iss_sociology |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iss_sociology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 344 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 343 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 343 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
202 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 84 | 41.6% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 19.3% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5474318088021225062 | 20 | 9.90% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 6.44% | |
| 🤓 | 8 | 3.96% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.98% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.495% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iss_sociology. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 March 2026 to 19 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Записывайтесь! Андрей Герасимов долгие годы занимается этой темой, будет очень интересно!
🤩9✍2
Набор на курс о социологии знания «Лабиринты рефлексивности» открыт! Желающие забронировать платное место могут писать @theghostagainstthemachine, представившись и рассказав пару слов о себе в качестве знакомства. Участникам конкурса на бюджетные места необходимо кидать свои письма на гугл-форму до 24 июня. Жду вас!
❤🔥10❤2🔥1😁1
❤️ У наших друзей совсем скоро будет мероприятие, приходите!
🤓5❤4🤩1
ПолитRead | Уолтер Липпман «Общественное мнение» ПП × со\\мнение «Общественное мнение» Уолтера Липпмана — книга, впервые вышедшая в 1922 году и до сих пор неожиданно точно попадающая в разговор о современной политике и медиа. Это один из тех текстов, к которым постоянно возвращаются, когда пытаются понять, как именно формируются наши представления о мире. В рамках дискуссии мы сосредоточимся на обсуждении главы «Ка…
❤🔥6🔥3👍2❤1🤓1
Я считаю, что можно думать с Марксом вопреки Марксу или с Дюркгеймом вопреки Дюркгейму и ещё, конечно же, с Марксом и Дюркгеймом вопреки Веберу, и наоборот. И именно так двигается наука Пьер Бурдьё, Начала ❤ Спасибо всем, кто присутствовал на встрече! В скором времени мы опубликуем запись. 😵💫 По следам прошедшего выступления выкладываем текст, который упоминал Степан. Если у вас остались или появились новые вопросы…
❤🔥10🔥4❤2🥰1😍1
❤️ Коллеги, а вот и ссылка на встречу со Степаном Козловым! Ждём всех сегодня в 19:00! ссылка истекла
❤🔥4🔥2🙏2
Приглашаем на онлайн-встречу со Степаном Козловым «Вечное — это хорошо забытое новое? На полях неоконченной теории изобретений Пьера Бурдье»! Сопровождающее чтение: Козлов С. Бурдье и его изобретения Бурдье П. О государстве: Курс лекций в Коллеж де Франс (1989-1992). / Лекция 25 января 1990 года. Аннотация: Рефлексивная социология Бурдье - одновременно одно из общих мест социальной теории и при этом пространство пр…
❤17🔥5❤🔥2🤓2👍1
Наши друзья из вышки создали свой самиздат! ❤ Коллеги из проекта Сноска готовят первый выпуск студенческого журнала, в который вы можете отправить свои заметки или эссе, которыми давно хотели поделиться с миром! Проект открыт для студентов всех вузов. 💙 Подробности и требования к публикации текстов можно найти по ссылке. Готовы принять не только серьёзные вещи, но и более короткие шалости. 🐌 Дедлайн подачи текстов…
❤🔥13❤3🔥2✍1
Лекция о Монике Краузе с таймкодами уже есть в открытом доступе. В свете ее теории модельных кейсов обсудил с аудиторией не только советских востоковедов, но и спекулятивных реалистов. Как любит повторять Вадим Лукомский: цена за просмотр видео – лайк или комментарий для продвижения канала на YouTube! https://youtu.be/9g8W_kvjFs4?si=z5-r7z4Im0gAqFUj
❤🔥10custom 54743180880212250623🙏1
⚙️Напоминаем, что сегодня состоится лекция Андрея Герасимова «Моника Краузе: объекты тоже люди» В 20:00 всех ждем по этой ссылке, не пропустите! Ссылка истекла
❤🔥7🔥2custom 54743180880212250622❤1
Приглашаем на онлайн-встречу с Андреем Герасимовым «Моника Краузе: объекты тоже люди»! Продолжаем разговор о социологии знания. На этот раз в центре внимания — Моника Краузе и ее идея о том, что объекты в социальных науках обладают собственной агентностью. Звучит странно? Обычно неравенство в производстве знания обсуждают через доминирование стран или авторов. Краузе предлагает смотреть на сами объекты исследования.…
❤🔥17❤9custom 54743180880212250624🔥2
Теоретический семинар «Тезисы по повседневности»: встреча первая Коллеги, факультет политических исследований открывает серию семинаров, посвящённых обсуждению актуальных идей социального и гуманитарного знания. Ключевой вопрос семинара: как устроена наша повседневность? Повседневность, которая просачивается сквозь пальцы, но мимо которой у нас нет шансов просочиться, станет предметом обсуждения и анализа. Фиксиро…
custom 547431808802122506210🤩3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @iss_sociology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 483,782 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Социологи РАНХиГС | ФСФ ИОН” (@iss_sociology), 344 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iss_sociology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.