Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Islom va olim 📔

@islomvaolim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001654903015
TypeChannel
Username@islomvaolim
DescriptionOlimlardan bo'ling yoki ilm ahliga muhabbatli bo'ling! @islomolimlari_ask_bot
Created19 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/islomvaolim

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:1713no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5213first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 March 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
98
Videos
34
Links
70

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48m 12s
Average length
16m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1157.9%
421.1%
🔥210.5%
😢210.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2022 to 6 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Dec 2022, 13:32 UTC206 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hadlarni bilgan doim hurmatda bo'ladi! Ahmad Fotih Had - chegara @islomvaolim

🔥2

29 Apr 2022, 12:15 UTC367 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ulamolar_yogdusi

​​БИРИНЧИ БОБ: ИЛМНИНГ ОДОБЛАРИ ВА ФАЗИЛАТИ 14. «Билмайман» илмнинг ярмидир! Маъноси: Олим кишининг билмайман, деб айтиши унга зарар ҳам бермайди ва баъзи нодонлар ҳисоблаганидек, унинг қадрини ҳам туширмайди. «Билмайман» дейишга имкон топган кишига баъзи нарсаларни билмаслигининг зарари йўқ. Балки, унинг бу сўзи динининг қувватини, қалбининг поклигини, илмининг кўплигини ва ниятининг гўзаллигини ишорасидир! 📖 Шай

👍3

26 Apr 2022, 10:07 UTC285 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @oliymahad

#Ибрат Туркиялик Ислом олими Меҳмет Фотиҳ Читлак хўжа Умра зиёрати вақтида Уҳуд тоғига узоқ боқиб, ёнидаги талабаларидан сўрайди: - Уҳуд ғазотида камончилар тепалигини (ўлжа тўплаш учун) тарк этган саҳобалар кимлар эди? Ҳамма жим. Жавоб йўқ. Устоз саволини такрорлайди: - Камончилар тепалигини тарк этган саҳобалар кимлар эди? Талабаларнинг хижолатдан бошлари эгик. - Билмаймиз, устоз... – дейишади секингина. - Ишонинг

👍2

24 Apr 2022, 19:24 UTC245 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Islomiy ruhiyatni ayni zamon olimlaridan olib, salaf ulamolariga murojaat qilmaslik musulmon kishining faqatgina sabablarga bog'lanib qolishiga zamin yaratadi.

👍1

22 Apr 2022, 06:15 UTC208 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Долзарб савол-жавоблар Абдуғофур домла НИЁЗҚУЛОВ Ўзбекистон мусулмонлари идораси Фатво маркази бош мутахассиси

22 Apr 2022, 04:18 UTC183 viewsread 12 August 2026

Амал ўрни. Учинчи марта нафл ҳаж (биринчи фарз ҳаж адо этилгандан кейинги ҳажлар фарз эмас) қилишни мақсад қилиб, фарзи кифояга бефарқ бўлган кишидан: “Ҳаж қилишингиз учун қанча маблағ кетади? Минг жунайҳ кетадими?” деб сўрадим. У киши: “Ҳа, ундан ҳам кўпроқ кетиши мумкин”, деб жавоб берди. Мен унга: “Сизни бундан ҳам афзалроқ ишга далолат қилайми? Фалончи яқинда доришунослик (фармацевтика) билим юртини тамомлади.

12 Apr 2022, 17:26 UTC222 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ular xohlaganidek va o'ylaganidek Islom asliyatidan bexabar "zamonaviy musulmon" bo'lib qolishdan hammamizga O'zing panoh ber Robbim! Ahmad Fotih @islomvaolim

😢21

12 Apr 2022, 17:00 UTC171 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

#МашаАллоҳ Ўзбекистондаги Ҳатми Қуръон бўлаётган масжидларда 80% ни Водийлик қорилар имомликка ўтиб, таровеҳ намозларини ўқиб бермоқда экан... Водий яни Андижон, Наманган ва Фарғона вилояти қорилари хақида домла жаоматга гапириб берди..👇 https://telegram.me/joinchat/AAAAAD_lW99cezw409xXGA

9 Apr 2022, 12:15 UTC204 viewsread 12 August 2026

Муҳаммад Сиддиқ Миншавийнинг вафоти хабари отаси шайх Сиддиқ Миншавийни у қадар маҳзун қилмади. Муҳаммад Сиддиқ Миншавий ўзи туғилган шаҳри Миншот шаҳрига кeлтирилиб, қабристонга олиб бордилар. Ўғлининг дафн қилинаётганини кўрган Сиддиқ Миншавий қаттиқ йиғлай бошлади. Атрофидагилар у кишидан нeга ўғлининг вафоти этганини эшитган вақт йиғламай, у дафн қилинаётганда йиғлаётганини сўрадилар. Шайх Сиддиқ Миншавий: " Мeн

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @islomvaolim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Islom va olim 📔” (@islomvaolim), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islomvaolim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.