Channel
@islanderofcosm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003809736357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @islanderofcosm |
| Description | Пишу огромный фанфик и учусь рисовать. She/her |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/islanderofcosm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 14 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 14 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 12 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 422 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 32.7% | |
| 💘 | 13 | 23.6% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 21.8% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎀🎀 Порасуждаю ещё. ОБЕЩАЮ завтра перечитать третью главу и сделать второй черновик, но пока что мне хочется поговорить. 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Ии заменит всех творцов. Окей. Заменит вообще все технические профессии. Окей. И вообще изобретут роботов, которые будут делать все. Людям не придётся работать, можно будет целыми днями сидеть дома. Что останется от человека? Из-за скандала с Монеточкой я задалась этим вопросом,…
💘1🔥1
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Я тут решила почитать ещё один спин-офф... Я только первую часть прочитала пока, поэтому делаю выводы только исходя из прочитанного, позже уже буду полный отзыв писать. И ладно, очевидно, что у Бесконечных есть дети. У Страсти, например. У Сна тоже. Но духовный сын Судьбы..? От какой-то бывшей шлюхи? Иногда реально кажется, что "Песочного человека" используют как способ выплеснуть вдохновение под приходом…
❤1💘1
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Пс: решила изменить оформление и некоторые хэштеги, потихоньку буду менять оформление прошлых постов, чтобы красиво было. Я тут немного работала мозгами, размышляла насчёт позиций в философии и, честно, меня разрывает. Я не учёная в этой сфере, но меня это очень интересует. Подчеркну интересные лично для меня позиции: 🎀🎀🎀 Эмоции первичны, опыт — вторичен. Есть несколько позиций с подобным утверждением,…
❤2💋1🕊1
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Мэттморфы — нездоровый пейринг. Я думаю, это и так было понятно. Отбросим каноничную предысторию Мэттью и возьмём мою. Мэттью родился в 1970 году, пинал всю жизнь хуи, пытался играть в музыкальных группах, в университете спился и подсел на вещества. От них умер в 1993 году во сне. Так и попал в мир Морфея. Пусть он и существует достаточно долго, но нравы его остались в двадцатом веке. Я не пишу об этом …
❤2💋1🕊1
Моя сестра сделала по Песочному человеку такую красоту. #вайб
❤1💋1💘1🕊1
Как же я борюсь с желанием расписать систему, которую придумала для фанфика. Но так нельзя. #щп
❤2💘1🕊1
#музыка
❤1💋1💘1🕊1
Я придумала очередной поворот сюжета. Морфей появится в сюжете дай бог когда-нибудь. Не знаю, будет ли пейринг в фанфике вообще. Ну либо будет, но в очень-очень маленьком количестве, ведь цель фф изменилась. #фанфик
❤2💋1💘1🕊1
Чем дальше я копаю во всякую философию, тем больше понимаю, что пока идеалисты, материалисты и прочие мечтатели спорят, солипсисты просто принимают реальность такой, какая она есть со своим: "Да вы все плод моего сознания". Синдром гг существует. #щп
💘2❤1💋1🕊1
Короче нет, Мэттью не проработанный глубокий персонаж, надо принять его таким, какой он есть. Не всем дано быть умными. #фанфик
❤1👍1💋1💘1🕊1
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Я очень необъективный зритель, так как мне есть, с чем сравнивать. Я не читала "Одиссею", но если сравнивать с мьюзиклом, то идеал где-то посередине. 🎀Во-первых, где посейдон и зевс... это личные придирки. Мне конкретно какой момент был нужен: когда Одиссей ослепил Полифема, циклоп пожаловался отцу. В фильме наказание преподнесли как буквально наказание за то, что он ранил сына Посейдона. Может, так и было…
❤2🕊1
Я сегодня схожу на Одиссею. Единственное, что меня расстраивает — это отсутствие у Посейдона там голоса Стивена Родригеса (я даже не знаю, будет ли там Посейдон, честно), я слишком привыкла к Эпику. #щп
💘1🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @islanderofcosm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 786,650 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Берег” (@islanderofcosm), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islanderofcosm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.