Channel
@iskatel_fantzer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
170subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002695992606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iskatel_fantzer |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iskatel_fantzer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 170 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 170 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (26 March 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 75 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
156 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 82 | 52.6% | |
| ❤ | 71 | 45.5% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.641% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.641% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как я в продакты пошел и зачем? Самый честный и ёмкий ответ: "захотел делать сам" В какой-то момент я внятно ощутил, что мне надоело занимать экспертную позицию. Вместо отчётов с рекомендациями захотелось брать ответственность за решение и делать ручками Конечно, к этим мыслям подталкивало и стремительное развитие ИИ, и интеграция этих инструментов в работу: 1. С одной стороны, ты как исследователь уже можешь сл…
🔥19
Больше не в исследованиях Дискаверить я продолжу, но уже в роли продакта. Последний год я активно шёл к этому трансферу. И вот месяц, как это случилось Пока скажу, что мне очень сложно. Это хорошо заметно по активности в канале. Было мне совсем не до этого. Но чуть-по-чуть я начинаю чувствовать контроль над ситуацией, а значит, возвращаюсь к вещанию Чем же я теперь занимаюсь? Нынче я отвечаю за внутренний инструме…
🔥21❤2🙏1
Превращаем ТГ-чат в базу знаний Или как составить каталог ваших снов Представим, что вы решили изучить новую нишу, например бегунов. Вы вступили в чатик сообщества, нажали пару кнопок и выкачали всю историю чата, а после проанализировали её и составили портрет пользователя. Или вы решили сделать базу знаний из рабочего чата, где за последние пару лет набралось много ценных инсайтов и важных файлов. А может, вы ре…
🔥7❤1
Google NotebookLM + Claude Сейчас собираю карту работ JTBD опираясь на интервью, которые лежат в NotebookLM, Claude получает результат без галлюцинаций (часть анализа происходит внутри самого NotebookLM) и экономит токены И всё из одного окна. Малина, ей богу NotebookLM супер сильный инструмент для работы с базой данных. Его можно использовать как посредника для фактчекинга, первичного разбора, а дальше уже додел…
🔥10
Тему с транскрибацией можно закрывать Делал опрос про личный транскрибатор. Лидер: «работает на компе, полностью бесплатно» (37%) Расскажу, чем пользуюсь сам. Про локальный тоже будет Вот несколько примеров того, как я работаю с Grok API На groq.com получаешь ключ за минуту, нужна только рега. Это доступ к Whisper large-v3-turbo Лимиты на бесплатном тарифе (проверял на своих задачах): — 20 запросов в минуту — 2 00…
🔥8😢1
Выбросим слайды на свалку Презентация может сильно повлиять на восприятие вашего материала. Как усилить его, так и наоборот На этой неделе у меня было два выступления: 1. Демо на 40 человек с результатами нашей работы и дальнейшими планами, весьма серьёзная и ответственная штука 2. Вайбовая встреча для команды дизайнеров, где я просто поделился вдохновляющими меня ИИ-практиками Чекайте, что натворил. Картинки в л…
🔥12
Кло, Алло? Моя любимая игрушка, реально В феврале я настроил OpenClaw Это бесплатный open source проект, который позволяет развернуть своего агента помощника на сервере. Фишка в том, что он может жить в мессенджере и состоять из умений, которые вы сами ему сделаете Бота зовут Уинслоу. Он маленький мышонок, потому что я так придумал)) Пример умений, рассмотрим в течение дня: 09:00 — в чате уже лежит дайджест. Ра…
❤14🔥1
Мое ограничение – насмотренность Вчера моя девушка впервые открыла терминал и Claude Code. Через 30 минут показала мне такую игрушку Какой кайф! За рабочей беготнёй, автоматизациями и мыслями про запуск новых «супер полезных продуктов» забываешь, что вайбкодить можно просто по фану Мне кажется, когда ты просто веселишься, есть самый правильный подход к освоению чего-то нового. Никаких ожиданий, просто пробуешь, и…
❤4🔥2🕊1
Нужен личный быстрый транскрибатор из аудио в текст?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
искатель фантазёр pinned «Дарим подписку на Claude и Сопровод 5 победителей получат: • месячную подписку на Claude — ИИ-инструмент для разработки, написания текстов, автоматизации рутины и ещё много чего (победителю поможем настроить) • подписку на Сопровод — AI-сервис, который…»
Дарим подписку на Claude и Сопровод 5 победителей получат: • месячную подписку на Claude — ИИ-инструмент для разработки, написания текстов, автоматизации рутины и ещё много чего (победителю поможем настроить) • подписку на Сопровод — AI-сервис, который помогает адаптировать резюме под вакансии, чтобы быстрее и проще откликаться на подходящие позиции Условия участия: Подписаться на каналы ниже: • черевков / искат…
❤5
Давно обещал вам подарочки В феврале я испытал детский восторг Вспомните, как впервые построили дом из подушек, собрали свой первый конструктор или открыли первые цветные карандаши и с предвкушением посмотрели на чистый лист бумаги Так вот, я установил Claude Code и попробовал программировать Это отдельная история, которой я уже делился выше. А пока хочу коротко рассказать, как я использую Claude на регулярной ос…
❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @iskatel_fantzer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Нужен личный быстрый транскрибатор из аудио в текст?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,025,691 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“искатель фантазёр” (@iskatel_fantzer), 170 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iskatel_fantzer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.