![Telegram profile photo for [дышите кожей]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/01/015e365c61a99e48d879a16a22f4b22853c6afe3ec7454ad39273e721cf7ab65.jpg)
Channel
@ishkinina_dr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
72subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002985832310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ishkinina_dr |
| Description | здесь об уходе за кожей и работе врача дерматолога-косметолога 🧴👩🏽⚕️ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ishkinina_dr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 72 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 72 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
251 reactions across 10 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 34.7% | |
| 🤣 | 47 | 18.7% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 13.9% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 3.59% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 2.79% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 2.79% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 2.79% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 2.79% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 2.79% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.39% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 2.39% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.59% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.797% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.797% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.398% | |
| 6 further kinds | 6 | 2.39% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 22 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кажется, пора вернуться из затишья 💤 На прошлой неделе я была в отпуске, который начался довольно продуктивно,а именно — с поездки в Москву на конгресс Pro Ageless 2026🌟 За эти два дня, проведённые в столице, удалось послушать множество интересных докладов, отметить моменты, которые можно использовать в своей практике, а также насладиться атмосферой научных мероприятий: перебежками между залами, чтобы успеть послушат…
❤14🔥5❤🔥3
Диалоги из поликлиники 💭 👩🏽⚕️: принимаете на постоянной основе какие-либо препараты? 👩🏼🦰: нет 👩🏽⚕️: *назначаю лечение* 👩🏼🦰: а эти препараты будут нормально комбинироваться противоэпилептическими? 👩🏽⚕️: ? 👩🏼🦰: у меня эпилепсия, 11 лет уже принимаю препараты *перечисляет* 👩🏽⚕️: 🥴
🤣11😭7
Яночка Владимирова 🤝 «папулка к папулке» проработала сегодня мои глаза препаратом Revi eye 💜 За счет гиалуроновой кислоты и трегалозы в составе он позволяет закрыть сразу несколько потребностей: 🩷уменьшить отечность и улучшить цвет кожи (убрать «синюшность») 🩷проработать мелкие морщины 🩷увлажнить кожу
❤15❤🔥3🎉1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤8😢5🥴3🙏3👀1👎1💘1
🔉со звуком, пожалуйста поликлинике делают кабинет МРТ *рада,но не от всего сердца* так было наверное час без перерыва, не знаю что можно так долго сверлить. Общение с пациентами в это время велось на повышенных тонах 😒
😱7😢4🤬1🫡1
Пациент, 79 лет 👴🏼: Спасибо вам большое. Так мне помогли. Вы — прекрасный специалист, не часто встретишь таких замечательных врачей. А то я был тут в октябре, сидела — ну такая постарше вас доктор, но просите, не хочу обижать, никакой вообще пользы не было. 👀но в прошлый раз тоже была я 👀
🤣36😁7😈3🤡2
Сегодня после рабочего дня Яна Владимировна выкроила время, чтобы выполнить мне химический пилинг. Я — человек с телеангиоэктатической розацией🤩, склонный к мгновенному покраснению от всего и вся, и отношусь к пилингам с осторожностью. Но тут у нас в клинике появилась новая пилинговая система TASKER, после которой не только отсутствует ярко выраженная эритема, шелушение и период реабилитации, но и появляется эффект g…
❤14🔥8⚡4🎄1👀1💔1
Выхожу из затишья и делюсь с вами красивыми губами ☎️💄
❤20🔥12💋7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🙏4👍3😎1
Часто пациенты приходят на прием с целью сделать одну какую-либо «волшебную» 🪄процедуру и получить желаемый эффект, но, к сожалению, в реальной жизни так не работает. Если вы хотите реально заметных и стойких результатов после посещения кабинета врача-косметолога, тогда нужно помнить, что только комплексный подход, профессиональное планирование и регулярное выполнение рекомендаций позволяют видеть действительно впеча…
❤11🔥10😍6😇1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ishkinina_dr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 115,769 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[дышите кожей]” (@ishkinina_dr), 72 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ishkinina_dr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.