Channel
@iscvolga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
317subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001390686063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iscvolga |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iscvolga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 317 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 316 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 316 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 560 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Калигула: покупка лояльности ключевой коалиции «О, если бы у римского народа была одна шея!» Калигула, разъярённый тем, что толпа в цирке болеет за «не ту» команду: «Utinam populus Romanus unam cervicem haberet!» — «О, если бы у римского народа была одна шея!» — Suetonius, Caligula, 30.2 Реплика тирана, но экономически она обнажает структуру принципата. Правитель зависит от ключевой коалиции: плебса Рима, преториан…
Август: мрамор и общественные блага Принял кирпичным — оставил мраморным Знаменитая фраза Августа, приводимая Светонием: «Marmoream se relinquere, quam latericiam accepisset» — «Он оставляет [Рим] мраморным, приняв кирпичным». — Suetonius, Divus Augustus, 28.3 Акведуки, форумы, дороги, порт Остии, храмы, базилики — это одновременно общественные блага по Самуэльсону (неисключаемые, несоперничающие, недопроизводимые р…
Нерон: инфляционный налог Порча денария — сеньораж как политический выбор Август оставил денарий с содержанием серебра около 98%. В 64 г. н. э. Нерон снижает чистоту примерно до 80% и добавляет ~10% меди. Это первая крупная порча римской монеты — и точка невозврата. Экономически это классический сеньораж как скрытый налог — механизм, который формализуют в XX веке Кейган и Фридман. Император, не готовый ни расширить…
❤1
Веспасиан: pecunia non olet Деньги не пахнут — фискальная социология в одной фразе Когда сын Тит упрекает Веспасиана за налог на общественные уборные, тот подносит монету к его носу и говорит: «Atqui e lotio est» — «А ведь она из мочи». — Suetonius, Vespasianus, 23.3 Отсюда — крылатое pecunia non olet. Экономически это принцип широкой и наименее искажающей налоговой базы: облагать нужно всё, что даёт устойчивый по…
Тиберий: сохранение налоговой базы Хорошему пастуху подобает стричь овец, а не сдирать с них шкуру Тиберий пишет наместникам, требующим повысить налоги в провинциях: «Boni pastoris est tondere pecus, non deglubere» — «Хорошему пастуху подобает стричь овец, а не сдирать с них шкуру». — Suetonius, Tiberius, 32.2 Это античная формулировка принципа сохранения налоговой базы — того самого, вокруг которого через 19 веков…
Двенадцать цезарей глазами институциональной экономики Гай Светоний Транквилл, секретарь императора Адриана, во II в. н. э. написал «Жизнь двенадцати цезарей» — от Юлия Цезаря до Домициана. Для филолога это памятник биографического жанра. Для экономиста-институционалиста — редкий по чистоте лабораторный журнал: один режим (принципат), двенадцать «CEO», зафиксированные исходы за 150 лет. Такой панельной выборки нам …
Дорогие друзья, коллеги, партнёры и амбассадоры ИНК! 25 июля 2026 года Институту научных коммуникаций исполнилось 10 лет. Десять лет назад, в 2016 году, в Волгограде родилась площадка, которая поставила перед собой, казалось бы, невозможную задачу — сделать так, чтобы российский учёный был услышан мировым научным сообществом, а его труд получил достойную оценку и признание. За эти годы ИНК прошёл путь от небольшой …
❤7
https://risk-practice.ru/magazine/128/mirovaya-ekonomika-v-ozhidanii-novogo/ Мировая экономика в ожидании нового равновесия
https://stanural.ru/elena-popkova-iz-rudn-otmechaet-rost-sprosa-na-rynke-truda-i-rabota-ru/ Елена Попкова из РУДН отмечает рост спроса на рынке труда и Работа.ру
https://smotrim.ru/audio/2866245
https://smotrim.ru/audio/2849516
https://russian.rt.com/russia/news/1607737-ekspert-rabota-obrazovanie
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iscvolga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Институт научных коммуникаций” (@iscvolga), 317 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iscvolga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.