Channel
@isaacsbrain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002616151641 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @isaacsbrain |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/isaacsbrain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 59 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 59 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 32.9% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 20.3% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 6.33% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 2 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @isaacsbrain. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 February 2026 to 2 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Добавил загрузки в свой браузер, и кстати, не засирает папку Downloads на пк, а в ней создает папку для загрузок моего браузера, как делает телега. А да... Я же забыл сказать что создаю свою браузер в свободное время помимо проекта на анриле🤣 Подпишись —> Isaac's Brain | GameDev
❤7
🔎ЭПИЗОДИЧЕСКАЯ СТРУКТУРА Уроки чужих ошибок, которые могут помочь: Poppy Playtime — главы выходят с огромными перерывами, каждая глава пытается быть «больше и эпичнее» предыдущей, что привело к инфляции масштаба. К третьей главе от камерного хоррора не осталось ничего. Bendy and the Ink Machine — пять глав, но тональность гуляет. Некоторые главы — стелс, некоторые — экшен, одна — почти босс-раш. Нет единого геймпл…
👍4
🎮 От теории к практике: как это работает в Poppy Playtime 5 В прошлом посте разбирали, как настроить рендеринг, чтобы объекты не проходили сквозь стены когда в руках. Теперь смотрим на живой пример из закадрового разбора игры. Спойлер: там реально крошечные модели рук. 🔎 В чем фишка? Камера висит вплотную к ним. За счет близости они кажутся огромными (законы перспективы), но физически модель настолько мала, что: …
🔥3
Проверено успешно✅ Подпишись —> Isaac's Brain | GameDev
👍3
Многие годы разработчики на UE мучились с проблемой «прохождения» рук и оружия сквозь стены. Приходилось либо городить костыли с двумя камерами, либо писать сложные шейдеры с Custom Depth. В версиях c 5.5 появилась Native First Person Rendering — родная система рендеринга объектов от первого лица. В чем суть? Теперь вы можете пометить любой меш как First Person. Движок будет рендерить его особым образом: Свой FOV:…
❤4
Если кто-то когда-то захочет реализовать подбор предметов, очень советую изучить компоненты для Physics Handle по ссылке ниже, это документация от Epic Games. Пока сам прорабатываю эту логику, но узнал много интересного, почему это работает в Unreal Engine например лучше чем в Unity, хотя не спорю, в Unity это сделать легко и быстро, а тут пришлось повозиться чтобы разобраться, но это тоже не с проста. https://dev.…
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
🎉5
В целом доделал модельку... (еще вчера, просто сегодня делал мелкие правки, фиксил свои ошибки, мне еще нужно сделать нормальную UV развертку и материалы) Первый вариант как он есть, а второй просто с открытым отсеком для вставки аккумулятора чтобы запустить. Суть проста, запитываешь электричеством, он начинает подсвечивать постер и при нажатии на кнопку будет выдана краткая информация в виде озвучки. По бокам если…
❤4👍2
А мне тут сделали наклейку по автарке, ну имба же, согласитесь 🔥
🔥7
Я тут пока делаю модель для одного проекта, как доделаю итоговый вариант без материалов, скину.
🥰4🔥1
Мельница Инди Игр Друзья, небольшая реклама от меня — приглашаю в тёплое сообщество разработчиков и игроков. --- Коротко о нас - 200+ участников; актив каждый день (не все к сожалению, но актив имеется). - Поддержка в разработке: советы, обмен опытом, помощь с багами и балансом. - Регулярные созвоны: показы прогресса, честный и конструктивный фидбек, тестирование игр. - Тематические встречи: обсуждения игр, DnD, н…
🔥5
Кабель для одного проекта наконец-то доделан Кучу нервов она стоила мне, много раз переделывал, в итоге проблема оказалось в другом, но сейчас он очень хорошо оптимизирован и работает 100% без сюрпризов и багов! Спасибо кстати Валерию, за техническое сопровождение, мозг без него вскипел бы раньше нужного.
🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @isaacsbrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,159,486 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Isaac's Brain | GameDev” (@isaacsbrain), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/isaacsbrain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.