3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,908–3,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 19:25
3,909
-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:53
3,915
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:02
3,915
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 09s
Average length
1m 05s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
868 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
280
32.3%
❤
266
30.6%
👌
106
12.2%
🤣
34
3.92%
😁
33
3.80%
😢
32
3.69%
🤩
29
3.34%
👏
24
2.76%
❤🔥
20
2.30%
⚡
14
1.61%
🤔
14
1.61%
🥴
5
0.576%
🔥
4
0.461%
🕊
3
0.346%
💔
2
0.23%
😱
1
0.115%
🫡
1
0.115%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 868reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2023 to 12 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irtraderz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 February 2023 to 12 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
درود بر شما همراهان گرامی،
بعد از یه وقفه طولانی تصمیم گرفتم دوباره روی اپلیکیشن دستیار تریدر کار کنم.
با یکی از بهترین دولوپرهای اندروید روش کار میکنیم،
یه نسخه اولیه ریلیز شده و خوشحال میشم که فیدبک شما رو داشته باشم برای بهتر شدنش.
بعدا خیلی کامل و با جزئیات از هدفم و امکانات عالی این اپلیکیشن براتون مینویسم.
به کمک شما برای هرچه بهتر شدن اپلیکیشن نیاز دارم.
بهترین فیدبکها و بهترین پیشنهادات برای کاملتر کردن امکا…
پیشنهاد میکنم لایو مشترک محمد جرجندی و ماهان تیموری رو ببینید...
شاید تلنگری باشه برا ذهنهای فریبخوردهمون.
چیزی که با عنوان آموزش رایگان ارائه میشه هم یه نوع دیگر از این اتفاقه که داره میافته... (کمی پیچیدهتر و زیرکانهتر ولی با هدف مشترک)
یه مشت گاو از من پکیج خریدن#پکیج#فارکس
ظاهراً ایرانی هستیم ولی نامهای اعراب بر ما نهاده شده.
از تمام جزییات واقعی یا من درآوردی واقعه کربلا خبر داریم مثل شیر صحرای کربلا ولی از تاریخ کشور خود خیلی نمیدانیم.
میدانید چرا وضعیت کشورمان چنین بحرانی است
چون لایقش هستیم و به نیاکان خود خیانت کرده ایم و نفرین آنها گریبان ما را گرفته.
این مرز و بوم را دودستی تقدیم بیگانه میکنیم و آنها را میپرستیمولی تاریخ خونین پدران خود را نمیدانیم.
ننگ بر من که سکوت کر…
گزارش جابویژن در خصوص دستمزد های شغل ها در 1401 و 1402 در ایران
صفحه 225 رو ببینید، شما اگر یه تحلیلگر ساده هم باشید (نه تریدر) فقط تحلیل بکنید، البته اصولی و حرفهای!!
خیلی راحت میتونید ماهی بیشتر از 17 میلیون درآمد کسب کنید. با کار در شرکتهای سرمایهگذاری
قابل توجه دوستانی که از نبود سرمایه رنج میبرن و تحلیلگرهای قابلی هستن
لینک مستقیم دانلود از سایت جابویژن
https://fileapi.jobvision.ir/public-files/reports/…
برای چه خوشحالیم؟
فراموش نمیکنیم جوانانی که کشته شدند.
فراموش نمیکنیم عزیزانی که در بند ضحاکند.
فراموش نمیکنیم مادرانی که پارهی تنشان پر پر شد.
عید؟
کدام عید؟
سوگواران را مجال بازدید و دید نیست
باز گرد ای عید از زندان که ما را عید نیست
گفتنِ لفظِ مبارکبادِ طوطی در قفس
شاهد آئینه دل داند که جز تقلید نیست
عید نوروزی که از بیداد ضحاکی عزاست
هر که شادی میکند از دودهی جمشید نیست
وای بر شهری که در آن مزد مردانِ …
اثر دانینگ کروگر یا Dunning kruger effect چیست؟
سوگیری اثر دانینگ کروگر یک پدیدهی روانشناختی است که در آن افراد با کمترین توانایی و تسلط در یک موضوع، خود را به عنوان شایستهترین افراد ارزیابی میکنند!
افرادی که کمترین دانش و اطلاعات را در مورد یک موضوع دارند، توانایی تشخیص اشتباهات و خطاهای خود را ندارند و این موضوع باعث میشود هنگام ارزیابی کردن خودشان اشتباه کنندبه زبان ساده، افراد برای ارزیابی مهارتها و کاستیه…
در سال 1999،دانینگ و کروگر نتایج تحقیقات اولیه خود را در مورد پدیده اثر دانینگ-کروگر Dunning kruger effect منتشر کردند. در این مطالعه از 45 دانشجوی دوره کارشناسی دانشگاه کرنل خواسته شد تا یک تست استدلال منطقی 20 مادهای را تکمیل کنند و سپس از آنها خواسته شد توانایی و عملکرد خود را در آزمون ارزیابی کنند، به این صورت که بگویند توانایی استدلال عمومیشان در مقایسه با همکلاسیها، در کدام صدک قرار میگیرد. به علاوه از آنه…
دانشجویان ضعیف، تصور میکردند که (به طور متوسط) به 14.2 مسئله به درستی پاسخ داده اند، در حالی که در واقعیت، میانگین نمرهی آنها 6.6 بود! و افرادی که کمترین امتیاز را کسب کرده بودند اعتقاد داشتند که عملکردی بالاتر از حد متوسط دارند.
چه کسانی دچار دانینگ-کروگر میشوند؟
متأسفانه همه ما گاهی تحت تاثیر اثر سوگیری شناختی دانیگ کروگر قرار میگیریم. مخصوصا اگر در یک زمینه متخصص باشیم. مثلا یک دانشمند باهوش، لزوما نویسنده…
چند راهکار برای مواجهه با سوگیری اثر دانینگ کروگر Dunning kruger effect
1. مهربان باشید
شخصی که دچار اثر دانینگ کروگر باشد، حالت تدافعی بالایی دارد. پس نباید از انتقادهای خشک و مستقیم و یا تنبیه استفاده کنید. این کار نتیجه عکس میدهد.
2. نمایش عملکرد عالی
تشویق دیگران و استفاده از مثال، باعث میشود تا افراد به عملکرد خودشان نگاه کنند و خطاهایشان را تشخیص دهند. این کار در عین شفافیت، از حالت تدافعی جلوگیری میکند.
…
درود دوستان گرامی
تصمیم گرفتم تعداد اعضای کانال یوتیوبام به 1000 نفر رسید شروع به تهیه ویدیو آموزشی در مورد روش معاملاتی آلفونسو بکنم.
و مطالبی که یاد گرفتم رو از صفر باهاتون به اشتراک بگذارم.
https://www.youtube.com/c/SaeidBQrn
دوستانی که تازه به جمع ما پیوستند حتما پیشنهاد میکنم این چند ویدیو از آنتون کریل رو که برای نمونه داخل کانال یوتیوب قرار دادیم رو ببینن.
میتونه دیدگاه مناسبی ایجاد کنه!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0EKH7OeTDo
👍6🤣2❤1
Signed SAEID.B ✰
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irtraderz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
لطفا اگر حتما تمایل به شرکت دارید گزینهی خودتون رو انتخاب کنید.
درغیر اینصورت از گزینههای دیگه استفاده کنید.
MINTEDSEED دیدگاه جدید پرایس اکشن15%
Phantom Trading 2023 دوره اسمارت مانی با جدیدترین آپدیتها16%
PTM 2 دورهی فاندامنتال جدید آنتون کریل با توضیحات بیشتر26%
خنثی هستم و نیازی به ترجمه نمیبینم.10%
نتایج!34%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2023 to 12 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 998,030 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جامعه معامله گران بازارهای مالی” (@irtraderz), 3,909 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irtraderz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.