Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐧

Channel

𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐧

@iron_grinn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002079351469
TypeChannel
Username@iron_grinn
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iron_grinn

Growth

135136135.510 August 2026 — 136 subscribers11 August 2026 — 136 subscribers25 August 2026 — 135 subscribers10 August 202625 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 13:02135-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:06136no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:01136first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.3%
avg views ÷ 135 subscribers
Avg views / post
54.4
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held5 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total272
Reactions total71
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53593727759265476782332.4%
custom 52559650044143293461825.4%
custom 5251287235273171000912.7%
custom 5359722605307768941912.7%
custom 535943454614619504368.45%
custom 525366428492314287922.82%
custom 529678877593699246222.82%
custom 532330644948337228122.82%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC32 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

частный сектор синегорья возможно самый элитный, потому что при виде этих аккуратных домиков с облагороженной территорией вокруг я на долю секунды забыла, что нахожусь в магаданской области. а пушистый барбос на цепи очень ласковый и дружелюбный

custom 52559650044143293465custom 53593727759265476784custom 53233064494833722812custom 53594345461461950432custom 52512872352731710001

9 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC45 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

синегорье • горы ли это, не могу сказать, но на первый взгляд они правда синие • въезд и центральная улица заполнены пустующими пятиэтажками, словно поселок вымер • вглубь от центра ухоженные белые ленинградки с пластиковыми окнами и магазинами • стоят две девятиэтажки, одна с современным в марте установленным лифтом, во второй не были • улицами и дворами заправляют собаки, стоит уважать и не тревожить

custom 53593727759265476785custom 53597226053077689413custom 52512872352731710002custom 52559650044143293461custom 52967887759369924621

8 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC51 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52512872352731710005custom 52559650044143293463custom 53593727759265476783custom 52536642849231428791custom 53597226053077689411

8 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC68 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

мыться речной водой под открытым небом и готовить еду на костре — прелести теплой погоды тут к нашей поездке на пару дней присоединялись дождь, град, снег, и, честно сказать, это была не самая приятная часть путешествия вчера ветер прогнал тучи, по прогнозу сегодня-завтра колыма еще побалует нас безоблачным небом сегодня ночуем в ягодном, завтра курс на сусуман. остались последние деньки

custom 53593727759265476784custom 52559650044143293463custom 53597226053077689412custom 52512872352731710001custom 52536642849231428791custom 52967887759369924621custom 53594345461461950431

7 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC76 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

наконец-то оценила ширину колымы своими глазами. конечно, сейчас река может и не в самом полноводном состоянии, но все равно впечатляет. изучили памятник в честь старого моста, проехались по дебину и свернули в синегорье

custom 53593727759265476787custom 52559650044143293466custom 53594345461461950433custom 53597226053077689413

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @iron_grinn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,007,687 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐧” (@iron_grinn), 135 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iron_grinn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.