Channel
@irodareads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003628189660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irodareads |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irodareads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 169 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 166 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 168 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 157 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 156 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (13 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 443 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
240 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 32.5% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 21.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 34 | 14.2% | |
| 😁 | 34 | 14.2% | |
| 😍 | 21 | 8.75% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 7.50% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ishga kirdim. Oʻzim xohlagan, oʻzimga mos ish. Jamoa ham zoʻr, koʻpchiligini avvaldan taniyman. Yana juda kuchli jamoa. Bu mening ham oʻsishimga imkon yaratadi. Xullas, shuni fonida oʻzimning instagramimga ham aynan shu yoʻnalishda (Iroda reads) videolar joylashni oʻylab yuribman. Instagramga ham kontent qilsam, kuzatgan boʻlarmidingiz? Aytgancha, ishimni kitob oʻqishga aloqasi yoʻq) @IrodaReads
🔥12❤9🥰5
Azamat Qorjovovning kitoblariga oʻsmirlik paytlarim qiziqardim. 10 dan ortiq kitoblarini oʻqiganman. Endi negadir oʻqigim kelmay qolgan. Buning sababi, universitetda birinchi kun bizga qaysidir ustoz jurnalist (u payt jurnalistlarni tanimasdim, eslolmayman) Mustaqillik darsiga kirgan. Nutqidan bilinardi, juda bilimli odam. Shu kishi bizdan qanday kitoblar yoqadi, deb soʻraganida man A. Qorjovovniki deganman. Boshqa…
🔥3
Kitoblarimni baxti ochilib, yangi egasiga ketyapti)
❤3🔥2😍1
Menga shu kam edi🥺 Ertalab ijarachi yozibdilar, Iroda opa yongʻinni koʻrgandirsiz, xavotir olmang, uyga hech narsa qilmadi, tinch debdilar. Lekin endi podyezzda suv, svet va lift yoʻq. Qancha vaqt boʻlmasligi noma’lum. Xafa boʻlyapman @IrodaReads
🔥5
Aytish esimdam chiqibdi, telegram premiumi borlar 3 tadan reaksiya bosilar
❤🔥14❤11😍11🤩1
Koʻpincha kayfiyatim boʻlmasa, kanalimni followerlarini koʻrib chiqaman. Xursand boʻlib ketaman mani shunaqa aqlli, bilimli odamlar kuzatayotganidan. Orangizda yaqin doʻstlarim bor, hammasi yaxshi joylarda, yaxshi lavozimlarda ishlashadi. Davlat xodimlari, biznesmenlar ham bor) Hech qayerda ishlamaydigan dugonalarim ham bor. Ularga ham havas qilaman. Qachondir manam aqlli narsa yozib qolishimga ishonib, kutayotgan…
❤🔥17😁13🔥8🥰5
Bu ota uyimdagi kitoblarim. Kelinlik uyimda ham koʻp kitoblarim bor. Orzu havaslar bilan oʻzimning uyimga kitob javon yasatgan edim. Kecha uyimga kvartirantlar qoʻydim, shu uchun kitoblarim yana “uysiz” qoldi😁 Hozir shu kitobni oʻqishni boshladim. Feminist boʻlganim uchun meni ateist ham deb oʻylashadi. Unaqamasman) @IrodaReads
❤9🔥2
Kitoblarimga javon yasatishim kerak. Yoki oʻqigan kitoblarimni tarqatib yuborsammikan? Sizlar oʻqib boʻlgan kitobingizni nima qilasizlar?
❤6
Mana bu yerdan meni topinglar, yaxshisi.
❤8😍7🔥3
3 kundan beri kitob oʻqimayapman. Kitob oʻqishli mood’da emasman negadir. Yoki bu “Atom odatlar” menga yoqmadi😂 Balki ingliz tilimni mustahkamlashim kerakligi haqidagi xayollarim tinchlik bermayotgandir, xudo biladi))
😁5❤3
Aytish esimdan chiqibdi, shuni oʻqiyapman. Kaaaam kamdan oʻqiyapman. Qolgan vaqt yuuuuuribman. Napaleon ham qildim. Koʻp vaqtim shuni deb isrof boʻldi🥺
❤11😁1
Qaysi birini tanlaymiz? “Home body” bilan “Milk and honey”ni chiqarib yuborsak boʻlar a?😅
🤩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @irodareads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IrodaReads” (@irodareads), 169 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irodareads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.