Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

эмовамп в архиве

@irnsvk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

46subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001507413403
TypeChannel
Username@irnsvk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/irnsvk

Growth

4611 Aug 2026, 00:16 — 46 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 23:52 — 46 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:1611 Aug 2026, 23:52
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 23:5246no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:1646first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍342.9%
🤮342.9%
🥰114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2024 to 29 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2024, 18:01 UTC364 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

я тут если чо 😇

🤮3🥰1

Signed soobinstan.2007

28 Sept 2024, 18:01 UTC348 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kuchizuoFile

File, posted without a caption

Signed soobinstan.2007

28 Sept 2024, 18:01 UTC343 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @n1portPhoto

📍LOVELIST : 永遠の愛 🔇i luvvv u 🔇 замени мне воздух 🎀 в этой папке находятся каналы, которыми я восхищаюсь, слежу и люблю. не переставайте сиять, крошки! я вас сильно люблю, надеюсь, вы достигните еще больше успеха!🎀 🎀 : click うわっ❤

Signed soobinstan.2007

22 Sept 2024, 05:42 UTC246 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @meroyaaPhoto

ㅤㅤ* crush lißt . ‹ yɐméro ㅤ* ㅤㅤヤメロ ’ ɯith 💉ㅤ lúv ! в данной папке собраны каналы, которыми я восхищаюсь и слежу за их творчеством. прошу не обижаться, если вы не увидели свой канал здесь. я постаралась никого не забыть ㅤㅤ ‘ㅤ‹ ♡тык ›

Signed soobinstan.2007

16 Sept 2024, 15:01 UTC224 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 𝗰𝗿𝘂𝘀𝗵: 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁. 📍〔 фаворuты нuрваны 〕 𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗉 𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗳𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗿. < 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇? 👤: в данной папке собраны все мои любимые каналы, за которыми я так или иначе слежу. » 🔥 «

Signed soobinstan.2007

16 Sept 2024, 13:07 UTC206 viewsread 11 August 2026

этот канал останется как архив

Signed soobinstan.2007

16 Sept 2024, 13:01 UTC168 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @kuchizuoPhoto

s⃨o⃨n⃨der — 清澈 / 20𝟮𝟰 🚘` let me see it go [ @kuchizuo ] u⃨p⃨ a⃨n⃨d⃨ d⃨o⃨w⃨n⃨

Signed soobinstan.2007

16 Sept 2024, 12:17 UTC179 viewsread 11 August 2026

я почти доделала все штобы перейти на другой канал

Signed soobinstan.2007

28 Aug 2024, 18:08 UTC187 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @alleuwerPhoto

▫️ почему корейские женщины собираются в твиттере и просят о помощи у всего мира? что такое чаты и deepfakes? что такое движение 4B и почему мы должны помочь девушкам из кореи ; длинный и информативный thread🧵 ▫️

Signed soobinstan.2007

23 Aug 2024, 13:06 UTC197 viewsread 11 August 2026

как думаете лучше новый канал создать или этот оставить

Signed soobinstan.2007

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @irnsvk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 676,778 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“эмовамп в архиве” (@irnsvk), 46 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irnsvk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.