Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Секрет редактора

@irmesh_detected

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

830subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777186682
TypeChannel
Username@irmesh_detected
Created21 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/irmesh_detected

Growth

8306 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 830 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:51 — 830 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:017 Aug 2026, 05:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 829–831 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:51830no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:01830first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 830 subscribers
Avg views / post
309
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held13 (23 April 202518 July 2026)
Views total617
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11435.0%
😁7422.7%
💔3510.7%
👍309.20%
❤‍🔥247.36%
😍144.29%
👏123.68%
🕊123.68%
👀113.37%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC198 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, как вам, а мне сильно напомнило

👀7😁3

15 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC419 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тот случай, когда перевод названия нравится больше оригинала

😁18🔥12👏3

22 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTC501 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Только что нашла самую худшую аннотацию в своей жизни. Это даже не спойлер, а СПОЙЛЕРИЩЕ. Присылайте в комментарии свои находки книжных факапов!

💔13😁10🔥1

15 Jan 2026, 15:36 UTC902 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @seven_towersPhoto

Получил радостную новость, что 🗼«Семиградье. Летопись 2. Травы на Пепле» отпечатано и скоро появится на полках. Самое время вспомнить с чего все начиналось и сказать немного слов благодарности. Создание второй части трилогии оказалось сложным делом и растянулось на несколько лет. Сценарий я начал разрабатывать в августе 2023 года, когда вовсю шли переговоры об издании 🗼«Семян Перемен». Тогда же, после вдохновляющей

🔥13👍2

16 Jun 2025, 13:58 UTC≈1,440 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @detectivetruePhoto

Книга: Яд империи Автор: Надежда Салтанова Жанр: исторический детектив Оценка: 5 из 5 Бонус: ловите рецепт настоя «для душевного успокоения». Равные горсти душицы, мелиссы, тимьяна смешать, добавить щепоть иссопа, залить половиной секстария (0, 5л) только что вскипяченной воды. Пить перед закатом и утром после еды. Если тоска долго держится, то добавить пару щепоток зверобоя. Если что, в книге полно рецептов травяны

🔥23👀3👍2🕊1😍1

15 Jun 2025, 13:27 UTC947 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Нашла краткий конспект составляющих хорошей истории (романов в том числе). Нужно, наверное, его включить в свою лекцию для писателей. (Из книги "Пошумим. Как делать хитовые подкасты")

🔥12👍5❤‍🔥3👏2

13 Jun 2025, 11:42 UTC691 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

По детективу "Безупречные создания" вышел фильм!

😍6👍4❤‍🔥2🔥2👏1

13 Jun 2025, 11:42 UTC808 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @emikhaleva

Долгожданный короткометражный фильм выпускников Института кино НИУ ВШЭ 2025 г. смотрим здесь: https://vkvideo.ru/video-201853900_456239116 Благодарю вас за выбор моей книги и создание этого незабываемого волшебства! Всем, кто в кадре и вне его, шлю моё большое ❤️ До сих пор не могу до конца поверить в то, что этот небольшой, но такой яркий фильм, стал реальностью! В условиях ограниченного бюджета и крайне жёстких с

🔥10👍6👏4🕊1

15 May 2025, 09:45 UTC≈1,030 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🙏 молюсь за коллег. Всем сердцем за то, чтобы у книгоиздателей всё было хорошо ❤️

💔22🔥10🕊9👍6❤‍🔥2👏2👀1

28 Apr 2025, 10:25 UTC≈1,180 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Это я, которая уже прочла новые книги Лоры Кейли и Евгении Державиной, которые вы сможете купить только осенью 😊😊😊

😁33🔥5

24 Apr 2025, 16:47 UTC684 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Последняя новинка, к которой я успела приложить свою редакторскую руку 😊 "Монстр внутри" - мрачный триллер-стекло, от чтения которого невозможно оторваться, даже когда он разбивает душу на мелкие кусочки.

🔥11👍5😍3

24 Apr 2025, 16:47 UTC≈1,010 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @olivianortwoodPhoto

🏐🥎🥎 🏐🏐🏐🎾🏐 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 🤩🤩🤩 Книга: «Монстр Внутри» Автор: Оливия Нортвуд Редактор: Екатерина Ирмеш, Екатерина Тёрина Жанр: триллер, детектив 🧳Новый триллер о профайлере, составляющем профили серийных убийц. Мрачный и эмоциональный триллер, который не оставит равнодушным. Аннотация: Детектив Грейс Келлер всегда считала, что знает, как защитить жителей Сиэтла. Но недавняя трагедия выбила ее из колеи: напарник погиб,

🔥10❤‍🔥4😍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @irmesh_detected. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Секрет редактора” (@irmesh_detected), 830 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irmesh_detected.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.