Channel
@irlfortegreen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003873652930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irlfortegreen |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 28 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irlfortegreen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 39 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 39 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 June 2026 – 25 July 2026) |
| Views total | 82 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
76 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 77.6% | |
| ⚡ | 17 | 22.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Думаю, можно одолжить швабру из уборной, если, конечно, никто не возражает. Хотя, учитывая, что у нас нет участников экипажа, специализирующихся на уборке— Да, тогда и вправду никто не возражает. Бегом гонять паразитов!
❤3⚡1
Как же меня достали эти паразиты. Последняя неделя ощущается как нервотрепка, особенно когда эти лезут под руку. Если это продолжится, то я буду носить с собой огромные палки, чтобы затыкать их до смерти! Ну или… Или хотя бы отпугивать. Тоже неплохо, знаете ли.
❤3⚡1
Ты не пробовал посмотреть камеры? Может узнаешь в чем проблема. Хороший совет. Вы правы! Точно! Как я мог забыть про камеры. Конечно, в ночное время не совсем положено куда-либо ходить, так как опять же — безопасность превыше всего. Но если после этого ничего не будет ломаться (ну или как минимум я узнаю причину проблемы), то можно и пропустить один интересный сон.
❤1
Вчера чинил проводку, сегодня чиню проводку, завтра буду чинить проводки… А когда они собственно говоря - перестанут ломаться? Это цикличный процесс меня уже настолько насторожил, что я даже начал думать, что это кто-то делает намеренно, что бы отвлечь мое внимание. Если это так, то думаю, мне стоит заняться расследованием. Наверное.
⚡4
Всем привет! Долго однако меня не было. Как ваши дела? Как проживаете свои деньки? Лично у меня ничего особенного. Занимаюсь починкой проводки, думаю к вечеру закончу. А еще я очень много чихаю. Во черт.
❤3⚡2
Доброго вечера всем!
❤5⚡2
Я до последнего не хотел отвечать на твою похабщину, но терпеть тоже не собираюсь. Это далеко не моя проблема, что ты в сущности сам пошел искать мой блог, и отписывать что-то подобное. Высшая форма идиотизма.
Доброе утро... Как же все таки узко в вентиляции. Мне не удобно это записывать, но я все равно запишу. Облазил все, ничего вроде бы нет, и НЕ доброжелательных гостей я тоже не встретил. Хотя в теории, они, возможно, просто избегают меня. И слава богу...
❤2
Возможно, Оранж прав. Нас и вправду могли подслушивать, и я сам начал параноить по этому поводу. Думаю, я просто несу ночной бред, или вроде того, но убедится все же нужно. Полазаю завтра в вентиляциях, и проверю на наличие прослушки… Главное не наткнуться на неприятных гостей вроде паразитов, или кого-то другого.
⚡3❤2
Фух, интересненьким однако выдался разговорчик… Пойду-ка я в свою каюту закрадываться спать. Но перед этим за одно еще раз пройдусь по Полюсу. Проверю всех, и тогда моя душа будет спокойна. Наверное.
❤3
И да, Оранж, еще раз хочу повторить, что ты не бесполезный сотрудник, не неумелый коллега или ненужный друг. Ты не подходишь ни одну из этих категорий, и все об этом знают. Я в том числе. Мне нравятся рецепты и блюда, приготовленные от твоей руки, и устроенные пиршества, на которых мы когда-то тусили со всеми участниками экипажа. Я вообще-то, до сих пор храню фотки с каждой нашей встречи! И в каждой фотке обязательно…
❤6⚡1
Не волнуйся! Я уже тут! Прямо за твоей спиной! Привет еще раз! Оранж? Что случилось? И почему ты так встревожен? А вообще… Я не планирую обсуждать что-то прям серьезное. Я не думаю, что кто-то нуждается в прослушке обычного дружеского разговора. И тем более, какому придурку нужны чужие слезы? Какому-то шантажисту? Если да, то я лично возьму, и надаю ему по бошке, если хоть посмеет пальцем тронуть моего коллегу! И теб…
❤2⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irlfortegreen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 132,543 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мысли Форте” (@irlfortegreen), 39 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irlfortegreen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.