Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for tentative

Channel

tentative

@irishaten

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002032162184
TypeChannel
Username@irishaten
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/irishaten

Growth

1041061058 August 2026 — 106 subscribers9 August 2026 — 106 subscribers16 August 2026 — 105 subscribers10 September 2026 — 104 subscribers8 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:02104-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:16105-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:31106no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:45106first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54563013487545798633826.2%
custom 53146229404388762362517.2%
custom 54565830986091977812315.9%
custom 53415038007147425502215.2%
custom 54270978646543127472114.5%
custom 51882339714518427771510.3%
custom 520872682808413685310.69%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC69 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ну наконец-то ❤️

custom 545630134875457986316custom 531462294043887623611custom 54270978646543127478custom 52087268280841368531

31 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC133 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

серега галицкий мой новый краш и + любимый парк в копилку❤️ смотрите че он отчибучил… мы погуляли по японскому саду, и это просто восторг больше всего меня покорило внимание к деталям — абсолютно все сделано в едином стиле, как и в остальной части парка 🌿Парк Краснодар Парк Галицкого, Краснодар

custom 531462294043887623614custom 534150380071474255012custom 545630134875457986311

30 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC96 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

оффтоп активностей за неделю ❤️ в краснодаре погуляли ❤️ в теннис поиграли ❤️ на сапах покатались ❤️ в сочи парке кайфанули ❤️ много фоткались ❤️ играли в настолки и вообще очень здорово провели время! теперь устраиваем расчиллос в красе

custom 518823397145184277713custom 545630134875457986311custom 545658309860919778111

29 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC98 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

такие мы mermaid-девочки 😒

custom 542709786465431274713custom 545658309860919778112custom 534150380071474255010custom 51882339714518427772

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @irishaten. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“tentative” (@irishaten), 104 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irishaten.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.