Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ирина Потапенко - Психолог нового поколения

@irina_potapenko_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,503subscribers

+478 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596866154
TypeChannel
Username@irina_potapenko_psy
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/irina_potapenko_psy

Growth

2,0252,5032,2647 August 2026 — 2,025 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,025 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,386 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,503 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 5 days, net +478. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,953–2,575 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:172,503+117
10 Aug 2026, 04:572,386+361
7 Aug 2026, 10:152,025no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:482,025first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.46%
avg views ÷ 2,503 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,395
Reactions total414
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
12m 08s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

414 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16038.6%
🔥10324.9%
❤‍🔥8420.3%
🥰235.56%
👍225.31%
163.86%
😁20.483%
🙏20.483%
👌10.242%
👏10.242%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC63 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Неприятная правда о классической психологии, о которой не говорят вслух Многие до сих пор уверены, что классическая психология работает только через научный и безопасный подход. Со стороны это звучит правильно, спокойно и даже внушает доверие, но почти никто не задаёт себе один неудобный вопрос. 🤩Кто именно решает, какие методы считать допустимыми, а какие нет, и какие критерии этого «позволения». Когда психолог г

🔥4

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

6 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC133 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Сегодня в Инсте случился ажиотаж по поводу моего ролика, в котором я рассказывала, как перенаправляю энергию жира в рост волос🔥 Было много вопросов и комментариев с просьбой дать технику и объяснить, как работает. Меня удивляет, что люди до сих пор не знают, как работают энергопрактики с научной точки зрения. Делюсь и с вами🤩 Как распаковка жировой ткани помогает волосам: Гормональная активность жира. Жировая т

7❤‍🔥3🥰2👌1

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

6 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC122 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Диагностическая практика: «Аудит ядра личности. Моя точка сборки» с Ириной Потапенко #практика #аудит_ядра_личности

3😁2❤‍🔥1

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

6 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Для тех, кто делает диагностику, можете посмотреть эфир в помощь из закрытого клуба: Диагностическая практика: «Аудит ядра личности. Моя точка сборки» с Ириной Потапенко 🤩Провели честный аудит нашей идентичности. Увидели свою систему целиком, рассмотрели все уровни — от Выживания до Творца — и определили свою текущую Точку Сборки. В программе: 🤩 Как устроено ядро личности и почему работа с последствиями вторична и

2🙏2

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC116 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰32

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC155 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Вчера я подняла тему самоидентичности и старой версии себя, и получила очень много откликов. Честно, я даже не ожидала такого количества сообщений. Очень много похожих фраз: “Как точно описано это состояние… Вроде многое понимаешь, а в решающие моменты всё равно действуешь по привычке» «Ой, как в точку! 😔 Вечно пытаюсь измениться, а возвращаюсь к старой себе. Это как бег по кругу! Спасибо за диагностику — очень хочу

🔥76🥰4

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC133 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие квантовые специалисты - выпускники и студенты нашей Академии! Приглашаем вас 6 августа в 16:00 (МСК) на открытую интервизию -воркшоп «Стратегия создания мультиканальной системы развития квантового специалиста с помощью ИИ» в Ассоциации квантовых специалистов 🎤 Ведущая — Ирина Потапенко Основатель Академии квантовой психологии «Квантовая Мастерская», руководитель Ассоциации квантовых специалистов. Мир измен

🔥4🥰3❤‍🔥2

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC122 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1❤‍🔥1🥰1

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC146 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кому действительно пора к квантовому психологу? Не всем нужен этот подход, и это как раз хорошая новость. 🤩Если человеку важно ещё познавать себя через боль, жить в жертве и деструктивных сценариях,долго ходить по кругу, разбирать старые истории, искать виноватых и снова возвращаться в детство, квантовый подход ему, скорее всего, не подойдёт. 🤩Он обычно откликается тем, кто уже устал развиваться через свои травмы

16🔥16❤‍🔥14👏1

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC135 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Немного о нашем о женском🤩 Меня все спрашивают, что ты делаешь со своими волосами? Почему они у тебя такие густые и здоровые, и так быстро растут? В видео поделилась своим секретом между нами, девочки🤩 На самом деле я не люблю все эти баночки с масками, бальзамы, масла, уходы и процедуры для волос, потому что всё, что мы делаем снаружи - это имеет временный результат. Гораздо важнее, что происходит внутри вас! А в

❤‍🔥5👍4🔥42

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

5 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC153 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

НОВАЯ РУБРИКА «РЕШАЕМ ЗАДАЧИ» Почему женщина может годами хотеть гармоничных отношений, но внутри всё равно выбирать одиночество? Ей 35. Она хочет рядом сильного, зрелого, надежного мужчину. Но отношения не складываются. Она идет к разным специалистам. Один советует визуализировать идеального партнера и проживать это состояние внутри. Другой разбирает детские травмы, убеждения, сценарии одиночества и привычные реа

18🔥18❤‍🔥166

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

3 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC172 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥17🔥64🥰2

Signed Ирина Потапенко ||психолог будущего

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @irina_potapenko_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,236 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ирина Потапенко - Психолог нового поколения” (@irina_potapenko_psy), 2,503 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irina_potapenko_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.