⚠️18 августа 2026 года USCIS подробно разъяснила понятие «общественной обузы» (public charge). ✔️Правило public charge позволяет оценивать, существует ли вероятность того, что человек в будущем станет преимущественно зависеть от определенных государственных пособий. При этом получение помощи не означает автоматический отказ. ❗️USCIS должна учитывать пять основных факторов: • возраст • состояние здоровья • семейно…

Channel
Ирина об Иммиграции в США
@irina_inusa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
375subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001744630518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irina_inusa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irina_inusa |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 375 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 377 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 378 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 381 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 383 | no change |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 383 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
‼️Министерство юстиции раскрыло одно из крупнейших дел о marriage fraud в истории США. Было организовано более 1000 фиктивных браков. Некоторые иностранцы платили за участие в схеме до $100 000 ⠀ ⚠️При выдаче грин-карты через брак USCIS должна установить, что отношения были реальными и заключены добросовестно, а не исключительно ради иммиграционной выгоды. ⠀ ⚠️Если позднее выясняется, что человек не имел права на per…
‼️С 5 августа 2026 года офицеры USCIS офицеры получили право немедленно отказывать в петициях, если в них с самого начала не хватает необходимых доказательств без предварительного запроса дополнительных доказательств (RFE) или уведомления о намерении отказать (NOID) ✔️Раньше, если в поданном пакете не хватало документов или доказательств, заявитель нередко получал RFE (запрос на дополнительные доказательства) и возм…
‼️С 11 августа 2026 года вступило в силу новое правило Департамента внутренней безопасности США, которое позволяет USCIS в дальнейшем сделать электронную подачу обязательной для определенных иммиграционных форм. ⚠️Если форма доступна для электронной подачи не менее 180 дней, USCIS сможет потребовать подавать ее только онлайн. При этом о введении обязательной электронной подачи конкретной формы USCIS должна предупред…
❤1👍1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @irina_inusa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Mariya_Allabyan · 66,409
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ирина об Иммиграции в США” (@irina_inusa), 375 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irina_inusa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.