Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 542–551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 03:57
544
-2
5 Sept 2026, 17:41
546
-1
29 Aug 2026, 05:16
547
+4
22 Aug 2026, 09:16
543
-4
15 Aug 2026, 02:37
547
-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:45
550
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:58
550
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
617 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5208638961643171018
99
16.0%
🔥
89
14.4%
custom 5233631608266829847
69
11.2%
custom 5224467784439734593
58
9.40%
❤🔥
50
8.10%
🥰
48
7.78%
custom 5380041902311639065
46
7.46%
custom 5265133011539607497
28
4.54%
custom 5262912590756982214
27
4.38%
custom 5352693122528724986
26
4.21%
😁
20
3.24%
custom 5262657160461955295
18
2.92%
😍
15
2.43%
🤣
11
1.78%
custom 5393197898240369117
5
0.81%
custom 5235466822022606888
4
0.648%
custom 5260567255145539253
4
0.648%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irina_hutornaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вышла сегодня на тренировку по пилатесу, хорошо позанималась и направилась пообедать. Встретила по дороге свою старую приятельницу Оксану, которая лет 10 назад обучала меня ченнелингу на Бали))
Потом мы проживали еще несколько совместных эпизодов, в разных странах и на 8 лет разошлись путями
Мы пошли обедать вместе, потом пить кофе, гулять через всю Поляну и так залпом 4 часа пролетели в обсуждении всего
Интересно…
Это сегодня после практики на просмотр тонкого 🤩
Ну а что, учимся видеть необычные интересные случаи))
«Стандартное обучение у Иры» - это когда сказала будет Лайт тема - склейка: почти 5 часов увлекательнейших погружений.
Сказала просто посмотрим на примере симптом в теле и его причины - склейка: все в ахуе от причин и к чему так ведет душа, кого-то жарит)
Погружение в тонкий план - это нечто. Это путешествие в о…
Дела хорошо) много разного
Вот например, сегодня:
Позавтракала
Прогулялась по лесу
Сходила на индивид тренировку по пилатесу, попа горела
Пошла выпить кофе в кофейню, там сделала несколько задач по работе, дала помощнице задания
Забрала посылки
Приехала домой
Распаковала посылки
На балконе посидела на солнышке
Провела чистку мужчине от порчи на болезнь
Прошла личную терапию
Перекусила
На балконе попила чай
…
Утром 07 июля:
-Планируешь пойти на обучение тонкому?
- Интересно очень, но пока нет, столько всего ..
- А ты?
- пока тоже нет
13 июля:
- Сияна, я пошла на обучение)
- и я уже там
Вот такие дела 😁🫠
Интересно, что когда я только анонсировала обучение «Атлас тонкого» я видела четкую цифру, сколько должно быть участников. Но сама подумала: да вряд ли, думаю будет меньше. Но внутри все равно было это число
И когда пришло время начинать обучение, было только чуть больше половины от мною увиденного. Я подумала - эх, видела же иначе
И просто продолжила делать свое дело. Обучать, писать посты по отклику. Себе обознач…
У меня сегодня хороший качественный выходной
Никуда не спешу
Погуляла по лесу
Выпила кофе с подругой
Сходила на глубокий массаж
Лежу, сижу на балконе
Просто смакую все, что происходит
Качественно работала ударно)) и сегодня качественно отдохнула. Баланс
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @irina_hutornaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ирина Хуторная ❤️🔥” (@irina_hutornaya), 544 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irina_hutornaya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
