Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 838–865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:18
841
-12
9 Sept 2026, 05:41
853
-3
29 Aug 2026, 23:34
856
-6
22 Aug 2026, 04:38
862
+6
15 Aug 2026, 00:27
856
+3
8 Aug 2026, 01:18
853
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:22
853
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 11s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
130 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29
22.3%
🤡
24
18.5%
❤🔥
21
16.2%
🥰
18
13.8%
🔥
17
13.1%
👍
10
7.69%
🏆
9
6.92%
👏
1
0.769%
💯
1
0.769%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
25.0%
5 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
105
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
97.0
over 15 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Когда прошлое однажды стучится в дверь… 🚪🔔
Иногда жизнь удивляет самым неожиданным образом.
Почти 30 лет я работала в ОАО «РЖД». За это время было много всего: работа, любимые коллеги, корпоративные праздники, которые я с удовольствием помогала организовывать.
Тогда мне даже в голову не приходило, что однажды этот опыт вернётся совсем в другой роли.
Недавно меня пригласили стать онлайн-соведущей на празднике по слу…
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие мои! ❤️
Иногда лучший итог недели — не количество сделанных дел. 📝
А чувство, что вы прожили её красиво.
Пусть пятница подарит именно это ощущение. 🎆
Выдохните. 😮💨
Улыбнитесь. 😄
И позвольте себе немного счастливой беззаботности.
Пятница — ловим пыльцу пятничного вайба и отдыхаем.
С любовью,
Ирина Гивис
Givis 💫
пятница • счастье • отдых • улыбка • гармония • настроение • жизнь • Ирина Givis
#ИринаГивис #п…
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие мои! ❤️
До пятницы осталось совсем чуть-чуть. 🗓️
Поэтому сегодня особенно важно не растратить своё настроение на мелочи. ✨
Пусть каждый хороший момент станет ещё одной ступенькой к красивому завершению недели. 🪜
Четверг — держите курс на лёгкость.
С любовью,
Ирина Гивис
Givis 💫
четверг • настроение • путь • энергия • радость • вдохновение • пятница • Ирина Givis
#ИринаГивис #четверг #настроение #финишнаяп…
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие мои! ❤️
Неделя уже на середине.
Не спрашивайте себя, сколько ещё осталось.
Лучше спросите: «Как я хочу прожить сегодняшний день?».
Пусть в нём будет место и делам ✅, и улыбкам 😊, и нескольким минутам только для себя. 🧘♀️
Именно так рождается настоящий баланс.
Среда — держите баланс.
С любовью,
Ирина Гивис
Givis 💫
среда • баланс • день • радость • энергия • вдохновение • гармония • Ирина Givis
#ИринаГивис…
Иногда лучший подарок — это чувства, которые остаются навсегда. ❤️
Сегодня в моей ленте живёт особенная история.
Для Хеды этот ролик стал сразу тройным подарком: поздравлением с годовщиной свадьбы, искренним признанием в любви от мужа и тёплым воспоминанием, которое теперь останется не только в семейном архиве, но и здесь — среди тысяч добрых сердец. 🫂🧡
Такие слова не теряют своей ценности с годами. Их можно перес…
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие мои! ❤️
Сегодня отличный день вспомнить, ради чего вы начали.
Не гонитесь за идеалом.
Гораздо важнее сохранить интерес, внутренний огонь и желание идти дальше. 🔥
Пусть каждый сегодняшний успех станет топливом для следующего. ⛽🏆
Вторник — включаемся и набираем обороты.
С любовью,
Ирина Гивис
Givis 💫
вторник • мотивация • движение • успех • энергия • вдохновение • развитие • Ирина Givis
#ИринаГивис #вторник…
🚆 Почти 30 лет я оформляла перевозочные документы. А теперь… провожаю людей в хорошее настроение.
Недавно мне предложили стать онлайн-соведущей в роли проводницы на дне рождения компании.
Самое интересное, что компания никак не связана с железной дорогой.
И знаете… эта роль мне неожиданно очень понравилась.
Потому что это часть моей жизни. Почти 30 лет я работала в ОАО «РЖД». За это время были тысячи документов, от…
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🤡2❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irina_givis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 139%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 189%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 133%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал Ирины Гивис/Givis” (@irina_givis), 841 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irina_givis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.