Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки админа Иришки

@irenesnotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

166subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002243693606
TypeChannel
Username@irenesnotes
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/irenesnotes

Growth

1601661636 August 2026 — 160 subscribers6 August 2026 — 163 subscribers8 August 2026 — 163 subscribers13 August 2026 — 166 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:06166+3
8 Aug 2026, 16:32163no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:20163+3
6 Aug 2026, 01:48160first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1199.4%
avg views ÷ 166 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,990
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.495%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total27,875
Reactions total137
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7731.0%
😁6325.4%
💯3815.3%
2610.5%
🤣104.03%
👍62.42%
🍾52.02%
🤯52.02%
👏41.61%
🤬41.61%
🤝31.21%
20.806%
🍌20.806%
🌚10.403%
👌10.403%
🤓10.403%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC36 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эксперты не исключают дальнейшего роста Записки админа Иришки

😁4💯3

7 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC41 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

За Ксюшу Соломатину, которая сегодня отмечает День рождения!

🔥6

6 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC55 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Год назад, кстати, мне один друг на полном серьезе доказывал, что водитель-дальнобойщик — это более сложная профессия, чем главред ТГ-медиа 😂

😁51

6 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC55 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Зато это "чистенькая" работа Сколько раз вы слышали такую фразу относительно вашей профессии? Я — примерно миллион. И примерно столько же другую — "Ну, это не в шахте работать". Сижу, монтирую прямо очень сложный ролик. Линия повествования не выстраивается, что-то постоянно не клеится, приходится по десять раз переставлять куски местами, темпы продвижения из-за этого минимальны. Ночью поэтому плохо сплю: незавершен

💯6🤝1

5 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈10,200 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У версии «ПИК остался без пиара» есть одна небольшая проблема по имени Татьяна Гулина-Сейранян. Команда под ее руководством занимается PR компании с 2016 года и продолжает работать с ПИК. Более того, сама Татьяна по-прежнему указана на официальном сайте девелопера как пресс-секретарь. Каким образом ушел Евгений Сямин, неизвестно, но очевидно, что PR нашего намбер ван от этого не пострадает. ПИК, можно не моргать:

💯53🍌2🔥2🌚1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC127 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Меж тем, @novostroyman двинулся в сторону своей первой десяточки. Господи боже, через 11 месяцев моему первому в жизни самостоятельному проекту будет 10 лет. ДЕСЯТЬ ЛЕТ!!! Нет, ну вы можете в это поверить? Записки админа Иришки

9🔥6🍾5

3 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈9,880 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я солью тебя через 3, 2... Смотрю на ситуацию вокруг покупки Сергеем Лазаревым квартиры в Майями и обалдеваю 🤯. Какие мозги должны быть у брокера, чтобы слить СМИ информацию о том, что певец купил квартиру в США в 2026-м году?? Но давайте по порядку. Что произошло? На днях стало известно, что Сергей Лазарев приобрел квартиру в Майами. Сам певец и его пресс-служба от комментариев отказались. Зато за них неожиданно

🤯5🤬4

3 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC117 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Могли ли девелоперы придумать более тупую фразу, чем "Не кладите трубку, оператор ответит на ваш звонок", когда звонят тебе сами??? На какой именно мой звонок, если это вы мне набрали?? шел 2026-й, девелоперы не могли наладить работу с холодными звонками 🙈 Записки админа Иришки

💯7😁6🤣3👏1🤓1

31 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC139 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочу знать, кто у Сережи Смирнова юрист. Я тоже хочу так писать и чтобы мне за это ничего не было 😂 Записки админа Иришки

😁7💯1

22 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC173 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо, испанский, тебе за это

🤣5😁4

19 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос к PR и пресс-службам. Как вы относитесь, если вам пишут представители СМИ и ТГ-каналов во внерабочее время?

  1. Нормально, это часть моей работы63%
  2. Плохо! Рабочее время для кого придумано?11%
  3. Если это критичный вопрос - норм. В остальных случаях - плохо26%
  4. Я так устал(а) от этого 💩16%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC231 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тяжелая артиллерия в "Эталоне" О как. Намедни оказалось, что Виктор Жиров, экс-пресс-сек INGRAD, трудится теперь в "Эталоне". Я пропустила момент, когда Виктор перешел в новую компанию, но для "Эталона", у которого сейчас многое откровенно плохо, это сумасшедшая находка. Мы сотрудничали с Виктором несколько раз, и я знаю, что это профи с большой буквы. Мегакомпетентный, всегда глубоко погруженный в проекты (до мел

7💯3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irenesnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Вопрос к PR и пресс-службам. Как вы относитесь, если вам пишут представители СМИ и ТГ-каналов во внерабочее время?

  1. Нормально, это часть моей работы63%
  2. Плохо! Рабочее время для кого придумано?11%
  3. Если это критичный вопрос - норм. В остальных случаях - плохо26%
  4. Я так устал(а) от этого 💩16%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,053 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки админа Иришки” (@irenesnotes), 166 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irenesnotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.