Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Заскриптованный

Channel

Заскриптованный

@ireadscripts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,581subscribers

-73 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001492598129
TypeChannel
Username@ireadscripts
DescriptionЧитаю сценарии и сравниваю написанное со снятым. Все разборы: https://t.me/ireadscripts/6341 Папка с разобранными сценариями: https://vk.cc/cbTbtJ Автор: @vlad_kopysov // ркн: https://clck.ru/3GWjeT
Created19 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ireadscripts

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,56012,65412,6076 August 2026 — 12,654 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,654 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,645 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,637 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,638 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,637 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,633 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,631 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,621 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,619 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,616 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,605 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,603 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,596 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,590 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,588 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,589 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,587 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,592 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,586 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,587 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,592 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,585 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,570 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,564 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,561 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,562 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,560 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,609 subscribers1 October 2026 — 12,606 subscribers6 October 2026 — 12,597 subscribers11 October 2026 — 12,599 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,605 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,606 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,605 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,607 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,605 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,617 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,623 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,622 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,617 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,618 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,617 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,611 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,605 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,601 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,599 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,601 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,598 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,595 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,594 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,592 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,594 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,590 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,583 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,585 subscribers10 November 2026 — 12,581 subscribers12,5816 August 202610 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 96 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,546–12,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:5912,581-4
8 Nov 2026, 22:0112,585+2
7 Nov 2026, 16:5112,583-7
6 Nov 2026, 16:4612,590-4
5 Nov 2026, 13:1712,594+2
4 Nov 2026, 11:5612,592-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:0712,594-1
2 Nov 2026, 12:0712,595-3
1 Nov 2026, 13:2912,598-3
31 Oct 2026, 10:4412,601+2
30 Oct 2026, 12:5012,599-2
29 Oct 2026, 12:0512,601-4
27 Oct 2026, 14:3812,605-6
26 Oct 2026, 17:1612,611-6
25 Oct 2026, 20:4512,617-1
23 Oct 2026, 19:4712,618+1
22 Oct 2026, 21:0412,617-5
21 Oct 2026, 15:5712,622-1
20 Oct 2026, 09:2112,623+6
19 Oct 2026, 06:2112,617first reading

Engagement

75 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.6%
avg views ÷ 12,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.643%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 75 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held75 (15 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total38,880
Reactions total250
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,940
Videos
≈651
Links
≈2,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 00s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,451 reactions across 68 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥51935.8%
😁48133.1%
👍1329.10%
❤‍🔥986.75%
😢463.17%
🍾402.76%
🤯352.41%
🍓241.65%
😱211.45%
🤩201.38%
🎉181.24%
👏171.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (26.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 20:30 UTC≈1,010 views23 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Латчем — продюсер «Наруто», то есть анимешник Наконец-то вселенная DC в надёжных руках 🥺

😁19🤯4

9 Nov 2026, 20:27 UTC870 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Джеймс Ганн и Питер Сафран больше не будут возглавлять DC Studios. Дуэт по-прежнему будет принимать участие в креативном процессе. Должность руководителя с 1 декабря займет ветеран Marvel Джереми Латчем. Фото: «Легион-медиа» / SOPA Images Limited 🗞 Подписаться на Новости

😢5

6 Nov 2026, 14:58 UTC≈2,320 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В апреле 1955 года в Неваде прошли атомные испытания А ещё в апреле 1955 года возьмёт своё начало приквел «Очень странных дел» — «Другие миры» Поначалу скептически отнесся, особенно помня, как плохо схожую задачу с «Игрой престолов» решал HBO, но блин… я слишком люблю всю эту конспирологию (и документалистику!) вокруг ядерки, чтобы не ждать такое. Что занятно, целью тех испытаний в Неваде было изучение влияния на …

🔥4😢1

5 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,250 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Три недели до релиза одной из моих самых ожидаемых новинок ноября

❤‍🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 19:43 UTC≈1,500 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @penpenworkPhoto

🌱 Свеженький трейлер напоминает, что «Ночь дурака» расцветет на Netflix уже 26 ноября! В честь приближающегося релиза опубликовали трейлер и постер сериала. Экранизацией манги Касуми Ясуды занимаются студии Sunrise и Shaft, а режиссером выступает Ацуюки Юкава, поставивший отдельные сцены в «Судзумэ, закрывающей двери». Если вдруг забыли, события «Ночи дурака» разворачиваются в безрадостном будущем, где вымерли раст…

🎉5❤‍🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 09:31 UTC≈1,530 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

К выходу «Обители зла» на стримингах официальный аккаунт и Fandango разыгрывают сценарий с подписью Зака Креггера и Остина Абрамса 🫨 К слову, посмотрел вчера — классный адреналиновый аттракцион. 8 из 10. Креггеру, по ходу, тяжело будет по профессиональной жизни, у всех его следующих проектов будет непомерно высокая планка ожиданий.

🔥24👍5🤯1

31 Oct 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,970 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Всем хэппи хэллоуин! 🎃🦇 📼 подсмотрено у thepeakpath

🔥10

26 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,790 views19 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Жду «Фурию» с осени 2023-го и ещё дольше мечтаю, чтобы в России появился классный «шпионский» масс-маркет проект Тизер бодрый! Очень надеюсь, что у Александра Ханта, Артема Габрелянова, Дмитрия Яковенко и Николая Титова получился сериальный блокбастер

🔥11❤‍🔥7😁1

24 Oct 2026, 08:27 UTC≈2,740 views37 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Потрачено, старик Ридли снова всё сольёт и утопит в библейских мотивах

😢23😁7🍾4🎉2😱1

24 Oct 2026, 08:27 UTC≈2,500 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @kinopoisk_soonPhoto

Сценаристом нового «Чужого» станет Аарон Гузиковский, автор «Пленниц» Дени Вильнева и шоураннер «Воспитанных волками». Кино будет связано не с недавним «Ромулом», а с «Заветом» и «Прометеем». Похоже, именно об этом проекте говорил Ридли Скотт пару месяцев назад. Сам он пока выступает лишь продюсером фильма. 🗞 Подписаться на Новости

🔥12😢7👍4❤‍🔥2🎉2

22 Oct 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,130 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @remizorro

Официально: Slayground Джереми Солнье выйдет в российский прокат 4-го февраля.

🔥8

Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @ireadscripts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTCAnonymous Poll275 voters

Стало любопытно, как давно вы подписаны на канал?

  1. С самого его начала в далеком и прекрасном 2019 году10%
  2. Пару-тройку лет или даже больше67%
  3. Не знаю, недавно кажется подписался21%
  4. Да вот на днях пришел то ли с репоста, то ли по ссылке3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кинопоиск Видеоэссе
@kinopoisk_videoessay · 20,406
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
Культовые русские сериалы
@KingOfYantar · 35,906
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
Кинопоиск | Индустрия
@kinopoisk_Industry · 28,544
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
ШишКИНО
@shishkino · 41,927
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Cinema Critique
@cinemacritique · 18,912
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 2 October 2026
Дима SuperVHS: мемы и кино
@supervhs · 27,832
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Запасаемся попкорном
@zapasaemsyapopkornom · 40,879
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
ШОУРАННЕР
@iamshowrunner · 50,371
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
Общим планом
@obschimplanom · 23,101
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Кроненберг нефильтрованный
@Cronenberg1664 · 38,552
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Cinemagraphie
@cinemagraphie · 21,332
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Новости кинопроизводства
@filmres · 37,652
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
PosterPorn
@poster_pron · 18,929
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
Фёдор, Бонд и Чук
@FBChu · 46,256
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Макс и сериалы
@MaxAndSe · 22,829
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
KinoReel
@kinoreel · 50,593
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
БК медиа
@kinometro · 32,914
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Заскриптованный” (@ireadscripts), 12,581 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ireadscripts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.