Channel
@irderapjadid
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
297subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002244885408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irderapjadid |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 12 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irderapjadid |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 297 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 298 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 297 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 297 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2024 to 30 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام بچه ها بعد این همه وقت اومدم ولی با رباتی اومدم که میترکونه چشمک بزن توکن بگیری خیلی شیک و تمیز خیلیم معتبره شروع کنید تا دیر نشده https://t.me/blinkgameai_bot/blink?startapp=5744753118_fafadfbca923cc62b1de96e2754db558
https://t.me/blinkgameai_bot/blink?startapp=5744753118_fafadfbca923cc62b1de96e2754db558
💥 Cats Youtube Task Code 🔥کد تسک یوتیوب ۵۰۰ امتیازی کتز ⚡️Free Crypto CODE : dip برای ورود اینجا ضربه بزنید
#cats جواب تسک یوتیوب کتز ۱۱ مهر Boost Your Cats Earnings!👇 dildo تسک جدید یوتیوب کتز ۱۲ مهر Futures Trading PART 1👇 AIRNODE برای ورود اینجا ضربه بزنید
آموزش کامل تصویری نات پیکسل #آموزش #notpixel برای ورود اینجا ضربه بزنید
👍1
https://t.me/coub/app?startapp=coub__marker_17950578 این ربات برای خود تلگرامه شاید همتون اینو شروع کرده باشید چون تو تسک بیشتر رباتا هستش . دیگه نمیگم حتما خوبه صد در صد پول میده ولی رشد خوبی داره خواستید شروع کنید اونایی که شروع نکردن
سلام دوستای گلم از امروز فعالیت کانالمون دوباره شروع میشه به علت اینکه رباتای چرت زیاد شده دیگه فقط اونایی که مثله ناتکوین برا خود تلگرام هستش رو معرفی میکنیم
https://t.me/sparkscirclebot?start=ref2645083 بچه ها این رباتو ماجور معرفی کرده فک کنم جا نمیمونیم ازش بهتره
مطمئن شدم که ارزش داره که گذاشتم اگه خواستید بگید اموزش کاملم بزارم
https://t.me/notpixel/app?startapp=f5744753118 دوستانی که نات پیکسل رو شروع نکردن از اینجا وارد شن
اگه قرار شد رباتی معرفی کنیم سعی میکنیم یه چیزی باشه مثله major که مطمئنم پول خوبی میده
سلام دوستای عزیز به علت اینکه واقعا ربات ها درامد خوبی برای اکثر عزیزان نداشته تا حالا فعلا رباتی معرفی نمیشه من شرمنده شما عزیزان شدم اما این چن تا رباتی که قبلا معرفی شون کرده بودمو حتما دنبال کنید به جز اینها به بقیه شون امید زیادی نیست . ۱ همستر ... اینو ادامه بدید نا امید نشید چون درامد خیلی بالایی داشتن محاله پاداش بدی بدن 2 ماجور major ..... مطمئنم که این مثله ناتکوین و داگز پول خوبی میده ۳ ماسک امپایر . Cex…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irderapjadid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@irderapjadid named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش ایردراپ های جدید و معتبر” (@irderapjadid), 297 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irderapjadid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.