Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for talk about

Channel

talk about

@iratalkabout

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001837269187
TypeChannel
Username@iratalkabout
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/iratalkabout

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2931307 August 2026 — 29 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30 subscribers7 October 2026 — 31 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 61 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 16:5831+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:4330+1
11 Aug 2026, 05:3029no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:1329first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3549.3%
😁1622.5%
🤣1318.3%
custom 530784322718796071022.82%
custom 537754368733927631022.82%
custom 539553269829705895622.82%
😭11.41%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 10:19 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

если бы выражение «из крайности в крайность» было туфельками:

😁7

16 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC56 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

нас не сбить с пути, мы не знаем куда идем

😁6

14 Jun 2026, 16:16 UTC58 viewsread 11 August 2026

норм дела только у химиков, инженеров, архитекторов

14 Jun 2026, 16:15 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026

еще момент для размышления да: kpi в науке это бесполезная вещь или нет (особенно после нейронок)? и с появлением нейронок как дела у точных наук, докажут ли они какие-то математические теоремы, доселе непонятные миру?

14 Jun 2026, 06:32 UTC33 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

всё, не прокатит в. иванович, прощения не ждите, песенка спета

🤣6😁3

13 Jun 2026, 19:25 UTC31 viewsread 11 August 2026

в принципе я осознаю что можно придумать и промпт на краткий пересказ для осмысления работы но все же 🤩

13 Jun 2026, 19:20 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026

слушайте, мне кажется что антиплагиат изжил себя с появлением нейронок, все превращается в игру «кто кого перехитрит» ;) Даже наверное изжил себя не сам антиплагиат, а вообще институт курсовых и подобных им работ (возможно даже…диссертаций…) критерии оценки надо отправлять в направлении понимания и осмысления студентом собственной работы, вот так я думаю

10 Jun 2026, 16:20 UTC40 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

жанр-психологический триллер

❤5

10 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC37 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

хочу написать научную работу по теме исследования поведенческих особенностей научных руководителей и их онтогенеза Ключевой проблемой поставлю вопрос: как в этой научной катастрофе защитить диссертацию получить нормальное образование? актуальность говорит сама за себя всех пострадавших зову в авторский коллектив.

❤6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iratalkabout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“talk about” (@iratalkabout), 31 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iratalkabout.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.