Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عراق ب فارسی

Channel

عراق ب فارسی

@iraq_in_persian

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,539subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511419048
TypeChannel
Username@iraq_in_persian
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iraq_in_persian

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@iraq_in_persian/28259 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC@iraq_farsi/77686 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC0.99under a minute
@iraq_in_persian/28253 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC@iraq_farsi/77665 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC0.98under a minute
@iraq_in_persian/28236 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC@iraq_farsi/77574 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC0.98under a minute
@iraq_in_persian/28247 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC@iraq_farsi/77605 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC0.96under a minute
@iraq_in_persian/28258 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC@iraq_farsi/77676 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC0.96under a minute
@iraq_in_persian/28241 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC@iraq_farsi/77594 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC0.94under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@iraq_farsi6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (60)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 32 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @iraq_in_persian — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,5393,5923,565.56 August 2026 — 3,592 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,592 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,591 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,585 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,580 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,572 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,564 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,562 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,558 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,553 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,552 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,548 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,542 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,539 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,531–3,600 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:223,539-3
14 Sept 2026, 04:003,542-6
10 Sept 2026, 18:203,548-4
1 Sept 2026, 15:033,552-1
29 Aug 2026, 05:043,553-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:073,558-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:253,562-2
20 Aug 2026, 11:583,564-8
17 Aug 2026, 09:243,572-8
13 Aug 2026, 08:473,580-5
10 Aug 2026, 17:453,585-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:223,591-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:313,592no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:283,592first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 33 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 06s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 32 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4552.9%
👍2934.1%
👎55.88%
😱33.53%
🤣33.53%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 فــــــــــــــــــــورى الولائى: مجاهدان و خانواده هاى شهدا منتظر پاسخ به تجاوز هستند؛ مسئولان از فرصت ايجاد شده استفاده كنند عراق ب فارسى - ابو آلاء #الولائى دبيركل كتائب #سيدالشهداء: تصمیم مقاومت اسلامی عراق برای به تعویق انداختن پاسخ، در پی درخواست رهبران #چارچوب_هماهنگی، و در رأس آنها هادى #العامری و سیاستمداران شریف اتخاذ شد. بازنگری در زمان‌ بندی، حجم و نوع پاسخ همچنان مطرح است؛ این امر یک وظیفه اعتقادی و

🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👆🏻 فــــــــــــــــــــورى #صابرين_نيوز: از ساعات اولیه شب تاکنون، دست ‌کم 12 فروند هواپیمای سوخت ‌رسان بر فراز کشورهای حوزه خلیج فارس و #عراق به پرواز درآمده‌ اند. @iraq_in_persian

7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC166 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👆🏻 فــــــــــــــــــــورى دعوت الزيدى براى سفر به رياض و تأكيد بر ادامه هماهنگى امنيتى ميان عراق و عربستان عراق ب فارسى - علی #الزیدی نخست ‌وزیر عراق و "خالد بن علی الحمیدان" رئیس سازمان اطلاعات عربستان، ديدار و بر تداوم هماهنگی‌ هاى امنیتی ميان دو كشور توافق کردند. الزيدى بر اهتمام #بغداد به تحکیم روابط همکاری با #رياض در راستای تأمین منافع مشترک دو کشور و تقویت امنیت و ثبات منطقه تأکید کرد. الزیدی همچنین بر م

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC167 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 فــــــــــــــــــــورى مقاومت عراق: پاسخ به آمريكا و عربستان به تعويق افتاد عراق ب فارسى - مقاومت اسلامى #عراق: در پاسخ به درخواست هادى #العامری و در همراهی با برخی از رهبران سیاسی شریف، مقرر شد پاسخ عملیاتی که قرار بود امروز، انجام شود، به تعویق بیفتد. خون پاک شهیدان هرگز کالایی برای معامله در بازار موازنه های سیاسی نخواهد بود. از کسانی که دلبستگی به قدرت، آنان را از پاسداری از خون شهدا و حراست از حاکمیت کشور

👍21

7 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴وزارت کشور #عراق: مرزهای ما شاهد سطح بالایی از امنیت و ثبات است عراق ب فارسی: وزارت کشور عراق اعلام کرد: مرزهای عراق شاهد سطح بالایی از امنیت و ثبات هستند. ▪️اقدامات نظارتی و کنترلی در امتداد نوار مرزی به تقویت امنیت مرزی و کاهش تلاش‌های نفوذ و قاچاق کمک کرده است. ▪️عملیات مرزی با راندمان بالا و طبق برنامه‌های امنیتی پیشرفته که به فناوری‌های مدرن و استقرار میدانی مؤثر متکی هستند، در حال انجام است. گذرگاه‌ها و مب

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC206 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴العامری خطاب به گروه‌های «مقاومت» عراق: هرگونه پاسخ به تجاوز #عربستان و امریکا را به تعویق بیاندازید عراق ب فارسی: #هادی_العامری رئیس سازمان بدر عراق بامداد جمعه از تمامی گروه‌های «مقاومت اسلامی» در عراق خواست که هرگونه پاسخ به آنچه که وی «تجاوز عربستان و امریکا» علیه عراق توصیف کرده است به تعویق بیاندازند. ▪️به گزارش السومریه نیوز، العامری بیان کرد که نیروهای گروه‌های مسلح باید به خاطر منافع عالی عراق خشم خود را

👍2👎21

7 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC217 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴محموله جدید دلار از امریکا وارد عراق شد عراق ب فارسی: یک منبع مسئول خبر داد که محموله جدیدی از دلار نقدی به ارزش 500 میلیون از امریکا وارد عراق شده است. ▪️به گزارش خبرگزاری رسمی عراق (واع)، وی در گفت‌وگو با این رسانه بیان کرد که بانک فدرال امریکا محموله جدیدی از دلارهای نقدی به ارزش 500 میلیون دلار برای بانک مرکزی عراق ارسال کرده است. وی افزود که مبلغ ارسالی با موافقت بانک مرکزی عراق در معامله‌های ویژه‌ای سرمایه‌

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC247 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 فــــــــــــــــــــورى رسانه‌ های عربستانى: گزارش‌ های اطلاعاتی موثقی از هماهنگی میان انصارالله #یمن، گروه هاى مقاومت #عراق و سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامى #ايران برای حمله به #عربستان وجود دارد. @iraq_in_persian

5

6 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC242 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴 فــــــــــــــــــــورى "مظهر محمد" مشاور مالی نخست وزیر عراق: ذخایر ارزی بانک مرکزی از 106 میلیارد دلار به 80 میلیارد دلار کاهش یافته است. @iraq_in_persian

👍31🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎥 ويدئــــــــــــــــــو افشاى پيشنهاد عربستان به وزير دفاع وقت عراق در دوران داعش عراق ب فارسى - "آراس حبيب" سياستمدار عراقى: #سعدون_الدليمى وزير دفاع وقت عراق، برايم نقل كرد كه سازمان اطلاعات عربستان در سال هاى حضور #داعش در عراق، در يكى از سفرهايش به #عربستان (كه خانواده اش در اين كشور زندگى مى كردند) از او خواست راه را براى ورود 5 هزار نيروى داعش به خاك #عراق هموار كند، اما وى قاطعانه مخالفت كرد. پس از اين مخا

2👍1

6 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC219 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎥 ويدئــــــــــــــــــو افزايش سطح آماده باش نظامى و امنيتى در بغداد عراق ب فارسى - همزمان با نزدیک شدن به پایان مهلت گروه‌های مقاومت #عراق به دولت برای پاسخ به تجاوز آمریکایی- سعودی به مقرهای #الحشد_الشعبی، دستور افزایش سطح آماده‌ باش امنیتی و نظامی در این کشور از طرف على #الزيدى نخست وزير كشور صادر شد. @iraq_in_persian

👎2👍1🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC199 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👆🏻 تصويــــــــــــــــر دیدار وزیر علوم ايران با وزیر بهداشت و سرپرست وزارت آموزش عالی عراق با محوریت اجرای تفاهم ‌نامه‌های علمی و توسعه همکاری‌های فناورانه ایران و عراق برگزار شد. در این دیدار وزیر علوم عنوان کرد که تجربه ایران در توسعه آموزش عالی در اختیار عراق قرار خواهد گرفت. @iraq_in_persian

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @iraq_in_persian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اساطیر نامه | مروری بر تاریخ ایران
@Asatir_Nameh · 63,087
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 August 2026
سپاه قدس
@Quds_orgii · 24,633
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
آکادمی سربازی‌آسان | دکتر سلجر
@soldier_dr · 22,073
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
شهرزیبای من بابلسر
@Babolsariha · 29,775
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عراق ب فارسی” (@iraq_in_persian), 3,539 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iraq_in_persian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.