Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ایران زمین

Channel

ایران زمین

@iranzamin777

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,339subscribers

+166 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001058461102
TypeChannel
Username@iranzamin777
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/iranzamin777

Growth

16,17316,34616,259.56 August 2026 — 16,173 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,180 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,179 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,188 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,187 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,323 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,337 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,338 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,346 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers16,3396 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,147–16,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:3516,339-7
14 Aug 2026, 18:4616,346+8
13 Aug 2026, 12:3516,338+1
12 Aug 2026, 13:3716,337+14
11 Aug 2026, 13:4116,323+136
10 Aug 2026, 14:5116,187-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:0116,188+9
8 Aug 2026, 15:4716,179-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:2016,180+7
6 Aug 2026, 17:3216,173first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.4%
avg views ÷ 16,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held29 (28 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total76,718
Reactions total7,410
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,410 reactions across 27 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,46546.8%
👍1,63122.0%
🤬88211.9%
❤‍🔥2443.29%
👎2192.96%
👏1962.65%
😢1932.60%
💔1431.93%
😡1111.50%
🔥720.972%
💯360.486%
🕊320.432%
👌280.378%
😭270.364%
🙏230.31%
🫡190.256%
👀150.202%
😎110.148%
🤓110.148%
😁100.135%
10 further kinds420.567%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,410reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 27 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iranzamin777. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC648 views176 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

. ❌ پست آرامگاه هخامنشی را در اینستاگرام هم منتشر کردیم و کمتر از هفت ساعت، بیش از ۱۲۰ هزار بازدید داشته است ؛ ولی خنده‌های هیستریک برخی‌ها زیر پست برایم جالب بود ؛ که چقدر آگاهی تاریخی در سرزمین ما کم است، و بر روی فرهنگ و تاریخ‌شناسی مردم کم کار شده است ! آثار هخامنشی که در آناتولی ( همان ترکیه جدید ) کشف شده، حتی میتوان گفت از خود ایران هم بیشتر است ؛ و در ترکیه با Perslar چه افتخاری میکنند و چه برنامه‌هایی برای

👍14423👎4👏2🍾1🔥1🕊1

16 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,360 views203 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

. 🔴 یکی از زیباترین آرامگاه‌های هخامنشی در ترکیه ... در سال ۱۹۶۹ م یک آرامگاه از نوع تومولوس، در منطقه‌ی تاتارلی در استان افیون ترکیه مورد غارت قرار گرفت. در سال ۱۹۷۰ موزه باستانشناسی افیون طی یک عملیات نجات‌بخشی توانست اتاقک چوبی این آرامگاه که به طرز عجیبی سالم مانده بود را به پژوهشگاه منتقل کند، و بعدها با انجام آزمایش کربن۱۴ مشخص شد که مربوط به نیمه نخست سده ۵ پیش از میلاد است. 🔷 نکته جالب توجه، وجود نقاشی‌های

154👍25❤‍🔥9🔥4👎3🥰3👏2🤩1

15 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,940 views209 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

. 💥 پازیریک 1 : 🔴 شیر هخامنشی در آلتای سیبری چه می‌کند؟ شگفت‌انگیز است!! 🔹 در اینجا ما بخشی از یک زین اسب که از گور شماره ۵ پازیریک یافت شده را بررسی کردیم ؛ طرح شیرهای روی این پارچه، دقیقا بدون هیچ کم کاستی همان ردیف شیرها در تزیینات هخامنشی است؛ گویی از روی هم #کپی شده‌اند! 💥 همه تصاویر بالا را با دقت ببینید و ترجمه متن کتاب کاوشگر این آثار، «رودنکو» را نیز بخوانید، ترجمه صفحه ۲۹۸ : «اکنون به بررسی نقش‌ شیرها

154👏17🔥13👍10👎4🤩32❤‍🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC≈1,550 views200 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

. 🔵 در زمینه سرپوش‌های هخامنشی، این‌بار گنجینه آمودریا را بررسی می‌کنیم : تصاویر را ببینید و با گفته‌های مورخان یونانی مقایسه کنید ... گنجینهٔ آمودریا (oxus) مجموعه‌ای شامل حدود ۱۸۰ قطعهٔ طلایی و نقره‌ای و حدود ۲۰۰ سکه از دورهٔ هخامنشی است که در حدود سال‌های ۱۸۷۷ تا ۱۸۸۰ میلادی در کناره‌های رود آمودریا، نزدیک قبادیان پیدا شدند 🔺 احتمالاً بسیاری از قطعات دیگر این گنجینه برای به‌دست‌آوردن فلز و ذوب‌شدن از بین رفته‌ا

163👍24💯3🔥3👀2🙏2❤‍🔥1👏1

13 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,680 views193 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

. 🔴 « تیارا / تیاره » اصطلاح کلی بود که یونانی‌ها برای سرپوش‌‌های ایرانی به کار می‌بردند. وقتی این تیارا راست و ایستاده پوشیده می‌شد، فقط مخصوص شاهنشاه بود و معمولاً به آن « کیداریس » ( کیداره ) می‌گفتند. وقتی شل و افتاده پوشیده می‌شد، برای ساتراپ‌ها، مقامات دربار و مغ‌ها بود، و بیشتر با نام « کُرباسیا » ( کُرپَسیَه ) شناخته می‌شد 💥💥 در دو اثر باستانی، موسوم به موزائیک اسکندر و تابوت اسکندر، این موضوع را بررسی کرده‌

146👍15🫡13🔥4🙏4❤‍🔥3👀3👌2

12 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈1,540 views171 reactionsread 13 August 2026

. ✅ اکنون #ترجمه جملات اصلی ِ شماری از این منابع کهن را ارائه می‌کنیم : 🔺 استرابو، Geographica 15.3.15 : « و در کاپادوکیه، مغان بسیار هستند است، که آنان را آتش‌افروزان نیز می‌نامند ... و هر روز، پس از ورود، تقریباً یک ساعت در برابر آتش سرود می‌خوانند، در حالی که دسته‌ای از ترکه‌ها را در دست دارند ؛ و تیاراهای نمدینی بر سر می‌گذارند که از هر دو طرف پایین می‌آیند، تا آنجا که لب‌ها و گونه را می‌‌پوشانند. » . 🔺 هرودوت

130👏18👍9👎3🔥3❤‍🔥2👌2🏆1

12 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈1,670 views197 reactionsread 13 August 2026

. 🔴 در منابع یونانی و رومی درباره پوشش و پوشاک ایرانیان باستان چه گفته شده ؟ 💥 نویسندگان و مورخان یونانی و رومی، مانند هرودوت، گزنفون، استرابون، پلوتارک، آریان و ... برای توصیف پوشاک اقوام ایرانی باستان، پارس‌ها، مادها، سکاها و پارت‌ها و ... از واژگان یونانی خاص یا کلمات وام‌ گرفته‌ شده از زبان‌های ایرانی استفاده می‌کردند : 🔷 ۱- تیارا (Tiara) : عمومی‌ترین واژه برای سرپوش‌های ایرانی. یونانیان به کلاه پارچه‌ای یا نم

156👍23❤‍🔥5👌2👎2💯2🔥2🙏2

11 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈2,020 views340 reactionsread 13 August 2026

. ❌ انقلاب مشروطه حاصل مبارزات همه شهرها و اقوام ایرانی بود، نه فقط یک « شهر خاص » ! 🆔 @iranzamin777 .

👍27428👎13👏13💯5👌2🔥2🫡2

10 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈2,430 views223 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

به گپستان و دهلیز رُستَمی بپیوندید! در سرای اندیشه و گفتارِ پارسی، تنها به زبانِ پاکِ نیاکان سخن می‌رانیم. سخن از پارسی‌گرایی‌ست! گُسترۀ ژیرَندگی و کُنشگریِ ما، پالایش و گُوالشِ زبان پارسی، گسترش و پرورش فرهنگ ایرانشهری‌ و پاسخ به ژاژخایی‌ها و یاوه‌سَرایی‌های ایران‌ستیزان است. اگر دل در گروِ پارسی و ایرانشهر داری، جای تو اینجاست: 🔻 دهلیز (کانال): 🆔️ t.me/Rostami_Siamak 🔻 گپستان (گروه): 🆔️ t.me/SR_Gapestan

172👍23👎16🔥4🤬3💯2🕊2🤩1

10 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈2,600 views291 reactionsread 13 August 2026

. 💥 گاهی کم‌کاری از خود ماست ؛ کمتر از روزگار و دیگران خرده بگیریم ! دو واژه‌ای که بسیار بسیار در تاریخ ما کاربرد داشته‌اند، ولی برابر عربی آنها درحال جا افتادن است : ❌ اســم ---------> ✅ نـــام ❌ سلام ---------> ✅ درود از این دست واژگان بیگانه که برابرهای زیبا و رایج در پارسی دارند، بسیارند ؛ هنگامی که به جای همین « نام » ساده می‌گویند « اسم » واقعا آزاردهنده است ! میدانم کمی سخت است که در گفتار روزانه خود همچون

212👍39👎20👏7🙏4🫡3❤‍🔥2👌1

9 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈2,580 views231 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

. 💥💥 مطالب پازیریک درحال آماده شدن هستند ... به این می‌گویند یک مطلب پژوهشی ناب و کاملا مستند و برپایه منابع معتبر دانشگاهی ؛ یعنی استفاده از کتاب خود کاوشگر و مقالات معتبر و البته تصاویر با کیفیت از آثار ؛ پست‌ها منتشر خواهند شد، ولی فعلا نه !!! « دست بافته‌هایی که از برخی گورهای پازیریک یافت شده‌اند، دارای طرح‌های هنری هستند که بیشتر در آثار دوره هخامنشی میتوان آنها را دید ؛ برخی از آنها نه در تزیینات هنری بومیا

176👍28👏11👎8💯4👌1🔥1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @iranzamin777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@iranzamin777 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 172,176 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تاریخ سیاه و سفید جهان
@World5History · 90,029
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
omid dana امید دانا
@rodast_omiddana · 331,818
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ایران زمین” (@iranzamin777), 16,339 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranzamin777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.